Adds various badge icons, rebases verified as badge-check

[karsa-mistmere]

closes #1109 #1073

Addresses some leftover comments from #416 and renames verified to be badge-check while also adding its base shape.

Also makes the shape more consistent in size with circle.

Also adds feathericons/feather#865 as part of #119

[github-actions]

Added or changed icons

Icon X-rays

[ericfennis]

Hmm I'm not sure with increasing the size of the badge outline.
I think it breaks a bit the balance in the icons
I placed side by side with twitter icon, and I think the original verified in lucide. looks way better.

[karsa-mistmere]

@ericfennis: well, in comparison to Twitter maybe, but in comparison to our own circle-check icon, I think it's the other way around (this was the trigger of this PR in the first place):

[danielbayley]

in comparison to our own circle-check icon

I think the circle is too big in that instance 😅

[karsa-mistmere]

@jguddas: well, circle and square are our baselines for all other icons. :D

If anything, the checkmark may be too small, compared to FA the proposed new base shape is much more in line (top FA, bottom PR):

[danielbayley]

@jguddas: well, circle and square are our baselines for all other icons. :D

(me 😅)

I get that… But I think the crux of it is that circle is bigger (20x20px) than square (18x18px)…

[karsa-mistmere]

I get that… But I think the crux of it is that circle is bigger (20x20px) than square (18x18px)…

Well, that's the exactly the point. Squares have a smaller visual weight than circles. 🙂

[jguddas]

If anything than it's the square that's to big. π*10px^2 = 314px vs 18x18px = 324px

[danielbayley]

Squares have a smaller visual weight than circles

Sure, but I mean in terms of trying to fit the same elements nicely inside both is problematic :)

[karsa-mistmere]

If anything than it's the square that's to big. 10px²×π = 314px² vs 18px×18px = 324px²

Oh, but you're forgetting the 2px rounding!😄
That will result in 320.56px², which is amazingly close considering we're bound to a 24 by 24 pixel grid.

[jguddas]

Oh that's right 😄 @karsa-mistmere.

We are not super consistent when we look at the convex hull to compare visual weight.

https://observablehq.com/d/fdcccb6b2881ba87

[karsa-mistmere]

@jguddas: Yeah definitely have some outliers, but we should certainly strive for consistency. :)

Also, convex hull is a nice metric, but not necessarily the best measure of visual weight, see the article above.