fix(samgongustofa): Small cleanup in applications #16946
Conversation
…ptional (it has default value in buildFormPaymentChargeOverviewSection)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications primarily to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Service
participant NotificationSystem
User->>Service: addReview(application, auth)
Service->>Service: Validate buyer
alt Validation successful
Service->>Service: Compare current and previous recipients
Service->>User: Return newly added recipients
Service->>NotificationSystem: Send notifications to recipients
else Validation failed
Service->>User: Return empty array
end
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16946 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 36.41% 36.42% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 6898 6904 +6
Lines 144868 144644 -224
Branches 41403 41324 -79
==========================================
- Hits 52751 52691 -60
+ Misses 92117 91953 -164
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 52 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 6 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 6 Passed Test Services
🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (1)
|
...lication/ui-fields/src/lib/PaymentChargeOverviewFormField/PaymentChargeOverviewFormField.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
libs/application/templates/healthcare-work-permit/src/lib/messages/payment.ts (1)
Similar payment message structures found in transport authority templates that need cleanup
Several transport authority templates contain similar payment message structures that could benefit from cleanup:
change-co-owner-of-vehicle/messages/payment.ts: Contains redundantpaymentChargeOverviewmessageschange-operator-of-vehicle/messages/payment.ts: Contains redundantpaymentChargeOverviewmessagesorder-vehicle-license-plate/messages/payment.ts: Contains redundantpaymentChargeOverviewmessagestransfer-of-vehicle-ownership/messages/payment.ts: Contains redundantpaymentChargeOverviewmessagesThese files have similar patterns of duplicate payment-related messages that could be consolidated, following the cleanup pattern shown in the healthcare work permit template.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-24: Consider extending cleanup to other templates.Since similar message definitions were removed from multiple templates, let's ensure we haven't missed any.
Let me check the actual content of these payment message files to see if they contain similar patterns that need cleanup.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find other templates that might need similar cleanup # Search for similar payment message patterns in other templates rg "paymentChargeOverview.*forPayment|total.*defaultMessage.*['\"]Til greiðslu['\"]" \ --type ts \ libs/application/templatesLength of output: 1636
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of payment message files in transport authority templates for file in $(fd "payment.ts" libs/application/templates/transport-authority --type f); do echo "=== $file ===" cat "$file" echo -e "\n" doneLength of output: 11397
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/order-vehicle-license-plate/src/fields/VehiclesField/VehicleSelectField.tsx (1)
97-98: Consider extracting plate size reset logic.Consider extracting the plate size reset logic into a separate function for better reusability and maintainability.
+ const resetPlateSizes = () => { + setValue('plateSize.frontPlateSize', []) + setValue('plateSize.rearPlateSize', []) + } const onChange = (option: Option) => { // ... existing code ... setValue('pickVehicle.plate', permno) - setValue('plateSize.frontPlateSize', []) - setValue('plateSize.rearPlateSize', []) + resetPlateSizes() setIsLoading(false)libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/VehicleRadioFormField/VehicleRadioFormField.tsx (1)
67-69: Consider grouping related state updates.The plate size reset logic could be better organized by grouping it with other vehicle-related state updates.
setValue(`${field.id}.plate`, permno) setValue(`${field.id}.type`, currentVehicle?.make) setValue(`${field.id}.color`, currentVehicle?.color || undefined) +setValue('plateSize.frontPlateSize', []) +setValue('plateSize.rearPlateSize', []) setValue('vehicleMileage.requireMileage', currentVehicle?.requireMileage) setValue('vehicleMileage.mileageReading', currentVehicle?.mileageReading) -setValue('plateSize.frontPlateSize', []) -setValue('plateSize.rearPlateSize', []) if (permno) setValue('vehicleInfo.plate', permno)libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/FindVehicleFormField/FindVehicleFormField.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-607: Consider improving component modularityThe component handles multiple vehicle types which makes it less reusable and harder to maintain. Consider:
- Extracting vehicle type-specific logic into separate components
- Making form field IDs configurable through props instead of hardcoding
This would improve reusability across different NextJS apps and make the component more maintainable.
Line range hint
566-574: Improve type safety in error handlingReplace the type assertion
(errors as any)?.pickVehiclewith proper typing. Consider:
- Extending the
errorstype to include the expected structure- Using type guards to handle potential undefined values
This would improve type safety and make the code more maintainable.
Example:
interface FormErrors { pickVehicle?: { message: string; }; } // Then use proper typing const errors = errors as FormErrors; if (errors?.pickVehicle) { // Handle error }libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership.service.ts (1)
345-345: Consider adding an error log for unauthorized access.While the early return is correct, adding a log message would help in debugging unauthorized access attempts.
- return [] + this.logger.debug( + `Unauthorized addReview attempt. Expected buyer ${answers.buyer.nationalId}, got ${auth.nationalId}` + ) + return []
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership.service.ts(3 hunks)libs/application/templates/aosh/transfer-of-machine-ownership/src/lib/messages/payment.ts(0 hunks)libs/application/templates/directorate-of-immigration/citizenship/src/lib/messages/payment.ts(0 hunks)libs/application/templates/healthcare-license-certificate/src/lib/messages/payment.ts(0 hunks)libs/application/templates/healthcare-work-permit/src/lib/messages/payment.ts(1 hunks)libs/application/templates/id-card/src/lib/messages/payment.ts(0 hunks)libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/dataProviders/index.ts(2 hunks)libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/forms/MortgageCertificateForm.ts(0 hunks)libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/forms/Prerequisites.ts(2 hunks)libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/lib/messages/payment.ts(0 hunks)libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/lib/mortgageCertificateTemplate.ts(2 hunks)libs/application/templates/transport-authority/order-vehicle-license-plate/src/fields/VehiclesField/VehicleSelectField.tsx(1 hunks)libs/application/templates/transport-authority/order-vehicle-license-plate/src/lib/dataSchema.ts(1 hunks)libs/application/templates/university/src/lib/messages/payment.ts(0 hunks)libs/application/types/src/lib/Fields.ts(1 hunks)libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/FindVehicleFormField/FindVehicleFormField.tsx(1 hunks)libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/PaymentChargeOverviewFormField/PaymentChargeOverviewFormField.tsx(2 hunks)libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/VehicleRadioFormField/VehicleRadioFormField.tsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
- libs/application/templates/aosh/transfer-of-machine-ownership/src/lib/messages/payment.ts
- libs/application/templates/directorate-of-immigration/citizenship/src/lib/messages/payment.ts
- libs/application/templates/healthcare-license-certificate/src/lib/messages/payment.ts
- libs/application/templates/id-card/src/lib/messages/payment.ts
- libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/forms/MortgageCertificateForm.ts
- libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/lib/messages/payment.ts
- libs/application/templates/university/src/lib/messages/payment.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (11)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership.service.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/healthcare-work-permit/src/lib/messages/payment.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/dataProviders/index.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/forms/Prerequisites.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/lib/mortgageCertificateTemplate.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/order-vehicle-license-plate/src/fields/VehiclesField/VehicleSelectField.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/order-vehicle-license-plate/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/types/src/lib/Fields.ts (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/FindVehicleFormField/FindVehicleFormField.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/PaymentChargeOverviewFormField/PaymentChargeOverviewFormField.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/VehicleRadioFormField/VehicleRadioFormField.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (2)
libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/dataProviders/index.ts (1)
Learnt from: norda-gunni
PR: island-is/island.is#16471
File: libs/application/templates/driving-license/src/forms/prerequisites/sectionExternalData.ts:69-72
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:20.157Z
Learning: In `libs/application/templates/driving-license/src/forms/prerequisites/sectionExternalData.ts`, the `MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi` is not a replacement for `SyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi`; both providers should be included in the `dataProviders` array.
libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/forms/Prerequisites.ts (1)
Learnt from: norda-gunni
PR: island-is/island.is#16471
File: libs/application/templates/driving-license/src/forms/prerequisites/sectionExternalData.ts:69-72
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:20.157Z
Learning: In `libs/application/templates/driving-license/src/forms/prerequisites/sectionExternalData.ts`, the `MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi` is not a replacement for `SyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi`; both providers should be included in the `dataProviders` array.
🔇 Additional comments (16)
libs/application/templates/healthcare-work-permit/src/lib/messages/payment.ts (1)
Line range hint 1-24: LGTM! Verify message usage.
The removal of duplicate payment messages is a good cleanup, as these have default values in buildFormPaymentChargeOverviewSection.
Let's verify no components are still referencing the removed messages:
✅ Verification successful
Removal of payment messages is safe and verified
The search results confirm that:
- No references to the removed message IDs exist in the healthcare-work-permit template
- The removed messages were template-specific and not shared across templates
- Other transport-authority templates maintain their own message definitions with different namespaces (ta.tvo, ta.ovlp, etc.)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining references to the removed message IDs
# Check for any remaining usage of the removed message IDs
rg "hwp\.application:payment\.paymentChargeOverview\.(forPayment|total)" \
--type ts \
--type tsx
Length of output: 123
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any remaining references to the removed message IDs with correct ripgrep options
# Check for any remaining usage of the removed message IDs in TypeScript files
rg "hwp\.application:payment\.paymentChargeOverview\.(forPayment|total)" \
-t ts
# Also search for any direct references to these message keys in the codebase
rg "paymentChargeOverview\.(forPayment|total)" \
-t ts
# Search for any PaymentChargeOverviewField usage in the healthcare-work-permit template
fd "\.tsx?$" libs/application/templates/healthcare-work-permit -x rg -l "PaymentChargeOverviewField"
Length of output: 3194
libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/dataProviders/index.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM! Clean import addition
The import follows TypeScript best practices and supports effective tree-shaking.
16-22: Verify mock API integration
The mock API configuration looks good and follows the established pattern. Both mock and real payment catalog APIs coexist as recommended.
Let's verify the integration:
✅ Verification successful
Mock API integration is properly configured
The codebase analysis confirms that both the real payment catalog API (SyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi) and mock API (MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi) are correctly configured and used together in the application template. The mock API follows the established pattern documented in the template API modules README, with proper configuration for the SYSLUMENN organization. Both APIs are properly integrated in the prerequisites form and template configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that both APIs are properly integrated in the application template
# Check if both APIs are used in the prerequisites form
ast-grep --pattern 'dataProviders: [
$$$
SyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi,
$$$
MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi,
$$$
]'
# Verify the mock API is used in test files
rg -t ts "MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi" -g "*test*" -g "*spec*"
Length of output: 200
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the API integration
# Check where SyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi is used
rg "SyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi" -A 5 -B 5
# Check for any payment catalog API usage patterns
rg "PaymentCatalogApi" -A 5 -B 5
# Look for test files related to payment catalog
fd "payment.*\.(spec|test)\.(ts|tsx)$"
# Check the dataProviders configuration
ast-grep --pattern 'dataProviders = {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 279081
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/order-vehicle-license-plate/src/lib/dataSchema.ts (1)
14-21: LGTM! The validation logic correctly ensures at least one plate size is selected.
The refinement implementation effectively validates that either frontPlateSize or rearPlateSize must be non-empty, which aligns with the PR objectives. The schema is also properly exported for reuse across different NextJS apps.
Let's verify if this validation is consistently used across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
The plateSize validation is correctly implemented and consistently used across the codebase
Based on the codebase analysis:
- The Zod schema validation in
dataSchema.tsensures at least one plate size is selected (front or rear) - The validation is consistently used in form components (
PickPlateSize.tsx,VehicleSelectField.tsx, etc.) - The plateSize field is properly handled in the backend services for order processing
- Error messages and UI components properly reflect the validation state
The implementation aligns with the PR objectives and is used consistently throughout the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of plateSize validation
# Look for any other validation logic related to plateSize that might conflict
# Search for plateSize validation patterns
rg -A 3 "plateSize.*validate|validate.*plateSize"
# Search for plateSize field usage
ast-grep --pattern 'plateSize: {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for plateSize usage and validation
# Search for plateSize in the codebase
rg -g '!{dist,build}/*' -A 5 'plateSize'
# Search for any Zod schema validation related to plateSize
ast-grep --pattern 'plateSize: z.$$$'
# Look for any test files that might validate plateSize
fd -g '*test*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' --exec rg -l 'plateSize'
Length of output: 37848
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/PaymentChargeOverviewFormField/PaymentChargeOverviewFormField.tsx (3)
49-50: Move the conditional check outside the Text component
To prevent unnecessary margin when there's no text, consider moving the conditional check outside the Text component.
Here's the suggested change:
- <Text variant="h5">
- {field.forPaymentLabel &&
- formatText(field.forPaymentLabel, application, formatMessage)}
- </Text>
+ {field.forPaymentLabel && (
+ <Text variant="h5">
+ {formatText(field.forPaymentLabel, application, formatMessage)}
+ </Text>
+ )}75-76: Move the conditional check outside the Text component
Similar to the above, move the conditional check outside the Text component to prevent unnecessary margin.
Here's the suggested change:
- <Text variant="h5">
- {field.totalLabel &&
- formatText(field.totalLabel, application, formatMessage)}
- </Text>
+ {field.totalLabel && (
+ <Text variant="h5">
+ {formatText(field.totalLabel, application, formatMessage)}
+ </Text>
+ )}Line range hint 1-89: Implementation looks good overall!
The component is well-structured with:
- Proper TypeScript usage with well-defined types
- Reusable design using shared UI components
- Clean imports enabling effective tree-shaking
- Clear and maintainable logic for payment charge calculations
libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/forms/Prerequisites.ts (2)
14-14: LGTM! Clean import addition.
The import follows TypeScript best practices and maintains effective tree-shaking capabilities.
64-67: LGTM! Correctly implements mockable payment feature.
The implementation correctly follows the established pattern by:
- Keeping both the mock and real payment catalog APIs
- Maintaining consistency with empty titles
- Following the same provider structure as other data providers
This aligns with the previous learning about maintaining both providers in the system.
libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/lib/mortgageCertificateTemplate.ts (2)
24-24: LGTM! Verify mock API implementation.
The import addition follows the established pattern and naming conventions.
Let's verify the mock API implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Mock API implementation verified and properly configured
The MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi is correctly implemented as a configured instance of the base MockablePaymentCatalogApi with:
- Proper organization ID configuration for SYSLUMENN
- Correct external data ID for payment tracking
- Appropriate usage in Prerequisites form for payment processing
- Implementation follows the documented pattern for payment mocking in the template API modules
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the mock API implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi {
$$$
}'
# Verify test coverage
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts . | xargs rg "MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi"
Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for the mock API implementation
rg -l "MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi"
# Search for the implementation pattern with more context
rg "class.*MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi" -A 10
# Check the dataProviders directory content
fd . "dataProviders"
Length of output: 934
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation in the dataProviders index file
rg "MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi" libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/dataProviders/index.ts -A 10
# Check if this is a shared implementation
cat libs/application/template-api-modules/README.md
# Check the usage in Prerequisites form
rg "MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi" libs/application/templates/mortgage-certificate/src/forms/Prerequisites.ts -A 5
Length of output: 16609
88-93: Clarify the coexistence of both payment catalog APIs.
While the addition follows the correct pattern, having both SyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi and MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi in the same configuration might lead to confusion. Consider:
- Adding a comment explaining when each API is used
- Using environment-based conditional logic to include only one API
Let's check how these APIs are used:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Both payment catalog APIs are intentionally included for mock payment functionality
The coexistence of both APIs is by design, as part of a mock payment feature implementation. The system includes a UI component with a "Enable mock payment" toggle that allows switching between real and mock payment APIs during testing or development. This is controlled through:
- A feature flag system (
getApplicationFeatureFlags) - A dedicated mock payment configuration (
MOCKPAYMENTconstant) - UI controls for toggling between real and mock implementations
No changes are needed as this is an intentional implementation pattern for testing and development purposes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for environment-based API selection
rg -A 5 "SyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi|MockableSyslumadurPaymentCatalogApi" --type ts
# Look for potential configuration handling
fd -e ts . | xargs rg "process\.env.*(_ENV|NODE_ENV|ENVIRONMENT)"
Length of output: 42251
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for environment-based configuration or feature flags that might control API selection
rg -A 5 "getApplicationFeatureFlags|getFeatureFlags|isFeatureEnabled" --type ts
# Look for any configuration or initialization of these APIs
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = $$$PaymentCatalogApi.configure({
$$$
})'
Length of output: 22468
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for feature flags related to mockable payment
rg -A 5 "MOCK.*PAYMENT|ALLOW.*MOCK|ENABLE.*MOCK" --type ts
# Look for any conditional logic around these APIs
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($$$) {
$$$PaymentCatalogApi$$$
}'
Length of output: 4300
libs/application/templates/transport-authority/order-vehicle-license-plate/src/fields/VehiclesField/VehicleSelectField.tsx (1)
90-96: LGTM! Improved state management logic.
The separation of permno determination and state updates improves code clarity and maintainability.
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/VehicleRadioFormField/VehicleRadioFormField.tsx (1)
67-69: Verify plateSize object structure existence.
The code assumes the existence of a plateSize object with frontPlateSize and rearPlateSize fields. While the logic to clear these fields is correct, we should ensure this structure is properly initialized.
✅ Verification successful
The plateSize object structure is properly defined and used throughout the codebase.
The search results confirm that the plateSize object structure with frontPlateSize and rearPlateSize fields is well-established in the codebase:
- It's defined in the data schema (dataSchema.ts) using Zod:
plateSize: z.object({
frontPlateSize: z.array(z.string()),
rearPlateSize: z.array(z.string())
})- It's consistently used across multiple components and services
- The structure is referenced in GraphQL DTOs, form fields, and validation logic
- The same structure is used in other components that handle plate size resets
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for plateSize object initialization or type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
plateSize: {
frontPlateSize: $_
rearPlateSize: $_
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for plateSize-related type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = {
$$$
plateSize: $_
$$$
}'
# Also search for plateSize in interface definitions with a more flexible pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
plateSize: $_
$$$
}'
# Search for actual usage of plateSize in the codebase
rg "plateSize" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 34562
libs/application/ui-fields/src/lib/FindVehicleFormField/FindVehicleFormField.tsx (1)
253-255: LGTM: Plate size clearing implementation
The implementation correctly clears both front and rear plate sizes when a new vehicle is selected.
Let's verify that these fields are properly defined in the form schema:
✅ Verification successful
Plate size fields are properly defined and used consistently
The verification confirms that:
- The plate size fields are properly defined in the form schema (
dataSchema.ts) with the correct structure:plateSize.frontPlateSizeandplateSize.rearPlateSizeas arrays of strings - The same field clearing pattern is consistently used across multiple components in the codebase
- The fields are properly referenced in the form configuration and validation logic
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if plateSize fields are defined in the form schema
rg -A 2 'plateSize[^a-zA-Z]'
Length of output: 21580
libs/application/types/src/lib/Fields.ts (1)
520-521: LGTM! The changes align with the PR objectives.
The modification to make forPaymentLabel and totalLabel optional is appropriate since these fields have default values in buildFormPaymentChargeOverviewSection.
Let's verify that this change doesn't break existing implementations:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! Making these fields optional is safe and aligns with the codebase
The verification shows that:
- All usages of
PaymentChargeOverviewFieldprovide default values for these labels inbuildFormPaymentChargeOverviewSection - All direct implementations (transport-authority templates) explicitly set both labels
- The component's stories demonstrate usage both with and without these labels
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct usage of PaymentChargeOverviewField to ensure no code relies on these fields being required
ast-grep --pattern 'PaymentChargeOverviewField = {
$$$
forPaymentLabel: $_
$$$
}'
ast-grep --pattern 'PaymentChargeOverviewField = {
$$$
totalLabel: $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find usages of PaymentChargeOverviewField
# First, find direct references to the type
rg "PaymentChargeOverviewField" -A 5 -B 5
# Also search for any object literals that set these properties
rg "forPaymentLabel:|totalLabel:" -A 2 -B 2
# Check if there are any test files that might be using these fields
fd "test|spec" -e ts -e tsx --exec rg -l "PaymentChargeOverviewField|forPaymentLabel|totalLabel" {}
Length of output: 32647
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership.service.ts (1)
336-336: LGTM! Return type change improves debuggability.
The change from Promise<void> to Promise<Array<EmailRecipient>> enhances transparency by making the notification recipients visible to callers.
...s/transport-authority/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership/transfer-of-vehicle-ownership.service.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
johannaagma
added
the
deprecated:automerge
* Make fields forPaymentLabel and totalLabel in PaymentChargeOverview optional (it has default value in buildFormPaymentChargeOverviewSection) * Add mockable payment to MortgageCertificate * Return recipientList on addReview action for TransferOfVehicleOwnership * Add validation to plateSize field to make sure either front or rear is selected * Make sure to clear the plateSize field when switching vehicle value * Cleanup * Cleanup check for oldEntry --------- Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
What
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
These updates aim to enhance user experience and improve system reliability.