Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update explainer.mdx #907

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024
Merged

Update explainer.mdx #907

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

zainbacchus
Copy link
Contributor

Change native interop to Superchain interop

Change `native interop` to `Superchain interop`
@zainbacchus zainbacchus requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2024 15:49
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on renaming "Native OP Stack interoperability" to "Superchain interop" throughout the documentation. This update ensures consistent terminology while retaining the original functionality related to message passing and asset transfer across chains. The modifications also include updates to sections discussing secure message passing and low latency, aligning explanations with the new term to enhance clarity regarding interoperability within the Superchain framework.

Changes

Files Change Summary
pages/stack/protocol/interop/explainer.mdx Renamed "Native OP Stack interoperability" to "Superchain interop"; updated sections on secure message passing and low latency to reflect the new terminology.

Possibly related PRs

  • interop explainers #825: Introduces a new explainer for interoperability within the OP Stack, aligning with the focus on terminology changes.
  • Two broken links #874: Updates links in the explainer.mdx file, which is directly related to the documentation changes in the main PR.
  • superchain-bridges #695: Involves renaming references from "Optimism Bridge UI" to "Superchain Bridges UI," connecting to the broader terminology changes in the main PR.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • (No reviewers suggested)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 26d4822
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/66eaf6987bd3d4000867cd10
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-907--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/explainer.mdx (1)

Line range hint 1-88: Suggestions for additional improvements:

  1. Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like "We" and "Our" to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  2. Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences. For example, "Superchain" should be capitalized throughout the document.
  3. Apply the Oxford comma for clarity and consistency.
Tools
LanguageTool

[style] ~34-~34: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...ually. The fault proof guarantees that all of the cross-chain messages are accounted for ...

(ALL_OF_THE)

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between db75b7e and 26d4822.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/protocol/interop/explainer.mdx (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/explainer.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Use bold for prominence instead of all caps or italics.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for headers, buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
    "
LanguageTool
pages/stack/protocol/interop/explainer.mdx

[style] ~81-~81: For conciseness, try rephrasing this sentence.
Context: ...e chains that have different features - it could be that they use Plasma for data availability, a custom ...

(MAY_MIGHT_BE)

Additional comments not posted (3)
pages/stack/protocol/interop/explainer.mdx (3)

24-24: LGTM!

The terminology update from "Native OP Stack interoperability" to "Superchain interop" is consistent throughout the document and improves clarity.


32-32: LGTM!

The terminology update from "Native OP Stack interoperability" to "Superchain interop" is consistent throughout the document and improves clarity.


81-81: LGTM!

The rephrased sentence is clearer and more concise. It addresses the valid suggestion from the static analysis tool.

Tools
LanguageTool

[style] ~81-~81: For conciseness, try rephrasing this sentence.
Context: ...e chains that have different features - it could be that they use Plasma for data availability, a custom ...

(MAY_MIGHT_BE)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants