feat(j-s): Allow defenders to filter cases by court date #17232
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 6 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 6 Passed Test Services
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Defender/Cases/components/DefenderCasesTable.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Add documentation and tests for the court date sorting featureWhile the implementation looks good, please consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments to document the sorting behavior for court dates
- Adding unit tests to verify:
- Sorting of court dates including null/undefined values
- Integration with the existing table functionality
Would you like me to help generate the test cases for this feature?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Defender/Cases/components/DefenderCasesTable.tsx(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Defender/Cases/components/DefenderCasesTable.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Defender/Cases/components/DefenderCasesTable.tsx (1)
135-141: Verify sorting behavior for null court dates
The implementation follows the existing pattern, but there are two considerations:
- The title uses "hearingArrangementDate" which might be confusing for users expecting "Court Date".
- The sorting implementation needs to handle cases where courtDate is null/undefined.
Let's verify the sorting implementation:
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Defender/Cases/components/DefenderCasesTable.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17232 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 35.68% 35.66% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 6922 6948 +26
Lines 148524 148534 +10
Branches 42419 42424 +5
==========================================
- Hits 53008 52969 -39
- Misses 95516 95565 +49
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 73 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Defender/Cases/components/DefenderCasesTable.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Verjandi geti raðað eftir fyrirtöku á málalista eins og önnur hlutverk geta gert
What
Allow defenders to filter case list by court date
Why
It's convenient
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes