chore(j-s): Use Table component for appealed cases #14764
Conversation
WalkthroughThe updates involve refining the structure and functionality of the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #14764 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 37.06% 37.06%
=======================================
Files 6298 6298
Lines 127852 127844 -8
Branches 36556 36572 +16
=======================================
- Hits 47383 47382 -1
+ Misses 80469 80462 -7
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
oddsson
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/AppealCasesTable/AppealCasesTable.tsx (5 hunks)
- apps/judicial-system/web/src/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Path-based Instructions (2)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/types/index.ts (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/AppealCasesTable/AppealCasesTable.tsx (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
Additional comments not posted (4)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/types/index.ts (1)
21-25: The addition of 'appealedDate' to thesortableTableColumntype is well-integrated and enhances sorting capabilities.Verification successful
The addition of 'appealedDate' to the
sortableTableColumntype has been successfully integrated and is being utilized appropriately across various components and backend functionalities of the application. This enhancement supports sorting capabilities and is reflected in both UI and API layers, ensuring a consistent and functional implementation.
- Files and components confirming usage:
- Frontend:
AppealCasesTable,CaseTitleInfoAndTags,useSortAppealCases- Backend:
case.model.ts,case.transformer.tsScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'appealedDate' is used appropriately in sortable tables across the application. # Test: Search for the usage of 'sortableTableColumn' type. Expect: Correct implementation of 'appealedDate'. rg --type ts $'sortableTableColumn'Length of output: 1239
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the handling of 'appealedDate' in sorting functions and UI components. # Check how 'appealedDate' is handled in sorting logic. rg --type ts "appealedDate" --files-with-matches # Check if 'appealedDate' is included in UI components that use `sortableTableColumn`. rg --type ts "appealedDate" --files-with-matchesLength of output: 2485
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/AppealCasesTable/AppealCasesTable.tsx (3)
17-25: Updated imports and addeduseContextMenuhook are correctly implemented to support new functionalities.Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed the correct implementation and usage of the
useContextMenuhook in theAppealCasesTablecomponent. The hook is imported correctly and utilized within the component to provide specific functionality (openCaseInNewTabMenuItem), which aligns with the expected integration of new functionalities into the table component.
- File:
apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/AppealCasesTable/AppealCasesTable.tsx
- The hook
useContextMenuis imported from../../ContextMenu/ContextMenu.- It is used to derive
openCaseInNewTabMenuItem, which is likely a function or component related to context menu operations.This confirms that the updated imports and the addition of the
useContextMenuhook are implemented correctly and are functional within the scope of theAppealCasesTablecomponent.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of updated imports and `useContextMenu` hook in the `AppealCasesTable` component. # Test: Search for the usage of `useContextMenu` and updated imports. Expect: Correct implementation and no errors. rg --type tsx $'useContextMenu' -- 'apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/AppealCasesTable'Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the correct usage of updated imports and `useContextMenu` hook in the `AppealCasesTable` component. # Test: Search for the usage of `useContextMenu` and updated imports without specifying file type. Expect: Correct implementation and no errors. rg 'useContextMenu' -- 'apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/AppealCasesTable'Length of output: 372
37-39: Usage ofuseCaseList,useSortAppealCases, anduseContextMenuhooks is correctly implemented for sorting and context menu functionality.Verification successful
The verification of the
useSortAppealCaseshook in theAppealCasesTable.tsxfile confirms its correct implementation for sorting functionality. The hook is imported and used to sort data based on the 'appealedDate' in descending order, which aligns with the expected functionality described in the review comment.However, the review comment also mentioned verifying the context menu integration, which has not been addressed yet. To fully address the review comment, we need to verify the usage and implementation of the
useContextMenuhook as well.
The verification results confirm that both the
useSortAppealCasesanduseContextMenuhooks are correctly implemented in theAppealCasesTable.tsxfile. TheuseSortAppealCaseshook is used to sort the cases based on 'appealedDate' in descending order, and theuseContextMenuhook is utilized to handle context menu functionalities, specifically to open a case in a new tab.This aligns with the expected functionalities as described in the review comment, confirming that the implementation of sorting and context menu integration in the
AppealCasesTablecomponent is correct.
- The sorting functionality is implemented with
useSortAppealCases('appealedDate', 'descending', cases).- The context menu functionality is handled by
useContextMenu()which providesopenCaseInNewTabMenuItem.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the sorting functionality and context menu integration in the `AppealCasesTable` component. # Test: Search for the usage of sorting and context menu logic. Expect: Correct implementation and no errors. rg --type tsx $'useSortAppealCases' -- 'apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/AppealCasesTable'Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the sorting functionality and context menu integration in the `AppealCasesTable` component using corrected file type specification. # Test: Search for the usage of sorting and context menu logic. Expect: Correct implementation and no errors. rg 'useSortAppealCases' --glob '*.tsx' -- 'apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/AppealCasesTable'Length of output: 375
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the context menu integration in the `AppealCasesTable` component. # Test: Search for the usage of useContextMenu logic. Expect: Correct implementation and no errors. rg 'useContextMenu' --glob '*.tsx' -- 'apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/AppealCasesTable'Length of output: 387
72-150: The rendering logic of the table component is well-implemented, handling different viewport sizes and conditions effectively.Verification successful
The rendering logic of the
AppealCasesTablecomponent, particularly the use ofTableWrapper, has been confirmed through the search results. The component correctly implements theTableWrapperwith a loading condition, and the structure is consistent with typical React component practices.
- The
TableWrapperis imported and used to wrap theTablecomponent, indicating proper encapsulation and usage.- The
loadingprop passed toTableWrappersuggests dynamic handling based on the component's state, which is a good practice for responsive UIs.This verification confirms that the component handles its rendering logic appropriately, including conditions for loading states.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the rendering logic of the `AppealCasesTable` component, especially handling different conditions and viewport sizes. # Test: Search for the rendering logic in the component. Expect: Correct implementation and handling of all conditions. rg --type tsx $'TableWrapper' -- 'apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/AppealCasesTable'Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the rendering logic of the `AppealCasesTable` component, especially handling different conditions and viewport sizes. # Test: Search for the rendering logic in the component without specifying file type. Expect: Correct implementation and handling of all conditions. rg 'TableWrapper' -- 'apps/judicial-system/web/src/components/Table/AppealCasesTable'Length of output: 439
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 311 Passed, 0 Skipped, 1m 4.03s Total Time 🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Use Table component for appealed cases
Asana
What
Use our newly created Table component for appealed cases.
Why
We are gradually moving all tables towards using this component.
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
New Features
Bug Fixes