Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce remaining BigQuery to GA items #686

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 9, 2017

Conversation

dwsupplee
Copy link
Contributor

@dwsupplee dwsupplee commented Sep 25, 2017

Closes: #354, #622

The following items are included in this PR:

  • Job configuration classes have been introduced. beba45d / bbc6c7c
    • Support for dry run.
    • Ability to set labels on a job.
    • More clear configuration of jobs (I hope! Would love some feedback on this before finishing up the rest of the tests/docs).
  • Updates to retry logic. 81315f0
  • Optionally create a table if it does not exist while inserting rows. 59dc30f

/cc @bencromwell Given the issue found before with the way jobs were configured, your feedback on this item would be really wonderful :).

Todos (based on feedback):

  • Update tests
  • Update docs
  • Add load/copy job configuration classes

@dwsupplee dwsupplee added the api: bigquery Issues related to the BigQuery API. label Sep 25, 2017
@dwsupplee dwsupplee requested a review from jdpedrie September 25, 2017 15:57
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Sep 25, 2017
@dwsupplee dwsupplee added the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label Sep 25, 2017
@jdpedrie
Copy link
Contributor

I think this is a definite improvement from a usability standpoint. nice job so far!

@bencromwell
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like a really good change @dwsupplee !

@dwsupplee
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the feedback, it's greatly appreciated :)

@dwsupplee
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @ElliottBrossard, @tswast

This should be ready to review! For the remainder of our upcoming changes please see #644.

@dwsupplee dwsupplee removed the do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. label Sep 29, 2017
@dwsupplee dwsupplee changed the title Introduce job configuration classes Introduce remaining BigQuery to GA items Sep 29, 2017
Copy link

@tswast tswast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love the new config classes!

@dwsupplee dwsupplee merged commit 4c92daf into googleapis:bigquery Oct 9, 2017
dwsupplee added a commit to dwsupplee/gcloud-php that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2017
* introduce job configuration classes

* update tests/docs and add copy/load

* modify retry logic

* add create on insert logic
dwsupplee added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2017
* Run query and wait for it to complete (#604)

* Run query and wait for it to complete

* Document exception on BigQueryClient::runQuery()

* Update snippet test

* Add support for etags on bigquery tables and datasets (#634)

* [BC Break] Switch to standard SQL by default (#640)

* Switch to standard SQL by default

* Fix setting of useLegacySql option

* Fix job config logic

* Address code review

* [BC Break] Implement waitUntilComplete and block while waiting for query results (#642)

* implement waitUntilComplete on job and block waiting for queryResults

* fix getIterator docblock

* Generate BigQuery Job ID on client side with optional prefix (#643)

* address code review

* Introduce remaining BigQuery to GA items (#686)

* introduce job configuration classes

* update tests/docs and add copy/load

* modify retry logic

* add create on insert logic
This was referenced Oct 16, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: bigquery Issues related to the BigQuery API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants