fix(my-pages): wrap tag #16675
fix(my-pages): wrap tag #16675
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/service-portal/core/src/components/ActionCard/ActionCard.tsx (1)
Line range hint
20-73: Component structure aligns well with library guidelines.The
ActionCardcomponent follows best practices for reusable library components:
- Well-defined TypeScript props interface
- Flexible and customizable design
- Clean import structure for effective tree-shaking
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
libs/service-portal/core/src/components/ActionCard/ActionCard.tsx(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
libs/service-portal/core/src/components/ActionCard/ActionCard.tsx (1)
Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
- TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
- Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."
🔇 Additional comments (3)
libs/service-portal/core/src/components/ActionCard/ActionCard.tsx (3)
14-14: LGTM! Import organization looks good.
The import organization follows common practices and maintains readability.
18-18: LGTM! Style import placement is appropriate.
The style import placement follows common practices by keeping styles after regular imports.
352-352: The flexWrap addition looks good but needs visual verification.
The addition of flexWrap is a good solution to prevent text overflow. This change aligns with the PR objective and maintains component responsiveness.
Please verify the visual appearance in the following scenarios:
- With very long titles
- With both title and tags present
- In different viewport sizes
Would you be able to provide screenshots of these scenarios to confirm the fix works as expected?
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16675 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 36.67% 36.67% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 6859 6859
Lines 142769 142780 +11
Branches 40685 40714 +29
==========================================
Hits 52364 52364
- Misses 90405 90416 +11
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 2 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 1 Passed Test Services
|
My pages - Action card
What
Wrap tag, was going out of box if title text was too long
Why
Specify why you need to achieve this
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores