-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: Merge contracts dev into sl stable #2762
Merged
StanislavBreadless
merged 44 commits into
sync-layer-stable
from
sb-merge-contracts-dev-into-sl-stable
Aug 28, 2024
Merged
chore: Merge contracts dev into sl stable #2762
StanislavBreadless
merged 44 commits into
sync-layer-stable
from
sb-merge-contracts-dev-into-sl-stable
Aug 28, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
## What ❔ Compressor should fail when a corresponding fri prover job is not found. Unlikely to occur in real world but helps when manually populating DB for debugging. ## Why ❔ This behaviour makes more sense ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`. --------- Co-authored-by: EmilLuta <[email protected]>
## What ❔ Allow to run `zk_inception prover init` without `chain init` Add docs for running provers and proving the batch. ## Why ❔ To provide easy way to spin up prover subsystem locally. ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Added metrics for external proof integration API, refactored code a little bit ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [24.21.0](core-v24.20.0...core-v24.21.0) (2024-08-22) ### Features * External prover API metrics, refactoring ([#2630](#2630)) ([c83cca8](c83cca8)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). --------- Co-authored-by: zksync-era-bot <[email protected]>
…2716) ## What ❔ Changes default_protective_reads_persistence_enabled to false both for main and external node ## Why ❔ For EN: it was confirmed that it works well without protective reads For main node: it's expected that vm_runner_protective_reads is run by default ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Add `holesky` for `--l1-network` config in ecosystem cmd, that will make the testnet use holesky testnet (chain id: 17000) as l1 network ## Why ❔ It can make us deploy testnet into holesky testnet more easy, in zk_inception, it will write the layer1 's chain id into the config, when use `ecosystem init` cmd, it will start chain init also, if use wrong chain id for layer1 endpoint, it will make cmd run failed, so we cannot just use layer1 endpoint to deploy a testnet in holesky. Now we add `holesky` for `--l1-network` config to let it write 17000 as chain id, that will make us to deploy testnet more easy. ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`. --------- Co-authored-by: Danil <[email protected]>
* Add cbt-related metrics; * Move last hardcoded cbt-related properties to the config.
## What ❔ Same changes as in #2687, but for stage release workflow ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
We ran into a problem in the staging environment where TEE blob fetching failed because of a 30-day retention policy on blobs in Google Cloud Storage. The TEE prover was failing for all old batches (`l1_batch_number < 58300`). This commit fixes the issue by adding better error handling when the blob for a given batch number isn't available. ## What ❔ Graceful error handling for the TEE proof data handler when there is no blob in Google Cloud Storage for the specified batch number. ## Why ❔ We need more robust error handling. ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ A few reports have shown that using spot instances is very luck-dependent, so it's not worth trying at the cost of flow disruption. ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ <!-- What are the changes this PR brings about? --> <!-- Example: This PR adds a PR template to the repo. --> <!-- (For bigger PRs adding more context is appreciated) --> ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ <!-- What are the changes this PR brings about? --> <!-- Example: This PR adds a PR template to the repo. --> <!-- (For bigger PRs adding more context is appreciated) --> ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`. Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
It should have been updated as part of these 2 PRs: - #2258 - #2486 ## What ❔ Update ProofGenerationDal docs chart. ## Why ❔ We like up-to-date docs. ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Fixes `tx.gas_price` field for legacy and EIP-2930 transactions. ## Why ❔ Follow the [spec](https://ethereum.github.io/execution-apis/api-documentation/) ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
SQLX 0.8.0 had a vulnerability, which didn't affect us. At the time of discovery, there was no fix. We silenced the warning to unlock development. This PR bumps SQLX to 0.8.1 which includes the vulnerability fix and removes the cargo deny allowlist. Co-authored-by: perekopskiy <[email protected]>
## What ❔ Adds zksolc 1.5.3, zkvyper 1.5.4 ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Uses a dedicated team for release management in CODEOWNERS. ## Why ❔ Better configurability. ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ Extracts oneshot VM executor from the API server crate. ## Why ❔ Simplifies reasoning about oneshot VM execution and its maintenance. Allows for alternative implementations. ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ <!-- What are the changes this PR brings about? --> <!-- Example: This PR adds a PR template to the repo. --> <!-- (For bigger PRs adding more context is appreciated) --> This PR adds a config to explicitly enable/disable DA verification onchain. ## Why ❔ Without this feature, any chain using custom DA had to wait for full inclusion before they could commit a batch even if they were not doing the onchain verification. ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
Fix a bug with base_token_adjuster metrics reported under a wrong namespace.
Signed-off-by: tomg10 <[email protected]>
## What ❔ - Integrates Prometheus metrics into criterion benches; removes the DIY benchmark correspondingly. - Merges the main benchmark crate with the harness one. - Includes benched bytecodes into the crate itself rather than reading them in runtime. ## Why ❔ Makes VM benchmarks more maintainable. ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [24.22.0](core-v24.21.0...core-v24.22.0) (2024-08-27) ### Features * add flag to enable/disable DA inclusion verification ([#2647](#2647)) ([b425561](b425561)) * **Base token:** add cbt metrics ([#2720](#2720)) ([58438eb](58438eb)) * Change default_protective_reads_persistence_enabled to false ([#2716](#2716)) ([8d0eee7](8d0eee7)) * **vm:** Extract oneshot VM executor interface ([#2671](#2671)) ([951d5f2](951d5f2)) * **zk_toolbox:** Add holesky testnet as layer1 network ([#2632](#2632)) ([d9266e5](d9266e5)) ### Bug Fixes * **api:** `tx.gas_price` field ([#2734](#2734)) ([aea3726](aea3726)) * **base_token_adjuster:** bug with a wrong metrics namespace ([#2744](#2744)) ([64b2ff8](64b2ff8)) * **eth-sender:** missing Gateway migration changes ([#2732](#2732)) ([a4170e9](a4170e9)) * **proof_data_handler:** TEE blob fetching error handling ([#2674](#2674)) ([c162510](c162510)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). --------- Co-authored-by: zksync-era-bot <[email protected]>
## What ❔ <!-- What are the changes this PR brings about? --> <!-- Example: This PR adds a PR template to the repo. --> <!-- (For bigger PRs adding more context is appreciated) --> ## Why ❔ <!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What are the principles behind them? --> <!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. --> ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`. Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
## What ❔ Fixes divergence in used bytecodes info between the old and new VMs. ## Why ❔ The new VM behaved differently to the old VM on far call if decommitting the called contract leads to out-of-gas revert. The old VM records the called contract bytecode as decommitted in this case; the new one didn't. ## Checklist - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ - Fix casing of "ZKsync" in READMEs and console messages in `zksync-era/zk_toolbox` - ZKsync - correct - zkSync - incorrect - ZkSync (pascal case) - PS: Some of those pascal cases may have been in purpose - let me know if I should revert any of those. ## Why ❔ - Matches newer branding ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
## What ❔ - Fixed docs link in zk_toolbox to shared bridge ## Why ❔ - Docs link in zk_toolbox to shared bridge was broken ## Checklist <!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. --> <!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. --> - [x] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs). - [x] Tests for the changes have been added / updated. - [x] Documentation comments have been added / updated. - [x] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
StanislavBreadless
requested review from
a team,
RomanBrodetski,
perekopskiy,
Deniallugo,
popzxc and
EmilLuta
as code owners
August 28, 2024 15:00
StanislavBreadless
requested review from
yorik,
alexandrst88,
artmakh,
hatemosphere,
onyxet,
otani88 and
iluwaa
and removed request for
a team
August 28, 2024 15:00
StanislavBreadless
changed the title
Merge contracts dev into sl stable
chore: Merge contracts dev into sl stable
Aug 28, 2024
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What ❔
Why ❔
Checklist
zk fmt
andzk lint
.