Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

React 15.6 Umbrella #9398

Closed
41 of 49 tasks
flarnie opened this issue Apr 10, 2017 · 16 comments
Closed
41 of 49 tasks

React 15.6 Umbrella #9398

flarnie opened this issue Apr 10, 2017 · 16 comments
Assignees

Comments

@flarnie
Copy link
Contributor

flarnie commented Apr 10, 2017

Update: We just shipped 15.6.0 of react & react-dom! :)

Still ongoing;

  • Fixes for React.addons and the 15.6.0 release of those modules.
  • Follow-up work

React.addons fixes:

Other related items:

  • Document the process for deprecating an API in React Moved to Document the process for deprecating an API in React #10057
  • Can we remove junk code from PropTypes prod build? It doesn't use bundle-collapser so it ships all those method names (e.g. “fbjs/lib/invariant”). This is fixable if you add “-p bundle-collapser/plugin” to browserify call. Additionally, there seems to be some junk invariant() code which is easy to fix if we just turn this into an inlined error. https://unpkg.com/[email protected]/prop-types.min.js
  • Make sure deprecations are on master too

Follow-up issues:


Steps we went through for React 15.6.0;

Preparing the RC:

Done! RC was released.

Testing the RC:

Done! [React 15.6.0 is out.](https://github.com/facebook/react/releases/tag/v15.6.0) - [X] Inspect the UMD builds - [x] Share RC and proposed release date with library authors several weeks in advance - [x] Publish release notes early

Preparing the final release:

Done! [React 15.6.0 is out.](https://github.com/facebook/react/releases/tag/v15.6.0) - [x] Update https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/master/scripts/print-warnings/print-warnings.js (https://github.com//pull/9756) - [x] Share RC with library authors and get folks to try it. - [x] Post a target date for the release. - [x] Triage any issues reported with RC. - [x] https://github.com//issues/9830 - [x] Sync master branch (to test the deprecation downgrade internally at FB)

Doing the release:

  • Release on a Mon-Thur. day
@aweary
Copy link
Contributor

aweary commented Apr 10, 2017

Deprecate React.DOM Factories

For reference, there is existing work on this at #8356

Can we remove junk code from PropTypes prod build? It doesn't use bundle-collapser so it ships all those method names (e.g. “fbjs/lib/invariant”). This is fixable if you add “-p bundle-collapser/plugin” to browserify call. Additionally, there seems to be some junk invariant() code which is easy to fix if we just turn this into an inlined error. https://unpkg.com/[email protected]/prop-types.min.js

I created an issue for this in the new prop-types repo: facebook/prop-types#16

@timdorr
Copy link

timdorr commented Apr 11, 2017

Are we encouraging people to stop using createClass? What about PropTypes? Are we deprecating them as in “they're bad” (nope) or are we just moving them (yes)? Make it clearer.

You'll want to be crystal clear about this. In other projects where they've removed stuff like this, it usually means a death sentence for those features (Responders in Rails come to mind). The important part is noting that those features aren't going away, just how you access them is changing. Maybe drop the "depreciation" wording and replace it with "moving"? And that's not because you're not deprecating those imports, but it's about the kind of message you want to send.

@markspolakovs
Copy link
Contributor

markspolakovs commented Apr 11, 2017

👍 on not calling it "deprecation". The common intuition for "deprecated" is "stuff that we're no longer maintaining and only keeping around to avoid API incompatibilities, and you shouldn't use it anymore" (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deprecation#Software_deprecation). "Moving" sounds a bit better.

@jeremenichelli
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome suggestions by @flarnie, happy to see that more of the bullet points touch communication topics which are way more difficult to embrace than technical stuff sometimes when managing a library that a lot of people uses.

Though I like warnings, I don't know if I prefer the red and error look of a deprecation to catch better the developer's attention.

@aweary
Copy link
Contributor

aweary commented Apr 11, 2017

Awesome suggestions by @flarnie, happy to see that more of the bullet points touch communication topics which are way more difficult to embrace than technical stuff sometimes when managing a library that a lot of people uses.

I completely agree. I think it's especially difficult since most of the React team's core decisions are made via internal discussions at FB, and there hasn't been a sustained effort to communicate these to the OSS community.

I would love to see some work towards making this less opaque (maybe start publishing meeting notes again?), both for consumers, library maintainers, and contributors to the project.

@timdorr
Copy link

timdorr commented Apr 11, 2017

Though I like warnings, I don't know if I prefer the red and error look of a deprecation to catch better the developer's attention.

This is a complete hack and totally should not be what actually is done here, but you can sorta do that with console message styles:

screen shot 2017-04-11 at 12 05 26 pm

Silly, but it could be an idea to pursue to make them visually distinct.

@gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

gaearon commented Apr 11, 2017

Unfortunately won't work in other browsers or Node afaik.

flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react-codemod that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2017
Since we are deprecating the 'React.DOM.*' factories,[1] we want to
provide a codemod so that it's easier for folks to upgrade their code.

This will include an option to use 'React.createFactory' instead of
'React.createElement' in case there is a use case where that is
preferred.

There is one use of `React.DOM.*` that I have seen which is not covered
here - sometimes it has mistakenly been used for Flow typing. In the
cases I have found it is not proper syntax and doesn't seem like
something we should cover with this codemod.

[1]: facebook/react#9398
and facebook/react#8356
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react-codemod that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2017
Since we are deprecating the 'React.DOM.*' factories,[1] we want to
provide a codemod so that it's easier for folks to upgrade their code.

This will include an option to use 'React.createFactory' instead of
'React.createElement' in case there is a use case where that is
preferred.

There is one use of `React.DOM.*` that I have seen which is not covered
here - sometimes it has mistakenly been used for Flow typing. In the
cases I have found it is not proper syntax and doesn't seem like
something we should cover with this codemod.

[1]: facebook/react#9398
and facebook/react#8356
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react-codemod that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2017
Since we are deprecating the 'React.DOM.*' factories,[1] we want to
provide a codemod so that it's easier for folks to upgrade their code.

This will include an option to use 'React.createFactory' instead of
'React.createElement' in case there is a use case where that is
preferred.

There is one use of `React.DOM.*` that I have seen which is not covered
here - sometimes it has mistakenly been used for Flow typing. In the
cases I have found it is not proper syntax and doesn't seem like
something we should cover with this codemod.

[1]: facebook/react#9398
and facebook/react#8356
@flarnie
Copy link
Contributor Author

flarnie commented Apr 20, 2017

"Where does proptypes doc live? It's confusing it's still on React object but inaccessible from the website through search or table of contents. Let's either reinstantiate it or move it fully to the standalone repo. Also it's confusing we're deprecating createClass but it still lives in the docs ("React without ES6") whereas we're just "moving" PropTypes but they're gone from the docs."

flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2017
**what is the change?:**
Adding a section to the change log where we start accumulating
annotations for React v15.6.0.

**why make this change?:**
- Saves us the trouble of writing the change log entry all at once when
  we do the release.
- Adds transparency about what is in the upcoming release, for those who
  aren't following facebook#9398

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue May 1, 2017
**what is the change?:**
Adding a section to the change log where we start accumulating
annotations for React v15.6.0.

**why make this change?:**
- Saves us the trouble of writing the change log entry all at once when
  we do the release.
- Adds transparency about what is in the upcoming release, for those who
  aren't following facebook#9398

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue May 1, 2017
**what is the change?:**
- added missing `#` for commit hashes
- added minor details to two annotations

Thanks to @gaearon for the code review comments.

**why make this change?:**
Consistency and clarity.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue May 2, 2017
**what is the change?:**
We had added hashes to some commit numbers, but ideally only do that
for PRs.

**why make this change?:**
Consistency - this is how github displays those types of links too. PRs
get a '#', and commits don't.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2017
* Add 'unreleased' incremental change log for v15.6.0

**what is the change?:**
Adding a section to the change log where we start accumulating
annotations for React v15.6.0.

**why make this change?:**
- Saves us the trouble of writing the change log entry all at once when
  we do the release.
- Adds transparency about what is in the upcoming release, for those who
  aren't following #9398

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
#9398

* Minor tweaks to v15.6.0 changelog annotation

**what is the change?:**
- added missing `#` for commit hashes
- added minor details to two annotations

Thanks to @gaearon for the code review comments.

**why make this change?:**
Consistency and clarity.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
#9398

* Remove hashes from commit numbers

**what is the change?:**
We had added hashes to some commit numbers, but ideally only do that
for PRs.

**why make this change?:**
Consistency - this is how github displays those types of links too. PRs
get a '#', and commits don't.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue May 3, 2017
Updating the change log~ :)

**issue:**
facebook#9398
This was referenced May 3, 2017
flarnie added a commit that referenced this issue May 9, 2017
**what is the change?:**
Changed a test to look for the warning we added in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/8356/files

**why make this change?:**
To update our tests for new behavior.

**test plan:**
`npm run test`

**issue:**
#9398
flarnie added a commit that referenced this issue May 9, 2017
Updating the change log~ :)

**issue:**
#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2017
**what is the change?:**
removing some comments

**why make this change?:**
The code is basically self explanatory and these comments could get out
of sync.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection, `yarn build` and `yarn test`

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 6, 2017
flarnie added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 6, 2017
Just keeping things updated.

#9398
flarnie added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 6, 2017
* Tweak syntax in rollup build script

@bvaughn and I already discussed this.

**test plan:**
`yarn build`

* Remove JSDoc comments

**what is the change?:**
removing some comments

**why make this change?:**
The code is basically self explanatory and these comments could get out
of sync.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection, `yarn build` and `yarn test`

**issue:**
#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2017
**what is the change?:**
Changed a test to look for the warning we added in https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/8356/files

**why make this change?:**
To update our tests for new behavior.

**test plan:**
`npm run test`

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2017
* Downgrade deprecation warnings from errors to warnings (facebook#9650)

* Downgrade deprecation warnings from errors to warnings

**what is the change?:**
Swapping out `warning` module for a fork that uses `console.warn`.
It looks like we were using the `warning` module for deprecation notices, *but* there is also a 'deprecated' module designed specifically for deprecation notices.

However, we could not find any place that it was currently used.

Since React's build process is not 100% clear to me, I assume it could still be used somewhere by something and just updated it along with other deprecation notices.

We might consider a follow-up diff that does some clean up here;
 - remove 'deprecated' module if it's unused, OR
 - use 'deprecated' module for all our current deprecation warnings

**why make this change?:**
- We have had complaints about noisy warnings, in particular after introducing new deprecations
- They potentially cause CI failures
- Deprecations are not really time-sensitive, can ship without breaking your app, etc.

For more context - facebook#9395

**test plan:**
`npm run test`
and unit tests for the new modules
and manual testing (WIP)

**issue:**
facebook#9395

* Add 'lowPriorityWarning' to ReactExternals

**what is the change?:**
We won't bundle 'lowPriorityWarning' with the rest of React when building for Facebook.
NOTE: A parallel commit will introduce an internal implementation of 'lowPriorityWarning' in Facebook's codebase, to compensate. Will post a comment with the diff number once that is up.

**why make this change?:**
So that the sync between github and Facebook can go more smoothly!

**test plan:**
We will see when I run the sync! But this is a reasonable first step imo.

**issue:**
facebook#9398

* Tweaks to get tests passing after cherry-picking PR#9650

**what is the change?:**
- adds 'lowPriorityWarning' for deprecation of '__spread' and 'createMixin'
- tweaks test to check for 'warn' and not 'error'

**why make this change?:**
Both these issues were introduced by merge conflict resolution when cherry-picking this change from master onto 15.6.

**test plan:**
`yarn test`

**issue:**

* Fix mis-written 'require' for 'warning' module

**what is the change?:**
Fixes 'warning' to be required from 'warning'

**why make this change?:**
It was causing the browserify build to crash, because we don't expect to have a path to 'warning'.

