Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(application-system): Fix accident notification data #16954

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 20, 2024

Conversation

norda-gunni
Copy link
Member

@norda-gunni norda-gunni commented Nov 20, 2024

...

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

Fix switched values in accident-notification

Why

So the correct values will be in the correct place

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved handling of employer information in accident notifications.
    • Enhanced mapping for reporting entities to streamline data extraction.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted mapping for specific notification types to ensure accurate reporting.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined the extraction process for company and representative details to improve code clarity and reduce redundancy.

@norda-gunni norda-gunni requested a review from a team as a code owner November 20, 2024 11:53
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the accident-notification-v2.utils.ts file, specifically updating the mapping of reporting entities and refining the getEmployer function. The mapping for certain enum values has been altered, and the function now utilizes destructuring to simplify the extraction of company and representative information from the answers object. The return structure for employer information has been adjusted accordingly. The getAttachments function remains unchanged, maintaining its existing logic.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/... Updated reportingForMap for specific enum values and refactored getEmployer for clarity and efficiency. The getAttachments function remains unchanged.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix(accident-notification): improve representative handling (#16669) #16670: This PR modifies the accident-notification-v2.utils.ts file, specifically enhancing the logic of the getEmployer function, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that also focuses on the accident-notification-v2.utils.ts file and the handling of employer information.
  • fix(accident-notification): dates coming to sjukra #16713: This PR also involves changes to the accident-notification-v2.utils.ts file, focusing on enhancing type safety and error handling, which complements the refactoring and improvements made in the main PR regarding the extraction of employer information.

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • jonnigs
  • HjorturJ

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.41%. Comparing base (5832eb7) to head (88c6d84).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ent-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts 0.00% 12 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16954      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.41%   36.41%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6898     6898              
  Lines      144879   144883       +4     
  Branches    41410    41410              
==========================================
  Hits        52755    52755              
- Misses      92124    92128       +4     
Flag Coverage Δ
web 1.76% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ent-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts 16.04% <0.00%> (-0.36%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5832eb7...88c6d84. Read the comment docs.

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (2)

374-382: LGTM: Clean destructuring implementation

The code effectively extracts company and representative information using object destructuring, improving readability while maintaining null safety.

Consider adding type annotations to the destructured objects for better type safety:

-const { companyName, companyNationalId } = answers.juridicalPerson
-const { name, email, phoneNumber } = answers.applicant
+const { companyName, companyNationalId }: { companyName: string; companyNationalId: string } = answers.juridicalPerson
+const { name, email, phoneNumber }: { name: string; email: string; phoneNumber: string } = answers.applicant

393-404: LGTM: Consistent implementation of employer data handling

The changes maintain a consistent pattern of data extraction and null safety throughout the function.

Consider adding validation for the destructured values:

 const {
   name: companyName = '',
   nationalRegistrationId: companyNationalId = '',
 } = companyInfo
 const { name, email, phoneNumber } = representative
+
+// Add validation to ensure required fields are present
+if (!companyName || !companyNationalId) {
+  throw new Error('Missing required company information')
+}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5832eb7 and 745d6a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)
Learnt from: HjorturJ
PR: island-is/island.is#16111
File: libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts:210-361
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:20.157Z
Learning: In `accident-notification.utils.spec.ts`, the helper functions `getDefaultAttachments` and `getFullBasicAnswers` should not be modified to accept parameters for customizing returned data.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)

53-54: LGTM: Enum mapping correction

The fix properly aligns the reporting entity mappings, resolving the switched values issue mentioned in the PR objectives.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: sa-fix-accident-notification-data
Commit report: b11781c
Test service: web

✅ 0 Failed, 84 Passed, 0 Skipped, 34.92s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

@norda-gunni norda-gunni added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Nov 20, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit c4f2ff4 into main Nov 20, 2024
30 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the sa-fix-accident-notification-data branch November 20, 2024 12:30
norda-gunni added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
kodiakhq bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
)

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
jonnigs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants