-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 402
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"advanced" partitioning layouts #257
Comments
@MaxRink my initial thoughts are that yes, we should likely support more advanced partitioning layouts, especially as we are looking to support things like using a separate volume for etcd, and trying to take advantage of ephemeral disks where possible for performance reasons. I suspect @voor, @codenrhoden, @randomvariable, @CecileRobertMichon, and possibly others might have additional thoughts. |
So I think the idea here was that these new partitions would exist at creation time of the actual instance as provided by the underlying IAAS rather than at time of the base image being built by image-builder. If anything, image builder should make sure those directories are ready to be mounted over. Am I misunderstanding that approach? This is related to an issue in CAPI already: |
I think this problem is cross-provider - it would be nice to have a solution (or at least interface) that is agnostic and takes an existing image and converts it into a specific layout |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Just want to chime in on this issue if anybody finds it, with the new support for overriding where images are coming from, I highly encourage an approach that partitions the image prior to running it through image builder. The requirements around partitions are vastly complex. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
@fejta-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Currently CAPI-Images build from ISOs use a very simplistic partition layout which makes them more prone for certain failures, like an overfull /var and /var/log.
We mitigated that by adding /var and /var/log partitions, but this currently breaks the cleanup-steps in sysprep as /var/log cant be deleted at this point.
We've also build autoexpansion of the OS to the disksize specified in vmware/OpenStack.
Would there be a general Interest to include such things in Image-builder, because if so i would invest time to refactor them a bit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: