-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add runtime templates #189
Add runtime templates #189
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: heyselbi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Is there a jira for it? |
Removing myself and Davide as reviewers and adding Sean and Daniele. |
/hold |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left suggestions for changes according to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-6596
We can skip the |
@VedantMahabaleshwarkar could you check the changes are okay for you? Is it confirmed I can remove the scrape annotation? |
Initial testing is working with the DSC mentioned in the testing instructions. Will now add the vLLM template and add @dtrifiro's suggestions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
Testins instructions for the dashboard side are clear enough, just listing them in the serving runtime view should be enough.
You can add an extra step, which will be just check the list when a user deploys a model, to see if the serving runtime is there, but if the annotation is present in the Custom Serving Runtime section that should be the case.
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
FYI, when this merges, we need to remove the hold & merge the Dashboard dependant PR: opendatahub-io/odh-dashboard#2706 |
/unhold |
All testing details and results are shared in the main PR body |
Signed-off-by: heyselbi <[email protected]>
Will close: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-860
and: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-3786
Will close: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-5525 --> adding vLLM template
Might partially close: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-4227 and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-4263 --> added the startupProbe as recommended
Will close: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-6596 --> added metrics annotations to all runtime templates
Description
We are migrating the runtime templates from odh-dashboard repo to model serving repo of odh-model-controller both for ODH and RHOAI. We are also moving the image tags from kustomization.yaml to params.env per DevOps request.
How Has This Been Tested?
This has been only tested within model serving. The test together with operator and odh-dashboard is in progress (not yet complete).
pr-*
):Tests I performed:
Merge criteria: