Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG - Fix broken link in Rollup Jobs (#58802) #58929

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 3, 2020
Merged

BUG - Fix broken link in Rollup Jobs (#58802) #58929

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 3, 2020

Conversation

justinjunodev
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

When creating a new rollup job, I noticed that the the Schedule section contained a broken link for getting more information on CRON expressions. More details for this issue can be found [here],(#58802) along with suggestions from team members that I followed to the make appropriate changes.

For maintainers

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Since this is a community submitted pull request, a Jenkins build has not been kicked off automatically. Can an Elastic organization member please verify the contents of this patch and then kick off a build manually?

@TinaHeiligers TinaHeiligers added release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Feature:Rollups v7.7.0 labels Feb 28, 2020
@TinaHeiligers TinaHeiligers requested a review from lcawl February 28, 2020 19:25
@timroes timroes added the Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more label Feb 28, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/es-ui (Team:Elasticsearch UI)

Copy link
Contributor

@alisonelizabeth alisonelizabeth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@justinjunodev thanks for the contribution. Great work! I left one comment if you could address before merging. Thanks!

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ let xPackBase = '';

export function setEsBaseAndXPackBase(elasticWebsiteUrl, docLinksVersion) {
esBase = `${elasticWebsiteUrl}guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/${docLinksVersion}`;
xPackBase = `${elasticWebsiteUrl}guide/en/x-pack/${docLinksVersion}`;
xPackBase = `${elasticWebsiteUrl}guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/${docLinksVersion}`;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than changing the value of xPackBase, can you use esBase on L11 and delete the xpackBase variable if it's no longer being used?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure can. I also saw this and was curious if that was the correct/better approach here. Nonetheless, I just pushed an updated branch with the requested changes. Happy Monday.

@alisonelizabeth
Copy link
Contributor

@elasticmachine merge upstream

@alisonelizabeth
Copy link
Contributor

jenkins test this

@alisonelizabeth
Copy link
Contributor

jenkins test this

Copy link
Contributor

@alisonelizabeth alisonelizabeth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great! Tested locally. Thanks for addressing my feedback @justinjunodev. I pushed a commit to your branch to fix a minor lint error. Once the build is green, I will go ahead and merge and backport the PR. Nice work!

@justinjunodev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @alisonelizabeth! Thanks for letting me contribute again. 🥳🥳🥳

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature:Rollups release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Kibana Management Dev Tools, Index Management, Upgrade Assistant, ILM, Ingest Node Pipelines, and more v7.7.0 v8.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants