Skip to content

Issues: decentralized-identity/trustdidweb

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

24 Open 48 Closed
24 Open 48 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Should we add the requirement that the DIDDoc be processed in a DIDDoc Linter in the spec?
#145 opened Nov 30, 2024 by swcurran
1
Adjust the did-witness.json file to minimize the number of proofs
#144 opened Nov 29, 2024 by swcurran
Does it make sense to only keep the proofs about the two most recent log update entries?
#143 opened Nov 29, 2024 by swcurran
2
Is it sufficient for a witness to sign only the versionId of the entry?
#142 opened Nov 29, 2024 by swcurran
1
Is the spec clear on how a valid witness proof applies to earlier versions?
#141 opened Nov 29, 2024 by swcurran
Should we allow disabling a witness
#140 opened Nov 29, 2024 by swcurran
4 tasks
2
Should we require allowing CORS?
#138 opened Nov 28, 2024 by brianorwhatever
New approach to recording/publishing Witnesses
#135 opened Nov 22, 2024 by swcurran
@swcurran
2
Should the spec have an opinion on the use of "old keys" and their use for verification
#134 opened Nov 22, 2024 by swcurran
Rename DID Method -- new name did:webvh
#132 opened Nov 22, 2024 by swcurran
2 of 11 tasks
@swcurran
Further clarification on (partial) resolution
#131 opened Nov 14, 2024 by andrewwhitehead
1
OIDC compatibility — Self-Issued OpenID Provider
#128 opened Nov 9, 2024 by erlend-sh
1
final proofPurpose
#125 opened Oct 25, 2024 by brianorwhatever
How to distinguish between witness proofs and controller proofs discuss Let's talk about this at our next meeting
#114 opened Oct 2, 2024 by brianorwhatever
4
Consider how DID Linked Resources might be used in did:tdw
#107 opened Sep 14, 2024 by swcurran
2
Create a did:tdw test suite
#87 opened Aug 2, 2024 by swcurran
Add a section to the specification of how did:tdw can be used with the High Assurance DIDs Specification
#78 opened Jul 19, 2024 by swcurran
2
Add section to specification about not trusting a DID based on verification alone
#73 opened Jul 17, 2024 by swcurran
1
Is there a way/convention for transitioning an existing did:web DID to be a did:tdw DID?
#68 opened Jul 9, 2024 by swcurran
2
Extract SCID section to a standalone spec?
#54 opened May 5, 2024 by dmitrizagidulin
4
Implementor Guidance: Publishing AnonCreds objects using did:tdw
#51 opened Apr 29, 2024 by swcurran
@andrewwhitehead
1
Proper content-type for .jsonl discuss Let's talk about this at our next meeting
#44 opened Apr 12, 2024 by brianorwhatever
8
Additional resolver metadata discuss Let's talk about this at our next meeting
#43 opened Apr 11, 2024 by andrewwhitehead
1
List of resolver verification errors and error codes discuss Let's talk about this at our next meeting
#23 opened Mar 29, 2024 by swcurran
2
ProTip! Adding no:label will show everything without a label.