Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(application-system): Fix accident notification work accident subtype #17077

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

norda-gunni
Copy link
Member

@norda-gunni norda-gunni commented Nov 28, 2024

...

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

reference radio field rather than answer in the accident type field

Why

This fill fix missing work accident subtypes

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated the method for retrieving accident types to ensure accurate processing of user input.
    • Adjusted the employer data extraction logic to align with the new accident type retrieval method.

@norda-gunni norda-gunni requested a review from a team as a code owner November 28, 2024 13:50
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updating the logic for retrieving accident types from the answers object in the accident-notification-v2.utils.ts file. The path for accessing the accidentType has been modified from 'accidentType.answer' to 'accidentType.radioButton'. This adjustment affects both the getAccidentTypes and getEmployer functions, ensuring that the retrieval of accident types is consistent across the application.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts Updated paths for accessing accidentType in getAccidentTypes and getEmployer functions.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

automerge

Suggested reviewers

  • Toti91
  • HjorturJ

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a313ad and 20e8b77.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
📓 Learnings (1)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (1)
Learnt from: HjorturJ
PR: island-is/island.is#16111
File: libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification.utils.spec.ts:210-361
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:20.157Z
Learning: In `accident-notification.utils.spec.ts`, the helper functions `getDefaultAttachments` and `getFullBasicAnswers` should not be modified to accept parameters for customizing returned data.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts (3)

Line range hint 1-24: Well-structured TypeScript implementation

The code demonstrates good TypeScript practices:

  • Proper type imports and annotations
  • Named exports for better tree-shaking
  • Clear type definitions for function parameters and return types

113-113: Verify data migration for existing records

The path change from 'accidentType.answer' to 'accidentType.radioButton' might affect existing records. Ensure that:

  1. Data migration is handled for existing records
  2. The UI component change is reflected in all relevant forms

Let's verify the usage of this path across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Path change is consistent across the codebase

The verification shows that:

  • No occurrences of the old path 'accidentType.answer' were found
  • The new path 'accidentType.radioButton' is consistently used across:
    • Form definitions
    • UI components
    • Utility functions
    • Type-specific accident checks

This indicates a complete migration to the new path structure with no legacy references remaining.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of the old and new paths
echo "Checking for old path usage..."
rg "accidentType\.answer" -t ts
echo "Checking for new path usage..."
rg "accidentType\.radioButton" -t ts

Length of output: 1544


Line range hint 350-353: Ensure consistent path usage in getEmployer function

The path change to 'accidentType.radioButton' maintains consistency with the getAccidentTypes function. However, verify that all code paths handle undefined/null values appropriately.

Let's verify the error handling:

✅ Verification successful

Path usage and null checks are properly implemented

After reviewing the codebase, I can confirm that:

  1. The getEmployer function correctly uses accidentType.radioButton path, consistent with getAccidentTypes
  2. The code properly handles undefined/null values through multiple checks:
    • Checks for undefined accidentType
    • Validates company info and representative data
    • Has appropriate fallback logic for different scenarios

The error handling is robust and consistent throughout the codebase, with similar patterns used in other functions like getAccidentTypes, getAtWork, and getAtSailorWork.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for null checks and error handling around accidentType usage
ast-grep --pattern 'accidentType = getValueViaPath<$_>($_, $path)
  $$$
  if (!accidentType) {
    $$$
  }'

Length of output: 109


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for getValueViaPath usage with accidentType and error handling
rg -A 5 "getValueViaPath.*accidentType" 

# Also search for the specific function mentioned in the review
rg -A 10 "function getEmployer"

# And let's look at the getAccidentTypes function for comparison
rg -A 10 "function getAccidentTypes"

Length of output: 114


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for the file content
cat libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts

# Also search for any getValueViaPath usage in this directory
rg "getValueViaPath" libs/application/template-api-modules/src/lib/modules/templates/accident-notification/

Length of output: 18873


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.69%. Comparing base (6a313ad) to head (20e8b77).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #17077   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   35.69%   35.69%           
=======================================
  Files        6938     6938           
  Lines      147105   147105           
  Branches    41822    41822           
=======================================
  Hits        52516    52516           
  Misses      94589    94589           
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.34% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 38.73% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
application-template-api-modules 27.79% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ent-notification/accident-notification-v2.utils.ts 15.57% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6a313ad...20e8b77. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

Datadog Report

All test runs ebd57be 🔗

3 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 3 Passed
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 4 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.38s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 40 0 2m 19.03s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 118 0 2m 4.26s 1 no change Link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants