-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 193
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix .setup file #399
Fix .setup file #399
Conversation
This reverts commit a92f21a.
* The org.eclipse.test feature doesn't need to be installed into the IDE, so I removed that. * We only need to make sure that the feature can be found when the target platform is resolved, so I added the required p2 repos to the relevant repository lists. Signed-off-by: Felix Dorner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Dorner <[email protected]>
Only Groovy 2.1 is required to build. |
Eclipse Test Framework (aka org.eclipse.test.feature.group) is required in the target platform. |
That's not the issue here. It doesn't hurt to have them all and that's how it was set up before too..
We can of course add it explicitly, but IIUC it's not actually required. The jdt builder tests just need the eclipse performance tests plugin, and by adding the required update sites, the required plugins will be pulled in automatically, even if we don't mention them in our requirements. |
It doesn't hurt to add more than is needed. But why would we?
|
I don't know, maybe because someone wants to try and compile it with a
newer version? 2.1 is pretty old.. But again, this is not the issue here...
…On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Eric Milles ***@***.***> wrote:
It doesn't hurt to add more than is needed. But why would we?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#399 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAK9z0Bl3qcvBUnIwc9uLXPSk6548lzqks5s9bC-gaJpZM4Q2CE_>
.
--
Linux. The choice of a GNU generation.
|
So I removed the extras and you are putting them back. To me that's an issue. I don't like to have merge requests that revert desired changes.
|
Eric, feel free to do what you want. You see what's needed to fix it.
…On Dec 5, 2017 22:20, "Eric Milles" ***@***.***> wrote:
So I removed the extras and you are putting them back. To me that's an
issue. I don't like to have merge requests that revert desired changes.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#399 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAK9z_g6upaBJprO3iV1KJPfZIYNohWNks5s9bOVgaJpZM4Q2CE_>
.
|
Fixes for #397 and #398