Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: configure workspace security context for container builds #1549

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

AObuchow
Copy link
Contributor

@AObuchow AObuchow commented Oct 27, 2022

What does this PR do?

Configures the workspace.containerSecurityContext field of the Che-Operator-owned DWOC depending on the value of devEnvironments.disableContainerBuildCapabilities in the Che Cluster CR.

If devEnvironments.disableContainerBuildCapabilities is set to false, then the DWOC's workspace.containerSecurityContext is configured as follows:

containerSecurityContext:
  allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
  capabilities:
    add:
    - SETGID
    - SETUID

If devEnvironments.disableContainerBuildCapabilities is set to true, then the DWOC's workspace.containerSecurityContext field is cleared.

Screenshot/screencast of this PR

n/a

What issues does this PR fix or reference?

eclipse-che/che#21770

How to test this PR?

Some extra automated tests were added for this PR.

In terms of manual testing, there are 2 relevant cases (the first one concerns the core functionality this PR adds, and the second one ensures that the appropriate SCC is used when testing Che on OpenShift):

Ensuring the Che-Operator-owned DWOC is correctly configured (Minikube)

  1. Deploy an image of DevWorkspace-Operator that has the changes from this PR to your cluster. I have an image hosted at: quay.io/aobuchow/dwo-container-security-context.
# In the DevWorkspace-Operator repo:
export DWO_IMG=quay.io/aobuchow/dwo-container-security-context

minikube addons enable ingress && make install_cert_manager && make install
  1. Build an image of Che-Operator using the changes from this PR. There is already one hosted at quay.io/aobuchow/che-operator:next
  2. Deploy Che-Operator using the image from step 1: chectl server:deploy --installer operator -p minikube --che-operator-image=quay.io/aobuchow/che-operator:next
  3. Ensure the Che-Operator-owned DWOC does not have the workspace.containerSecurityContext field by default.
    oc describe dwoc -n eclipse-che
apiVersion: controller.devfile.io/v1alpha1  
config:  
 workspace:  
kind: DevWorkspaceOperatorConfig  
metadata:  
 creationTimestamp: "2022-10-26T20:09:23Z"  
 generation: 2  
 name: devworkspace-config  
 namespace: eclipse-che  
(...)
  1. Set devEnvironments.disableContainerBuildCapabilities to true the Che Cluster CR:
  2. Ensure the Che-Operator-owned DWOC now has the workspace.containerSecurityContext field configured with the correct container security context:
    oc describe dwoc -n eclipse-che
 apiVersion: controller.devfile.io/v1alpha1  
 config:  
  workspace:  
+    containerSecurityContext:  
+      allowPrivilegeEscalation: false  
+      capabilities:  
+        add:  
+        - SETGID  
+        - SETUID  
 kind: DevWorkspaceOperatorConfig  
 metadata:  
  creationTimestamp: "2022-10-26T20:09:23Z"  
  generation: 2  
  name: devworkspace-config  
  namespace: eclipse-che  
(...)
  1. Set devEnvironments.disableContainerBuildCapabilities to false the Che Cluster CR.
  2. Ensure that the workspace.containerSecurityContext field has been cleared from the Che-Operator-owned DWOC:
    oc describe dwoc -n eclipse-che
apiVersion: controller.devfile.io/v1alpha1  
config:  
 workspace:  
kind: DevWorkspaceOperatorConfig  
metadata:  
 creationTimestamp: "2022-10-26T20:09:23Z"  
 generation: 2  
 name: devworkspace-config  
 namespace: eclipse-che  
(...)

Ensuring containers can be built on OpenShift with an SCC present that has higher priority than container-build

  1. Install a version of DWO (with the changes from this PR) using OLM. The easiest way to do this is to oc apply -f apply the following catalogsource and then install DWO from OperatorHub:
apiVersion: operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: CatalogSource
metadata:
  name: devworkspace-operator-catalog
  namespace: openshift-marketplace
spec:
  sourceType: grpc
  image: quay.io/aobuchow/devworkspace-operator-index:next
  publisher: Red Hat
  displayName: DevWorkspace Operator Catalog
  updateStrategy:
    registryPoll:
      interval: 5m
  1. Deploy Che using the operator image built from the current PR:
    chectl server:deploy -p openshift --che-operator-image=quay.io/aobuchow/che-operator:next
  2. Set devEnvironments.disableContainerBuildCapabilities to false the Che Cluster CR.
  3. Follow the SCC related instructions from this PR though do not create the workspace that uses the controller.devfile.io/scc attribute yet. Note: For Step 3. Let the user creating the DevWorkspace use the container-build SCC requires you to have a user other than kube:admin on your cluster. I personally create other users with HTPasswd
  4. Apply a higher priority SCC to the cluster
  5. As a user that has access to the container-build SCC (other than kube:admin), create a workspace that uses the controller.devfile.io/scc attribute (Step 4 from the SCC PR)
  6. Check the workspace deployment and ensure the openshift.io/scc: container-build annotation is set.

PR Checklist

As the author of this Pull Request I made sure that:

Reviewers

Reviewers, please comment how you tested the PR when approving it.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 27, 2022

Hi @AObuchow. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a eclipse-che member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@AObuchow AObuchow changed the title feat: configure workspace security context for container builds WIP: feat: configure workspace security context for container builds Oct 27, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 27, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1549 (70eeb4e) into main (21b652e) will increase coverage by 1.53%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1549      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.02%   60.56%   +1.53%     
==========================================
  Files          74       73       -1     
  Lines        6418     6306     -112     
==========================================
+ Hits         3788     3819      +31     
+ Misses       2261     2147     -114     
+ Partials      369      340      -29     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...eploy/dev-workspace-config/dev_workspace_config.go 90.74% <100.00%> (+0.54%) ⬆️
api/v2/checluster_types.go 30.43% <0.00%> (-1.39%) ⬇️
api/v2/checluster_webhook.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
api/v2/zz_generated.deepcopy.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
controllers/che/checluster_controller.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/deploy/pluginregistry/openvsxurl_reconciler.go
controllers/usernamespace/namespacecache.go 81.35% <0.00%> (+1.72%) ⬆️
pkg/common/operator-defaults/defaults.go 20.61% <0.00%> (+3.30%) ⬆️
pkg/deploy/clusterrolebinding.go 86.84% <0.00%> (+4.34%) ⬆️
pkg/deploy/sync.go 68.25% <0.00%> (+4.61%) ⬆️
... and 3 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@AObuchow AObuchow changed the title WIP: feat: configure workspace security context for container builds feat: configure workspace security context for container builds Nov 8, 2022
@AObuchow AObuchow marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2022 23:30
Signed-off-by: Andrew Obuchowicz <[email protected]>
pkg/common/utils/utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/deploy/dev-workspace-config/dev_workspace_config.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/common/constants/constants.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/deploy/dev-workspace-config/dev_workspace_config.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@AObuchow AObuchow requested review from tolusha and removed request for nickboldt, AndrienkoAleksandr and flacatus November 9, 2022 16:42
@AObuchow
Copy link
Contributor Author

AObuchow commented Nov 9, 2022

@tolusha Sorry about that, will fix failing tests

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 10, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AObuchow, tolusha

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 10, 2022

@AObuchow: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/v11-devworkspace-happy-path 825d048 link true /test v11-devworkspace-happy-path

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

@AObuchow: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ibuziuk ibuziuk mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2022
82 tasks
@tolusha
Copy link
Contributor

tolusha commented Dec 28, 2022

closed in favor of #1576

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants