Add factory wrappers to renamed_relations

[VersusFacit]

resolves #9681

Problem

(Lt. Montgomery Scott voice) Captain, they be missing their wrappers. I can't hold 'em together for much longer.

We need the field wrappers to allow these to be overridden correctly in the runtime.

Solution

Wrap them, so that they are in compliance with other such members of the dataclass.

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
• I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
• This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR (they are in linked adapter PRs)
• This PR has no interface changes (e.g. macros, cli, logs, json artifacts, config files, adapter interface, etc) or this PR has already received feedback and approval from Product or DX
• This PR includes type annotations for new and modified functions

[github-actions]

Thank you for your pull request! We could not find a changelog entry for this change. For details on how to document a change, see the contributing guide.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.35%. Comparing base (a0372fc) to head (bf52e55).

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           1.7.latest    #9682      +/-   ##
==============================================
- Coverage       86.62%   85.35%   -1.28%     
==============================================
  Files             179      179              
  Lines           26671    26671              
==============================================
- Hits            23105    22764     -341     
- Misses           3566     3907     +341     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	81.99% <100.00%> (-1.48%)	⬇️
unit	64.90% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[VersusFacit]

@cla-bot check

[cla-bot]

The cla-bot has been summoned, and re-checked this pull request!

[mikealfare]

lol, the codecov check failed because we merged 1.7.latest into this branch, which triggered the check to look at all files, and somehow that was less than 1.7.latest. Magical.