Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[GSoC'24] Test Cases for Consensus Features #8283

Open
wants to merge 75 commits into
base: gsoc/consensus-feature
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Viditagarwal7479
Copy link
Contributor

#7973

Adding test cases for consensus features

Checklist

- [ ] I submit my changes into the develop branch
- [ ] I have created a changelog fragment
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly

License

  • I submit my code changes under the same MIT License that covers the project.
    Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 8, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Viditagarwal7479 Viditagarwal7479 marked this pull request as draft August 8, 2024 21:37
@Viditagarwal7479 Viditagarwal7479 changed the title Test Cases for Consensus Features [GSoC'24] Test Cases for Consensus Features Sep 5, 2024
@Viditagarwal7479 Viditagarwal7479 marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2024 23:57
@zhiltsov-max
Copy link
Contributor

zhiltsov-max commented Sep 9, 2024

I've merged the consensus implementation branch, please fix the CI errors from that branch here, namely the error in rego files, and the other comment as well.

SpecLad and others added 29 commits September 20, 2024 15:57
The default `Content-Type` for `HttpResponse` is `text/html`, so an attacker
can create a label a `<script>` tag inside its name, generate a quality
report, and give a direct link to the `/data` endpoint to a victim user,
causing the script to execute with that user's permission.
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change
(https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues).
It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent
contributors.
Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be
approved and merged.
Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/).
-->

<!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above -->

### Motivation and context
<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it
fixes an open
issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail,
add
screenshots. -->
requests page tests:
The is a potential issue in regression test. As we test 2 exports one by
one, there can be 2 pop-up notifications about successful operation. But
our command cy.closeNotification expects only one. So changed logic a
bit in test so it doesnt crush even if there is several notifications

quality_management tests:
sometimes actions button is not clicked

### How has this been tested?
<!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.
Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to
see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->

### Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply.
If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly
strikethrough~~ the whole
line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the
pull request.
If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here
to help! -->
- [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch
- ~~[ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in
CHANGELOG.md -->~~
- ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~
- ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~
- ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs](

https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~
- ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary

([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning),

[cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning),

[cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning)
and

[cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~

### License

- [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License](
https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the
project.
  Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Bug Fixes**
- Improved the method for closing the export completion notification on
the requests page for better reliability.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change
(https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues).
It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent
contributors.
Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be
approved and merged.
Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/).
-->

<!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above -->

### Motivation and context
<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it
fixes an open
issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail,
add
screenshots. -->

- Changed chunk generation from per-task chunks to per-segment chunks
- Fixed a memory leak in video reading on the server side (only in
media_extractors, so there are several more left)
- Fixed a potential hang in `import` worker or the server process on
process shutdown
- Disabled multithreading in video reading in endpoints (not in static
chunk generation)
- Refactored static chunk generation code (moved after job creation)
- Refactored various server internal APIs for frame retrieval
- Updated UI logic to access chunks, added support for non-sequential
frames in chunks
- Added a new server configuration option `CVAT_ALLOW_STATIC_CACHE`
(boolean) to enable and disable static cache support. The option is
disabled by default (it's changed from the previous behavior)
- Added tests for the changes made
- Added missing original chunk type field in job responses
- Fixed invalid kvrocks cleanup in tests for Helm deployment
- Added a new 0-based `index` parameter in `GET
/api/jobs/{id}/data/?type=chunk` to simplify indexing
  - GT job chunks with non-sequential frames have no placeholders inside

When this update is applied to the server, there will be a data storage
setting migration for the tasks. Existing tasks using static chunks
(`task.data.storage_method == FILE_SYSTEM`) will be switched to the
dynamic cache (i.e. to `== CACHE)`). The remaining files should be
removed manually, there will be a list of such tasks in the migration
log file.

After this update, you'll have an option to enable or disable static
cache use during task creation. This allows, in particular, prohibit new
tasks using the static cache. With this option, any tasks using static
cache will use the dynamic cache instead on data access.

User-observable changes:
- Job chunk ids now start from 0 for each job instead of using parent
task ids
- The `use_cache = false` or `storage_method = filesystem` parameters in
task creation can be ignored by the server
- Task chunk access may be slower for some chunks (particularly, for
tasks with overlap configured, for chunks on segment boundaries, and for
tasks previously using static chunks)
- The last chunk in a job will contain only the frames from the current
job, even if there are more frames in the task

### How has this been tested?
<!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.
Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to
see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->

### Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply.
If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly
strikethrough~~ the whole
line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the
pull request.
If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here
to help! -->
- [ ] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch
- [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in
CHANGELOG.md -->
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly
- [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes
- [ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs](

https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))
- [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary

([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning),

[cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning),

[cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning)
and

[cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))

### License

- [ ] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License](
https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the
project.
  Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **New Features**
- Introduced a new server setting to disable media chunks on the local
filesystem.
- Enhanced frame prefetching with a `startFrame` parameter for improved
chunk calculations.
- Added a new property, `data_original_chunk_type`, for enhanced job
differentiation in the metadata.

- **Bug Fixes**
- Resolved memory management issues to prevent leaks during video
processing.
	- Corrected naming inconsistencies related to the `prefetchAnalyzer`.

- **Documentation**
- Included configuration for code formatting tools to ensure consistent
code quality across the project.

- **Refactor**
- Restructured classes and methods for improved clarity and
maintainability, particularly in media handling and task processing.

- **Chores**
- Updated formatting scripts to include additional directories for
automated code formatting.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
* Fix security issue when anyone could obtain project|task|job|membership details

* Check additional permissions when trying to update task/project target/source storage
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change
(https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/issues).
It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent
contributors.
Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be
approved and merged.
Read the [Contribution guide](https://docs.cvat.ai/docs/contributing/).
-->

<!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above -->

### Motivation and context
<!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it
fixes an open
issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail,
add
screenshots. -->
The task details documentaion page is very outdated. It displays old UI
and some icorrect info

### How has this been tested?
<!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes.
Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to
see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->

### Checklist
<!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply.
If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly
strikethrough~~ the whole
line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the
pull request.
If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here
to help! -->
- [ ] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch
- [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in
CHANGELOG.md -->
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly
- [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes
- [ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs](

https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))
- [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary

([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning),

[cvat-core](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning),

[cvat-data](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning)
and

[cvat-ui](https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))

### License

- [ ] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License](
https://github.com/cvat-ai/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the
project.
  Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

- **Documentation**
	- Updated content in the `task-details.md` for improved clarity.
	- Changed image references for better accuracy.
- Clarified terminology regarding job attributes and expanded the
description of the "Assignee."
- Removed outdated references and functionality related to the
"Reviewer" and clipboard copying.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
…ases

# Conflicts:
#	cvat/apps/consensus/serializers.py
#	cvat/apps/consensus/views.py
#	tests/python/shared/assets/annotations.json
#	tests/python/shared/assets/cvat_db/cvat_data.tar.bz2
#	tests/python/shared/assets/cvat_db/data.json
#	tests/python/shared/assets/jobs.json
#	tests/python/shared/assets/labels.json
#	tests/python/shared/assets/quality_settings.json
#	tests/python/shared/assets/tasks.json
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
8.4% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants