-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Two broken links #874
Two broken links #874
Conversation
Was using page, wanted to see non-technical explainer, but link is broken. Believe this corresponds although it's not really an 'explainer' as such, so maybe something else works?
WalkthroughThe changes involve updating hyperlinks in the documentation for the OP Stack and Superchain. Specifically, the links to introductory resources and the Cannon proof system have been modified to ensure users access the most relevant and accurate information. These adjustments do not alter the content's functionality or logic. Changes
Possibly related issues
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Description
Just fixing two broken links.
Was using page, wanted to see non-technical explainer, but link is broken. Believe the first corresponds to original intention although it's not really an 'explainer' as such, so maybe something else works?
Tests
No tests, in-place link substitution.
Additional context
No add'l context.
Metadata