Updated task-details documentation
#8468
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe document Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(No sequence diagrams generated due to the nature of changes being content updates rather than functional modifications.) Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
site/content/en/images/image007_detrac.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgsite/content/en/images/image131_detrac.jpgis excluded by!**/*.jpgsite/content/en/images/task-details-1.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsite/content/en/images/task-details-2.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
Files selected for processing (1)
- site/content/en/docs/manual/basics/task-details.md (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
site/content/en/docs/manual/basics/task-details.md (4)
28-28: Approve terminology update for improved clarity.The change from "Frames" to "Frame range" is a good improvement. It provides more precise terminology and aligns well with the description "the frame interval".
34-34: Approve expanded Assignee description and verify Reviewer information.The expanded description of "Assignee" provides more detailed and useful information. The addition of the hyperlink is helpful for users seeking more information about reviewer or corrector roles.
Please confirm that the removal of the separate "Reviewer" mention (as noted in the AI summary) is intentional and doesn't result in loss of important information. Run the following script to check for any remaining references to "Reviewer" in the file:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining "Reviewer" references in the file. # Test: Search for "Reviewer" in the file if rg --ignore-case "reviewer" site/content/en/docs/manual/basics/task-details.md; then echo "Note: 'Reviewer' references found in the file. Please ensure these are intended." else echo "No standalone 'Reviewer' references found in the file." fi
Line range hint
1-45: Overall approval with final verification request.The changes made to this documentation file generally improve its clarity, accuracy, and relevance. The updates to image references, terminology, and role descriptions align well with the PR objectives of updating outdated content and improving documentation quality.
However, to ensure completeness:
- Please confirm that the removal of the "copy to clipboard" functionality (mentioned in the AI summary) is intentional.
- Verify that all new image files exist and accurately represent the current UI.
- Ensure that no critical information was lost with the removal of the separate "Reviewer" mention.
Run this final verification script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Final verification of changes and potential issues. echo "1. Checking for 'copy to clipboard' references:" rg --ignore-case "copy to clipboard" site/content/en/docs/manual/basics/task-details.md echo "\n2. Verifying existence of new image files:" fd -t f "task-details-1.png" "task-details-2.png" static/images echo "\n3. Checking for standalone 'Reviewer' references:" rg --ignore-case "\breview(er)?\b" site/content/en/docs/manual/basics/task-details.md echo "\nPlease review the output and ensure all changes are intentional and complete."
45-45: Approve second image update and verify new image.The second image reference has also been updated to a more descriptive and consistent name, which is good. As with the first image, we should ensure that this new image exists and accurately represents the current user interface.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the second new image:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the second new image file. # Test: Check if the new image file exists if fd -t f "task-details-2.png" static/images; then echo "New image file 'task-details-2.png' found." else echo "Warning: New image file 'task-details-2.png' not found in the static/images directory." fi
|
Motivation and context
The task details documentaion page is very outdated. It displays old UI and some icorrect info
How has this been tested?
Checklist
developbranch(cvat-canvas,
cvat-core,
cvat-data and
cvat-ui)
License
Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
Summary by CodeRabbit
task-details.mdfor improved clarity.