docs: add missing override options for Jest config

[tobiasbueschel]

Hi 👋

I've noticed that the documentation for overriding CRA's default Jest configuration has gone out of sync with the actual implementation:

create-react-app/packages/react-scripts/scripts/utils/createJestConfig.js

Lines 75 to 94 in 5e703a5

	const supportedKeys = [
	'clearMocks',
	'collectCoverageFrom',
	'coveragePathIgnorePatterns',
	'coverageReporters',
	'coverageThreshold',
	'displayName',
	'extraGlobals',
	'globalSetup',
	'globalTeardown',
	'moduleNameMapper',
	'resetMocks',
	'resetModules',
	'restoreMocks',
	'snapshotSerializers',
	'testMatch',
	'transform',
	'transformIgnorePatterns',
	'watchPathIgnorePatterns',
	];

This PR fixes that!

[tobiasbueschel]

We no longer only allow coverage overrides, hence, I've also updated the wording here!

On a similar note, I've noticed that a few people would like an option to easily ignore certain files when running tests as mentioned in this StackOverflow post.

@iansu @amyrlam what do you think about including testPathIgnorePatterns in the override options? Happy to raise a PR for it.

[tobiasbueschel]

@ianschmitz @iansu @mrmckeb please let me know if you have any feedback on this PR, otherwise it is ready to be merged 😊 thanks

[mrmckeb]

Looks good to me, let's get a second review and this should be good to go. Thanks @tobiasbueschel!

[tobiasbueschel]

Looks good to me, let's get a second review and this should be good to go. Thanks @tobiasbueschel!

Thanks again for your reviews @mrmckeb! By the way, what do you think about the following?

including testPathIgnorePatterns in the override options?

I suppose that we want to keep any changes at a minimum for the time until v4 is ready? However, if this override is something you would generally be fine with, I can raise a PR for post v4.

[mrmckeb]

@ianschmitz or @iansu, it would be great to get a quick second review here.

[tobiasbueschel]

On a similar note, I've noticed that a few people would like an option to easily ignore certain files when running tests as mentioned in this StackOverflow post.
@iansu @amyrlam what do you think about including testPathIgnorePatterns in the override options? Happy to raise a PR for it.
#9473 (comment)

Hi @ianschmitz & @iansu, hope you are both well :)

Do you have any thoughts on the above idea & this PR?

Cheers

[iansu]

Thanks!