Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ref: use baseclass implementation of monitor creation #74806

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2024
Merged

ref: use baseclass implementation of monitor creation #74806

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

asottile-sentry
Copy link
Member

this fixes an error in mypy 1.11 where the baseclass implementation is not compatible

@asottile-sentry asottile-sentry requested review from a team July 23, 2024 23:00
@asottile-sentry asottile-sentry requested a review from a team as a code owner July 23, 2024 23:00
@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 23, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.15%. Comparing base (7f1026a) to head (48a3f1a).
Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #74806       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   57.10%   78.15%   +21.05%     
===========================================
  Files        6728     6738       +10     
  Lines      300098   300470      +372     
  Branches    51618    51672       +54     
===========================================
+ Hits       171376   234838    +63462     
+ Misses     123944    59312    -64632     
- Partials     4778     6320     +1542

see 2011 files with indirect coverage changes

@asottile-sentry asottile-sentry merged commit a745187 into master Jul 24, 2024
48 checks passed
@asottile-sentry asottile-sentry deleted the asottile-no-need-to-override-monitor branch July 24, 2024 13:21
Christinarlong pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2024
@asottile-sentry @Christinarlong
ref: use baseclass implementation of monitor creation (#74806)
ea57061 
this fixes an error in mypy 1.11 where the baseclass implementation is
not compatible

<!-- Describe your PR here. -->
@asottile-sentry asottile-sentry mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2024
Merged
asottile-sentry added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2024
@asottile-sentry
ref: get proper base manager typing (#72221)
89697c3 
an absolute ton of work went into enabling this -- but after this PR
model types / create / update / etc. should mostly be typechecked
whereas they were entirely unchecked (everything `Any`) prior to this.

most of the core problem was that mypy and django-stubs did not
understand our custom `BaseManager` and `BaseQuerySet` since there's a
significant amount of django stuff that goes into making those classes
"real"

fix that involved these issues:

- python/mypy#17402 (worked around)
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2228 (the workaround)

with that fixed, it exposed a handful issues in django-stubs itself:

- typeddjango/django-stubs#2240
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2241
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2244
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2248
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2276
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2281

fixing all of those together exposed around 1k issues in sentry code
itself which was fixed over a number of PRs:
- #75186
- #75108
- #75149
- #75162
- #75150
- #75154
- #75158
- #75148
- #75157
- #75156
- #75152
- #75153
- #75151
- #75113
- #75112
- #75111
- #75110
- #75109
- #75013
- #74641
- #74640
- #73783
- #73787
- #73788
- #73793
- #73791
- #73786
- #73761
- #73742
- #73744
- #73602
- #73596
- #73595
- #72892
- #73589
- #73587
- #73581
- #73580
- #73213
- #73207
- #73206
- #73205
- #73202
- #73198
- #73121
- #73109
- #73073
- #73061
- getsentry/getsentry#14370
- #72965
- #72963
- #72967
- #72877 (eventually was able to remove this when upgrading to mypy
1.11)
- #72948
- #72799
- #72898
- #72899
- #72896
- #72895
- #72903
- #72894
- #72897
- #72893
- #72889
- #72887
- #72888
- #72811
- #72872
- #72813
- #72815
- #72812
- #72808
- #72802
- #72807
- #72809
- #72810
- #72814
- #72816
- #72818
- #72806
- #72801
- #72797
- #72800
- #72798
- #72771
- #72718
- #72719
- #72710
- #72709
- #72706
- #72693
- #72641
- #72591
- #72635


mypy 1.11 also included some important improvements with typechecking
`for model_cls in (M1, M2, M2): ...` which also exposed some problems in
our code. unfortunately upgrading mypy involved fixing a lot of things
as well:
- #75020
- #74982
- #74976
- #74974
- #74972
- #74967
- #74954
- getsentry/getsentry#14739
- getsentry/getsentry#14734
- #74959
- #74958
- #74956
- #74953
- #74955
- #74952
- #74895
- #74892
- #74897
- #74896
- #74893
- #74880
- #74900
- #74902
- #74903
- #74904
- #74899
- #74894
- #74882
- #74881
- #74871
- #74870
- #74855
- #74856
- #74853
- #74857
- #74858
- #74807
- #74805
- #74803
- #74806
- #74798
- #74809
- #74801
- #74804
- #74800
- #74799
- #74725
- #74682
- #74677
- #74680
- #74683
- #74681


needless to say this is probably the largest stacked PR I've ever done
-- and I'm pretty happy with how I was able to split this up into
digestable chunks

<!-- Describe your PR here. -->
roaga pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
@asottile-sentry @roaga
ref: get proper base manager typing (#72221)
2553119 
an absolute ton of work went into enabling this -- but after this PR
model types / create / update / etc. should mostly be typechecked
whereas they were entirely unchecked (everything `Any`) prior to this.

most of the core problem was that mypy and django-stubs did not
understand our custom `BaseManager` and `BaseQuerySet` since there's a
significant amount of django stuff that goes into making those classes
"real"

fix that involved these issues:

- python/mypy#17402 (worked around)
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2228 (the workaround)

with that fixed, it exposed a handful issues in django-stubs itself:

- typeddjango/django-stubs#2240
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2241
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2244
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2248
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2276
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2281

fixing all of those together exposed around 1k issues in sentry code
itself which was fixed over a number of PRs:
- #75186
- #75108
- #75149
- #75162
- #75150
- #75154
- #75158
- #75148
- #75157
- #75156
- #75152
- #75153
- #75151
- #75113
- #75112
- #75111
- #75110
- #75109
- #75013
- #74641
- #74640
- #73783
- #73787
- #73788
- #73793
- #73791
- #73786
- #73761
- #73742
- #73744
- #73602
- #73596
- #73595
- #72892
- #73589
- #73587
- #73581
- #73580
- #73213
- #73207
- #73206
- #73205
- #73202
- #73198
- #73121
- #73109
- #73073
- #73061
- getsentry/getsentry#14370
- #72965
- #72963
- #72967
- #72877 (eventually was able to remove this when upgrading to mypy
1.11)
- #72948
- #72799
- #72898
- #72899
- #72896
- #72895
- #72903
- #72894
- #72897
- #72893
- #72889
- #72887
- #72888
- #72811
- #72872
- #72813
- #72815
- #72812
- #72808
- #72802
- #72807
- #72809
- #72810
- #72814
- #72816
- #72818
- #72806
- #72801
- #72797
- #72800
- #72798
- #72771
- #72718
- #72719
- #72710
- #72709
- #72706
- #72693
- #72641
- #72591
- #72635


mypy 1.11 also included some important improvements with typechecking
`for model_cls in (M1, M2, M2): ...` which also exposed some problems in
our code. unfortunately upgrading mypy involved fixing a lot of things
as well:
- #75020
- #74982
- #74976
- #74974
- #74972
- #74967
- #74954
- getsentry/getsentry#14739
- getsentry/getsentry#14734
- #74959
- #74958
- #74956
- #74953
- #74955
- #74952
- #74895
- #74892
- #74897
- #74896
- #74893
- #74880
- #74900
- #74902
- #74903
- #74904
- #74899
- #74894
- #74882
- #74881
- #74871
- #74870
- #74855
- #74856
- #74853
- #74857
- #74858
- #74807
- #74805
- #74803
- #74806
- #74798
- #74809
- #74801
- #74804
- #74800
- #74799
- #74725
- #74682
- #74677
- #74680
- #74683
- #74681


needless to say this is probably the largest stacked PR I've ever done
-- and I'm pretty happy with how I was able to split this up into
digestable chunks

<!-- Describe your PR here. -->
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 9, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@joshuarli joshuarli joshuarli approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@asottile-sentry @joshuarli