Update explainer.mdx

Change `native interop` to `Superchain interop`

pages/stack/protocol/interop/explainer.mdx

@@ -21,15 +21,15 @@ Native OP Stack interoperability provides the ability to read messages and trans
 *   improved user experience for developers on the Superchain
 
 ## Secure Message Passing
-Native interop includes both the protocol layer message passing and the Superchain ERC20 token specification.
+Superchain interop includes both the protocol layer message passing and the Superchain ERC20 token specification.
 
 *   **Message passing protocol:** the initial + finalizing/executing [message](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/messaging.html) that fire events to be consumed by the chains in the [dependency set](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/dependency-set.html)
 *   **SupERC20 token specification**: the [SuperchainERC20](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/token-bridging.html) turns message passing into asset transfer between chains in the interop set
 
 This means ETH and ERC-20s can seamlessly and securely move across L2s, and intent-based protocols (i.e., bridges) can build better experiences on top of the message passing protocol.
 
 ## Low Latency
-Interoperability allows for horizontally scalable blockchains, a key feature of the Superchain. With native interop, latency can be low (~2 seconds) by optimistically accepting cross-chain messages. 
+Interoperability allows for horizontally scalable blockchains, a key feature of the Superchain. With Superchain interop, latency can be low (~2 seconds) by optimistically accepting cross-chain messages. 
 The fork choice rule enforces eventual consistency, meaning that if an invalid cross-chain message is accepted, it will be reorganized out eventually. 
 The fault proof guarantees that all of the cross-chain messages are accounted for from the perspective of handling withdrawals through the bridge to L1.
 
@@ -78,6 +78,6 @@ The protocol enforces the fact that all executing messages are valid. It does th
 Sequencers only have to trust each other, if they are accepting executing messages where the initiating message is unsafe. This is because the sequencer's ability to equivocate on unsafe data, i.e., batch submit something different from what they gossip over the p2p network. Once data is submitted to L1, it is considered final relative to the L2 and therefore there is no longer an equivocation risk.
 
 ### Is interop different between chains with non-fungible blockspace?
-Chains that have non-fungible blockspace are chains that have different features - it could be that they use Plasma for data availability, a custom gas paying token or have a large execution gas limit. As long as the chain can be fault proven, it can work with native interoperability. At the application layer, it is important for chains to have legibility into the type of chain that the message originated from. This ensures that applications do not accept messages from chains they consider not secure enough. See this [discussion](https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/specs/issues/121) for additional thoughts.
+Chains that have non-fungible blockspace are chains that have different features - it could be that they use Plasma for data availability, a custom gas paying token or have a large execution gas limit. As long as the chain can be fault proven, it can work with Superchain interoperability. At the application layer, it is important for chains to have legibility into the type of chain that the message originated from. This ensures that applications do not accept messages from chains they consider not secure enough. See this [discussion](https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/specs/issues/121) for additional thoughts.
 
 When it comes to chains that have different gas limits that are interoperable, it creates a set of transactions that can execute on one chain but not the other. This happens when the transaction consumes more than the gas limit of the smaller chain but less than of the bigger chain. At 2024 usages levels, these sorts of transactions are very rare. In the future, it may be the case that these transactions become more common, it will be up to the chain operators to ensure quality of service for their users.