**test plan:**
CI
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2017
* Improve deprecation warnings by more info and links

**what is the change?:**
Updates the warnings for -
 - `React.createMixin` (was never implemented!)
 - `React.PropTypes`
 - `React.createClass`
 - `React.DOM.*`

We never added the warning for `React.createClass` to the 15.5 line, so
a follow-up PR will add that, with a link to docs etc.

Does *not* update the older warnings for -
 - Factory.type
 - 'isMounted' and 'replaceState'
 - ReactPerf

We could do a second pass if we want to improve those three warnings, but for now I don't think they are as hi-pri.

Still TODO:
 - Do an initial release of the [`react-addons-dom-factories`](https://github.com/facebook/react/tree/master/packages/react-dom-factories#react-addons-dom-factories) package on npm, making it 1.0.
 - Improve the docs for `react-addons-dom-factories` adding documentation and mention the [codemod](https://github.com/reactjs/react-codemod/blob/master/transforms/React-DOM-to-react-dom-factories.js)

**why make this change?:**
 - We want to make updating as easy as possible. Warning messages should increase clarity, and in the past they have caused confusion.

**test plan:**
`yarn test` and running these messages past some folks who use React.

**issue:**
facebook#9398

* Rephrase deprecation messages for clarity

**what is the change?:**
We rephrased the deprecation messages to clarify that
 - these APIs are currently deprecated
 - they will be removed in React v16.0

The previous wording implied that they would be deprecated in v16.0.

**why make this change?:**
To make the messages easier to understand.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2017
* react-create-class -> create-react-class

* Fix issues/bugs introduced by merge conflict resolution

**what is the change?:**
A couple of bugs and holes were introduced when cherry-picking facebook#9232 onto the 15.6 branch. This fixes them.
We also needed to add some logic from facebook#9399

**why make this change?:**
To keep tests passing and get this change working.

**test plan:**
`yarn test`

**issue:**
facebook#9398

* Move component base classes into a single file (facebook#8918)

* More fixes for issues introduced by rebasing

**what is the change?:**
- Remove some outdated 'require' statements that got orphaned in 'React.js'
- Change 'warning' to 'lowPriorityWarning' for 'React.createClass'
- Fix syntax issues in 'React-test'
- Use 'creatReactClass' instead of ES6 class in ReactART
- Update 'prop-type' dependency to use no higher than 15.7 because 15.8 limits the number of warnings, and this causes a test to fail.
- Fix some mixed-up and misnamed variables in `React.js`
- Rebase onto commit that updates deprecation messages
- Update a test based on new deprecation messages

**why make this change?:**
These were bugs introduced by rebasing and tests caught the regressions.

**test plan:**
`yarn test`

**issue:**
facebook#9398

* Reset `yarn.lock`

**what is the change?:**
I didn't mean to commit changes to `yarn.lock` except for the `prop-types` and `create-react-class` updates.

**why make this change?:**
To minimize the changes we make to dependency versions.

**test plan:**
`rm -rf node_modules`
`yarn install`
`yarn run build`
`yarn test`

* Run `yarn prettier`
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2017
**what is the change?:**
`grep -r "react-addons-dom-factories" ./src` and the same in `./packages`
then `%s /react-addons-dom-factories/react-dom-factories/gc`

**why make this change?:**
React dom factories were never part of the 'addons' and we want to minimize the
whole 'addons' thing, since we are deprecating the `React.addons.*` API.

**test plan:**
`yarn test`
and manually look at the README that was updated.

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2017
* Improve warning for `React.createClass`

**what is the change?:**
- Explain that this will be removed in v16.0 specifically
- Mention the version number for the drop-in replacement module.
- Link to docs in the blog post about how to migrate

**why make this change?:**
We want to make our deprecation warnings more clear and helpful.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection and `yarn test`

**issue:**
facebook#9398

* Widen range of recommended replacement module versions

**what is the change?:**
Instead of recommending specific versions of 'prop-types' and
'create-react-class' we ask folks to use the latest available 15.* version.

**why make this change?:**
The latest version of those plugins, within the 15 version, is the most likely
to be stable. For example, we know that 'react-create-class' is broken for AMD
builds at the current latest version, so once we release a fix then the
recommended version will change.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection
Also fixed some tests.

* Fix typos and things

**what is the change?:**
- `migrade` -> `migrate`
- `15.* prop-types package` -> `v15.* prop-types package`

**why make this change?:**
Correctness

**test plan:**
`yarn test` and visual inspection
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2017
* Prepare `react-dom-factories` for publishing

**what is the change?:**
- copies the `React.DOM.*` factory helpers into the package and wraps
  them with an IIFE
- set peerDependency on React to latest 15 version

**why make this change?:**
We are deprecating `React.DOM.*` and this provides a fallback option for
those using it.

We just copied the code in order to avoid a circular dependency, which
keeps complexity down since we are supporting every possible build
system.

**test plan:**
TODO -
1. Copy this into one of our fixtures using a UMD/AMD build and see if
   it works there.
2. Do an initial publish of the package on npm and then pull it into
   CRA, and try it there.
3. Try it in https://github.com/duncanbeevers/jade-react or some other
   project that actually uses the `React.DOM.*` helpers, using the
   related codemod.

**issue:**
facebook#9398

* Fix lints and capitalization of 'reactDOMFactories'

**what is the change?:**
Fixing nits in capitalization, quotes, and defined globals

**why make this change?:**
To get CI passing, consistency, correctness

**test plan:**
see prev. commit

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2017
* Hello 15.6 Release Candidate

**what is the change?:**
We update the versions of all associated React packages when bumping the
version of React.

**why make this change?:**
We want to publish a RC to give folks time to try out the latest version
before it's final.

Why bump the version of every other associated package?

It makes the dependency between them more clear.

There will be cases where we make a fix in React-DOM and it requires
changes in React core. In that case, it will be more clear to people
when we update the versions of both and they remain in sync.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
facebook#9398

* Update a couple more packages versions

**what is the change?:**
Updates version for 'react-dom-factories' package and 'react-addons'
template.

**why make this change?:**
We missed these in the previous commit, which was copying the approach
from https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/9828/files

**test plan:**
Visual inspection, and running the build

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2017
**what is the change?:**
`git checkout master -- CHANGELOG.md`
Then made the 15.6 release no longer wrapped in 'details' tag.

**why make this change?:**
We are releasing 15.6 :D

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2017
**what is the change?:**
A short and sweet summary of 15.6.0 changes

**why make this change?:**
To thank community contributors and call out important changes.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection.
I also looked it over in a markdown viewer - http://dillinger.io/

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2017
**what is the change?:**
Added the 'Installation' section we have on most release blog posts,
customized for the 15.6.0 version of React.
Added the 'Changelog' from master to the blog post.

**why make this change?:**
To show folks how to install React and what changes are in this release.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2017
**what is the change?:**
- Add self to contributors so my name turns into a link
- Use backticks for code-ish things
- Second header to ##, not #
- Change production mode link to the new address per @bvaughn's comment
- Update changelog with fixes from facebook#9951

**why make this change?:**
Make things more clear and accurate.

**test plan:**
Visual inspect - @flarnie will paste an image of how it appears in the
actual docs.

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit to flarnie/react that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2017
**what is the change?:**
- Reword heading about deprecation warning changes
- add 'br' s to the list of installation options
- add some stray missing backticks

**why make this change?:**
Clarity and readability

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
facebook#9398
flarnie added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2017
* Blog post for 15.6.0

**what is the change?:**
A short and sweet summary of 15.6.0 changes

**why make this change?:**
To thank community contributors and call out important changes.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection.
I also looked it over in a markdown viewer - http://dillinger.io/

**issue:**
#9398

* Add 'Installation' and 'Changelog' to 15.6.0 blog post

**what is the change?:**
Added the 'Installation' section we have on most release blog posts,
customized for the 15.6.0 version of React.
Added the 'Changelog' from master to the blog post.

**why make this change?:**
To show folks how to install React and what changes are in this release.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
#9398

* Improvements to blog post, and add self to `authors.yml`

**what is the change?:**
- Add self to contributors so my name turns into a link
- Use backticks for code-ish things
- Second header to ##, not #
- Change production mode link to the new address per @bvaughn's comment
- Update changelog with fixes from #9951

**why make this change?:**
Make things more clear and accurate.

**test plan:**
Visual inspect - @flarnie will paste an image of how it appears in the
actual docs.

**issue:**
#9398

* Further improvements to 15.6 blog post

**what is the change?:**
- Reword heading about deprecation warning changes
- add 'br' s to the list of installation options
- add some stray missing backticks

**why make this change?:**
Clarity and readability

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
#9398
flarnie added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2017
* Blog post for 15.6.0

**what is the change?:**
A short and sweet summary of 15.6.0 changes

**why make this change?:**
To thank community contributors and call out important changes.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection.
I also looked it over in a markdown viewer - http://dillinger.io/

**issue:**
#9398

* Add 'Installation' and 'Changelog' to 15.6.0 blog post

**what is the change?:**
Added the 'Installation' section we have on most release blog posts,
customized for the 15.6.0 version of React.
Added the 'Changelog' from master to the blog post.

**why make this change?:**
To show folks how to install React and what changes are in this release.

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
#9398

* Improvements to blog post, and add self to `authors.yml`

**what is the change?:**
- Add self to contributors so my name turns into a link
- Use backticks for code-ish things
- Second header to ##, not #
- Change production mode link to the new address per @bvaughn's comment
- Update changelog with fixes from #9951

**why make this change?:**
Make things more clear and accurate.

**test plan:**
Visual inspect - @flarnie will paste an image of how it appears in the
actual docs.

**issue:**
#9398

* Further improvements to 15.6 blog post

**what is the change?:**
- Reword heading about deprecation warning changes
- add 'br' s to the list of installation options
- add some stray missing backticks

**why make this change?:**
Clarity and readability

**test plan:**
Visual inspection

**issue:**
#9398
@flarnie
Copy link
Contributor Author

flarnie commented Jun 27, 2017

Closing this now - if any work remains around changes from v15.6.* we should open new issues for that.
🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸
Thanks @gaearon @nhunzaker @bvaughn @aweary @acdlite and everyone who helped out with this process.
🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸⚡🎆🎸
Onward towards 16.0!~~~~ 😁

@flarnie flarnie closed this as completed Jun 27, 2017
@bvaughn bvaughn mentioned this issue Aug 1, 2017
toptaldev92 pushed a commit to toptaldev92/react-codemod that referenced this issue Jul 28, 2021
Since we are deprecating the 'React.DOM.*' factories,[1] we want to
provide a codemod so that it's easier for folks to upgrade their code.

This will include an option to use 'React.createFactory' instead of
'React.createElement' in case there is a use case where that is
preferred.

There is one use of `React.DOM.*` that I have seen which is not covered
here - sometimes it has mistakenly been used for Flow typing. In the
cases I have found it is not proper syntax and doesn't seem like
something we should cover with this codemod.

[1]: facebook/react#9398
and facebook/react#8356
superbuddyy pushed a commit to superbuddyy/react-codemod that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2022
Since we are deprecating the 'React.DOM.*' factories,[1] we want to
provide a codemod so that it's easier for folks to upgrade their code.

This will include an option to use 'React.createFactory' instead of
'React.createElement' in case there is a use case where that is
preferred.

There is one use of `React.DOM.*` that I have seen which is not covered
here - sometimes it has mistakenly been used for Flow typing. In the
cases I have found it is not proper syntax and doesn't seem like
something we should cover with this codemod.

[1]: facebook/react#9398
and facebook/react#8356
cookieranger pushed a commit to cookieranger/react-codemod that referenced this issue Jan 16, 2023
Since we are deprecating the 'React.DOM.*' factories,[1] we want to
provide a codemod so that it's easier for folks to upgrade their code.

This will include an option to use 'React.createFactory' instead of
'React.createElement' in case there is a use case where that is
preferred.

There is one use of `React.DOM.*` that I have seen which is not covered
here - sometimes it has mistakenly been used for Flow typing. In the
cases I have found it is not proper syntax and doesn't seem like
something we should cover with this codemod.

[1]: facebook/react#9398
and facebook/react#8356
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants