Remove duplicate status checks from dependent S6 services

[lmagyar]

Proposed Changes

Minor code quality improvement.

The proxy and taildrop services are waiting for post-tailscaled, so move the status checks from the beginning of proxy and taildrop to the end of post-tailscaled.

Related Issues

[seagyn]

@lmagyar Are you able to add labels to this? I see it's the only action that fails. I'd like to see funnel getting implemented.

[frenck]

@lmagyar Are you able to add labels to this? I see it's the only action that fails. I'd like to see funnel getting implemented.

No, that is not how GitHub works, nor is that a concern or limiting factor at this point.

../Frenck

[seagyn]

Sorry, I was referring to this:

With the hope that if all the checks were passing before pinging you to ask what is preventing something like this from going in? I'm mainly interested in #197

[frenck]

I know what you are referring too... but your comment makes no sense, and only shows you have no clue on how GitHub even works...

We all have interest in many things. Pinging won't help either. If anything, a ping makes me skip things on purpose, as I don't want / will lure myself into a system of "handling the loudest".

Just be patient please. 🙏

../Frenck

[seagyn]

I'm sorry Frank, I'm not sure why their is aggression here after a simple question not even directed at you. I know very well how GitHub works, thanks.

I won't hold my breath especially after a threat like that. Literally no one was putting pressure but purely stating a desire.

Cheers.

[frenck]

A threat / aggression? Are you ok? :)

Don't take it so heavy. I am just explaining that you comment on labels didn't make sense, as a PR contributor/author can't set them, thus you might not be aware how GitHub works.

Additionally you mentioned about pinging, but that is something that can be demanding, even when not meant that way. 🤷‍♂️

There is no aggression or mad face from my end at all here 😕

../Frenck

[seagyn]

I'm ok, thanks.

You first response is an overarching statement that I have no idea how GitHub works when a "PR contributors cannot add labels and this isn't the blocker for this. I'll give feedback in due course." Is much less aggressive.

Anyway, thanks for all your open source projects and contributions. There was no intention to put pressure on you at all but rather to see if I could help this along in anyway.

Cheers.

[frenck]

You first response is an overarching statement

Is much less aggressive.

Sorry, are you mocking me right now? Are you bored or like to mess with people? As in, approach the world more positively by maybe not assuming assume the bad in people.

that I have no idea how GitHub works

Sorry, well, if you knew, that makes your initial question weird as hell, as it could not be fulfilled by the person you're asked to add a label... 🤷 I'm not understanding the point you make in any of your follow-ups in that case.

There was no intention to put pressure on you at all but rather to see if I could help this along in anyway.

I don't see how any of the above would have achieved that. To be fair, it only raised noise 🤷

../Frenck

[seagyn]

Cool got it. Don't raise any questions in this repo 👍

[frenck]

Really now? haha, that is what you took from it?

But if the above is how you would communicate further, I would definitely not mind your policy on that 😄

[lmagyar]

not stale

[lmagyar]

not stale

[lmagyar]

not stale

[frenck]

Thanks, @lmagyar 👍

../Frenck