Feature: change summary to include generous deeds (KIDS-1409) #1084
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@TammiLion has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing event tracking related to user interactions with family reflection summaries. Key changes include the addition of a new enumeration value for tracking generous deeds, updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GratefulCubit
participant ReflectAndShareRepository
participant SummaryCubit
User->>GratefulCubit: Donate
GratefulCubit->>ReflectAndShareRepository: incrementGenerousDeeds()
ReflectAndShareRepository-->>GratefulCubit: Update successful
GratefulCubit->>SummaryCubit: Update summary with generous deeds
SummaryCubit-->>User: Display updated summary
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
lib/features/family/features/reflect/domain/models/summary_details.dart (1)
5-5: LGTM! New property added for generous deeds.The
generousDeedsproperty has been correctly added to replacequestionsAsked, which aligns with the PR objectives.Consider making this property
finalif it's not intended to be modified after initialization:- int generousDeeds; + final int generousDeeds;This would enforce immutability and potentially prevent bugs related to unexpected changes to this value.
lib/features/family/features/reflect/bloc/grateful_cubit.dart (1)
127-127: LGTM! The change aligns with the PR objectives.The addition of
_reflectAndShareRepository.incrementGenerousDeeds()correctly implements the requirement to track generous deeds based on donations. This change aligns well with the PR objective of shifting focus from "Questions asked" to "Generous Deeds".Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this line for improved code readability:
+ // Increment the count of generous deeds when a donation is made _reflectAndShareRepository.incrementGenerousDeeds();lib/features/family/features/reflect/domain/reflect_and_share_repository.dart (1)
Line range hint
1-328: Additional changes may be needed to fully meet PR objectives.While the changes to track generous deeds are implemented correctly, there are a few points to consider:
- The
totalQuestionsAskedvariable is still present. Consider if this should be removed or renamed to align with the new focus on generous deeds.- The summary text update from "Questions asked" to "Generous Deeds" is not visible in this file. Ensure this change is implemented in the appropriate UI files.
- Verify that the
incrementGenerousDeeds()method is called every time a donation is made, as per the PR objectives.Consider the following actions:
- Review the usage of
totalQuestionsAskedand update or remove it if necessary.- Ensure the UI files are updated to reflect the new "Generous Deeds" summary.
- Implement logic to call
incrementGenerousDeeds()when a donation is made, if not already done.lib/core/enums/amplitude_events.dart (1)
Line range hint
331-338: Consider adding a comment to group family reflect summary events.To improve readability and maintainability, consider adding a comment to indicate the start of the family reflect summary events group. This would be consistent with other event groupings in the file.
Here's a suggested change:
familyReflectSummaryBackToHome('family_reflect_summary_back_to_home'), gratefulTileSubmitted('grateful_tile_submitted'), gratefulTileSelected('grateful_tile_selected'), + // Family reflect summary events familyReflectSummaryMinutesPlayedClicked( 'family_reflect_summary_minutes_played_clicked', ), familyReflectSummaryQuestionsAskedClicked( 'family_reflect_summary_questions_asked_clicked', ), familyReflectSummaryGenerousDeedsClicked( 'family_reflect_summary_generous_deeds_clicked', ),
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (8)
- lib/core/enums/amplitude_events.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/features/family/features/reflect/bloc/grateful_cubit.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/features/family/features/reflect/bloc/summary_cubit.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/features/family/features/reflect/domain/models/summary_details.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/features/family/features/reflect/domain/reflect_and_share_repository.dart (2 hunks)
- lib/features/family/features/reflect/presentation/pages/summary_screen.dart (2 hunks)
- lib/features/family/shared/design/components/actions/fun_tile.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/features/family/utils/family_app_theme.dart (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (15)
lib/features/family/features/reflect/domain/models/summary_details.dart (1)
1-6: Verify complete transition from "Questions asked" to "Generous Deeds"The changes in this file successfully implement the transition from "Questions asked" to "Generous Deeds" as per the PR objectives. However, to ensure a complete implementation:
Please run the following script to check for any remaining occurrences of "Questions asked" or "questionsAsked" in the codebase that might need updating:
#!/bin/bash # Search for "Questions asked" or "questionsAsked" in the codebase rg --type dart -i 'questions?\s*asked|questionsasked'If any results are found, consider updating them to maintain consistency with this change.
lib/features/family/features/reflect/bloc/summary_cubit.dart (2)
Line range hint
1-24: Verify related changes in other parts of the codebaseWhile the changes in this file look good, please ensure that all related parts of the codebase have been updated accordingly:
- Verify that the
SummaryDetailsclass has been updated to include thegenerousDeedsfield.- Check if any UI components that display the summary have been updated to show "Generous Deeds" instead of "Questions asked".
- Ensure that any tests related to the summary functionality have been updated to reflect these changes.
Run the following script to check for related changes:
15-16: LGTM! Changes align with PR objectives.The modifications to the
initmethod successfully implement the transition from "Questions asked" to "Generous Deeds" as specified in the PR objectives. ThegenerousDeedsvalue is now retrieved and included in theSummaryDetailsobject, which aligns with the requirement to reflect the number of donations made by users.To ensure full compliance with the acceptance criteria, please verify that the
getAmountOfGenerousDeeds()method accurately counts every donation made by users. You can run the following script to check the implementation:Also applies to: 21-21
lib/features/family/features/reflect/presentation/pages/summary_screen.dart (3)
46-48: LGTM: Title text updated to reflect new focus on generosityThe change in the title text accurately reflects the PR's objective to shift focus from "Questions asked" to "Generous Deeds". The new text emphasizes gratitude and generosity, which aligns well with the intended user experience enhancement.
Line range hint
1-101: Overall: Changes successfully implement the new "Generous Deeds" focusThe modifications in this file effectively transition the summary screen from "Questions asked" to "Generous Deeds", aligning perfectly with the PR objectives. Key points:
- The title text now emphasizes gratitude and generosity.
- The FunTile widget has been updated to display generous deeds with appropriate visual changes.
- Analytics events have been adjusted to track the new feature accurately.
These changes should enhance user engagement by showcasing the positive impact of their contributions, as intended in the PR summary and linked issue.
To ensure full compatibility, please verify:
- Backend support for
secretWord.generousDeeds- Proper definition of the new AmplitudeEvents enum value
Once these verifications are complete, the implementation will be fully aligned with the PR objectives.
75-75: LGTM: Analytics event updated for generous deedsThe analytics event has been correctly updated to reflect the new "generous deeds" feature. This ensures proper tracking of user interactions with the new content.
Please confirm that the new event is properly defined in the AmplitudeEvents enum. Run the following script to verify:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of the new AmplitudeEvents enum value # Test: Search for the definition of familyReflectSummaryGenerousDeedsClicked in AmplitudeEvents rg --type dart 'enum AmplitudeEvents' -A 50 | rg 'familyReflectSummaryGenerousDeedsClicked'lib/features/family/features/reflect/bloc/grateful_cubit.dart (1)
Line range hint
1-150: The implementation aligns well with the PR objectives.The change successfully implements the requirement to track generous deeds by incrementing the count when a donation is made. This aligns perfectly with the PR objective of changing the focus from "Questions asked" to "Generous Deeds".
To ensure complete implementation of the PR objectives, we should verify if any UI-related changes are needed to display the "Generous Deeds" count instead of "Questions asked". Let's check for any relevant UI files:
This will help us identify if there are any other files that need to be updated to fully meet the PR objectives.
lib/features/family/shared/design/components/actions/fun_tile.dart (1)
79-102: NewFunTile.redconstructor looks good, but its relevance to PR objectives is unclear.The implementation of the new
FunTile.redconstructor is consistent with existing constructors and uses appropriate error-themed colors. However, this addition doesn't seem to directly relate to the PR objectives of changing the summary screen to display "Generous Deeds".Could you clarify how this new constructor contributes to the "Generous Deeds" feature described in the PR objectives? If it's an unrelated improvement, consider submitting it as a separate PR for easier review and tracking.
Additionally, consider adding documentation for this new constructor to explain its intended use case:
/// Creates a red-themed FunTile, typically used for error or warning states. factory FunTile.red({ // ... (existing parameters) }) { // ... (existing implementation) }lib/features/family/features/reflect/domain/reflect_and_share_repository.dart (3)
15-15: LGTM: New variable for tracking generous deeds.The addition of
_generousDeedsaligns with the PR objective to change the focus from "Questions asked" to "Generous Deeds". The variable is correctly implemented as a private integer and initialized to 0.
24-25: LGTM: Getter method for generous deeds count.The
getAmountOfGenerousDeeds()method provides appropriate access to the private_generousDeedsvariable. The naming is clear and follows Dart conventions.
26-28: LGTM: Method to increment generous deeds, but verify its usage.The
incrementGenerousDeeds()method is correctly implemented to increase the count of generous deeds. However, we need to ensure that this method is called every time a donation is made, as per the PR objectives.To verify the usage of this method, please run the following script:
lib/features/family/utils/family_app_theme.dart (2)
65-65: Approve addition, but question relevance to PR objectives.The addition of
error50constant is consistent with the existing error color scheme. However, this change doesn't seem to directly relate to the PR objectives of modifying the summary screen to display "Generous Deeds".Could you clarify how this color addition contributes to the changes described in the PR objectives? If it's unrelated, consider moving this change to a separate PR focused on theme updates.
68-68: Approve addition, but question relevance to PR objectives.The addition of
error98constant is consistent with the existing error color scheme. However, like theerror50addition, this change doesn't seem to directly relate to the PR objectives of modifying the summary screen to display "Generous Deeds".Could you explain how this color addition contributes to the changes described in the PR objectives? If it's unrelated, consider moving this change to a separate PR focused on theme updates.
lib/core/enums/amplitude_events.dart (2)
Line range hint
1-338: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives.The addition of the
familyReflectSummaryGenerousDeedsClickedenum value successfully supports the PR objective of transitioning the summary screen focus from "Questions asked" to "Generous Deeds". The change is consistent with the existing code structure and naming conventions.With the suggested addition of a comment to group the family reflect summary events, the overall readability and maintainability of the file will be further improved.
These changes effectively contribute to the implementation of the new "Generous Deeds" feature on the summary screen as outlined in the PR objectives.
336-338: LGTM! New enum value aligns with PR objectives.The addition of
familyReflectSummaryGenerousDeedsClickedis consistent with the existing pattern and naming conventions in the file. This new event supports the PR objective of transitioning the summary screen focus from "Questions asked" to "Generous Deeds".To ensure completeness, let's check if any related enum values need to be updated or added:
Verification successful
Verification completed successfully.
The addition of
familyReflectSummaryGenerousDeedsClickedaligns with existing enum values in theamplitude_events.dartfile and follows the established naming conventions. No inconsistencies or missing related enum values were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for existing enum values related to the summary screen rg --type dart 'familyReflectSummary.*Clicked' lib/core/enums/amplitude_events.dartLength of output: 218
lib/features/family/features/reflect/presentation/pages/summary_screen.dart
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
FunTilewith error-themed properties.Bug Fixes
Documentation