-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(application-system): Fix accident notification work accident subtype #17077
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updating the logic for retrieving accident types from the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (1)libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)Pattern
📓 Learnings (1)libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)
🔇 Additional comments (3)libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (3)Line range hint The code demonstrates good TypeScript practices:
The path change from 'accidentType.answer' to 'accidentType.radioButton' might affect existing records. Ensure that:
Let's verify the usage of this path across the codebase: ✅ Verification successfulPath change is consistent across the codebase The verification shows that:
This indicates a complete migration to the new path structure with no legacy references remaining. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of the old and new paths
echo "Checking for old path usage..."
rg "accidentType\.answer" -t ts
echo "Checking for new path usage..."
rg "accidentType\.radioButton" -t ts
Length of output: 1544 Line range hint The path change to 'accidentType.radioButton' maintains consistency with the getAccidentTypes function. However, verify that all code paths handle undefined/null values appropriately. Let's verify the error handling: ✅ Verification successfulPath usage and null checks are properly implemented After reviewing the codebase, I can confirm that:
The error handling is robust and consistent throughout the codebase, with similar patterns used in other functions like 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for null checks and error handling around accidentType usage
ast-grep --pattern 'accidentType = getValueViaPath<$_>($_, $path)
$$$
if (!accidentType) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 109 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's search for getValueViaPath usage with accidentType and error handling
rg -A 5 "getValueViaPath.*accidentType"
# Also search for the specific function mentioned in the review
rg -A 10 "function getEmployer"
# And let's look at the getAccidentTypes function for comparison
rg -A 10 "function getAccidentTypes"
Length of output: 114 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for the file content
cat libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts
# Also search for any getValueViaPath usage in this directory
rg "getValueViaPath" libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/
Length of output: 18873 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17077 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 35.69% 35.69%
=======================================
Files 6938 6938
Lines 147105 147105
Branches 41822 41822
=======================================
Hits 52516 52516
Misses 94589 94589
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 3 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 3 Passed Test Services
|
...
Attach a link to issue if relevant
What
reference radio field rather than answer in the accident type field
Why
This fill fix missing work accident subtypes
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit