Release v2.11.3 #7715
Merged
Release v2.11.3 #7715
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![cvat-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/406724?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Update develop after v2.11.2
Refactor code to use useReducer instead of useState. Fixes #7428 'file' and 'fileName' in the uploadParams were not set to null after import. To avoid this change the code to set 'file' and 'fileName' to null after importing is done. <!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> This change is required to make the code clear. The previous code uses many `useState` to manage the state but this version uses `useReducer` to manage all the states. In the previous code `file` and `fileName` in the `uploadParams` were not set to null after importing was done but this version set it to null so it can not use the previous file while importing annotation. it solves issue #7428 ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> The changes have been tested manually. The code was tested using different sequences of annotation uploads. The state of each parameter is tested by logging its state to the console. ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [x] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~ - [x] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) - ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary~~ ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. --------- Co-authored-by: Boris Sekachev <[email protected]>
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> The existing code creates a row and column for each category in the dataset, plus an extra row/column at the end for unmatched annotations. However, it's not immediately clear what order these rows/columns are in, because all access is done indirectly through the `confusion_matrix_labels_rmap` dictionary. IMO, this is an unnecessary level of indirection, which obscures the structure of the matrix. It's easier to just assign rows/columns 0..(N-1) to the categories and N to "unmatched". Do just that. Additionally, factor out the code creating the matrix into a function, because it's used in two places. ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> Manual testing. ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - ~~[ ] I have created a changelog fragment~~ <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~ - ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~ - ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~ ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
…ic (#7632) In addition, remove code creating an unused annotation summary object from `generate_report`. <!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> Manual testing. ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - ~~[ ] I have created a changelog fragment~~ <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~ - ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~ - ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~ ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
…ponent in job page) (#7621) ref issue: #7620 I've created a class called `cvat-empty-jobs-list` and added it to a div to make the empty component in the job page aligned in the middle as all other pages having empty component aligned to its center. 
…o create one. (#7623) <!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> Fixes #7622 Added a check to ensure that tests which need to create a gt_job aren't picking up tasks which already have a gt_job ### How has this been tested? I added a new task to the testing database and ran these updated tests. ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch ~- [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md -->~ ~- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~ - [x] I have added tests to cover my changes - [x] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) ~- [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~ ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. --------- Co-authored-by: Maxim Zhiltsov <[email protected]>
### Motivation and context The old python debugger configuration will soon be deprecated so I changed it to use debugpy which is the new configuration. ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. Co-authored-by: syedbarimanjan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Maxim Zhiltsov <[email protected]>
There've been a couple of patches that introduced minor changes to object representations. Recreate the test dump so that these changes don't pollute the diff in future pull requests.
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> The current formula used to calculate `ConfusionMatrix.accuracy` is, in fact, not accuracy, but the Jaccard index. Replace it with the correct formula. Since the Jaccard index is a useful metric in its own right, calculate it too, but save it in another attribute of `ConfusionMatrix`. ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> Manual testing. ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [x] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~ - ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~ - ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~ ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. --------- Co-authored-by: Maxim Zhiltsov <[email protected]>
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> The current formula the UI uses to calculate accuracy is incorrect. The denominator is supposed to be the total sample count, but ds_count + gt_count - valid_count is not the same value. To illustrate: **** ***. *... **** **** ***. .*.. **** **** ***. ..*. **** .... ***. .... ***. ds_count gt_count valid_count total_count (expected) Each value is the sum of the values in the confusion matrix marked by `*`. The current formula essentially adds values that are off the diagonal twice. Instead of trying to derive the total count from other values, just transmit the correct value from the server and use it in the UI. ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> Manual testing. ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [x] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~ - ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~ - ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~ ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [ ] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly - [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes - [ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) - [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. --------- Co-authored-by: Mariia Acoca <[email protected]>
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> 1. Added new Label Validation to handle empty label name given to constructor. 2. Fixed existing validation for Duplicate label name to make it more clear. 3. Added tests for both. <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> #### Background - Mentioned as an`ui-ux` `enhancement` issue in #5729, Two problems were raised: 1. Hint when user tries to add existing label in project is incorrect as the same code validation is triggered in both project and task. 2. When user enters an empty label name, It is not intuitively clear that the state of the constructor is reset and skeleton is not added. #### Fix 1. Tests were written for the desired outcome. 2. Fixed the Unique Label Validation by changing the display message to a generalized one. <img width="1511" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-18 at 1 20 47 AM" src="https://github.com/opencv/cvat/assets/89384052/4d29dee0-2859-4219-bdd4-70eb6f42b36d"> <img width="1511" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-18 at 1 21 03 AM" src="https://github.com/opencv/cvat/assets/89384052/6dcdee8c-015d-4558-be77-9db52ae09906"> 4. Added a new Empty Label Validation which stops the form from submitting when label name is empty and displays an error message. <img width="1511" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-18 at 1 21 20 AM" src="https://github.com/opencv/cvat/assets/89384052/9848dde8-f178-412b-ac6c-24ad42c95576"> ### How has this been tested? - The issue was first triggered locally. - Test cases were written using Cypress, Here are the screenshots of the same. <img width="1511" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-18 at 1 22 29 AM" src="https://github.com/opencv/cvat/assets/89384052/2fdc7c5a-e200-461d-b3cb-6cb2a5f8216c"> <img width="1511" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-18 at 1 23 51 AM" src="https://github.com/opencv/cvat/assets/89384052/1eb9c6d1-81f6-4a5e-88b5-62acdf654b41"> <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [x] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly - [x] I have added tests to cover my changes - [x] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) - [x] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. --------- Co-authored-by: Kirill Lakhov <[email protected]>
This was only used by the Git synchronization functionality, which was removed in #6904.
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> Test for feature #7540 ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly - [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes - [x] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) - [x] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
test case for the pr #7599
…cess (#7551) <!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> Looks like using dependent jobs for downloading resources from cloud storage gives more problems than benefits. With such architecture, it is possible to stop the import queue forever. E.g. RQ_1 process for downloading file from CS fails -> dependent RQ_2 process for importing file will not be started ([1](https://github.dev/rq/rq/blob/3ad86083c33ec28b81a07f94dafdcf1cd56429ea/rq/worker.py#L1562), [2](https://github.dev/rq/rq/blob/3ad86083c33ec28b81a07f94dafdcf1cd56429ea/rq/worker.py#L691-L692)) (it means that this process will be kept in the deferred registry forever since there is no code that cleans the deferred registry + for some reason such jobs are not moved to the failed registry after dependencies fail) -> next request for importing something creates new RQ job dependent from RQ_2. This PR fixes the described issue. ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> Manually ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly - [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes - [ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) ~~- [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~ ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. --------- Co-authored-by: Andrey Zhavoronkov <[email protected]>
…#7604) Added accumulation of confusion matrix across various jobs under the same task. ### Motivation and context Fixes #7424 ### How has this been tested? On the backup task containing 10 jobs [task_task.with.10.jobs_backup_2024_03_11_15_48_27.zip](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/files/14561155/task_task.with.10.jobs_backup_2024_03_11_15_48_27.zip) as mentioned in this [issue comment](#7424 (comment)) ### Checklist - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch ~- [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md -->~ ~- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~ ~- [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~ - [x] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) ~- [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~ ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. --------- Co-authored-by: Maxim Zhiltsov <[email protected]>
used `exportTask` from `commands.js` and made a common function for Import Annotation
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> **Issue: ** #7605 Currently, the command used in the official documentation is not working, and giving error: 1. **Command Used**: ```shell BACKEND_POD_NAME=$(kubectl get pod --namespace $HELM_RELEASE_NAMESPACE -l tier=backend,app.kubernetes.io/instance=$HELM_RELEASE_NAME -o jsonpath='{.items[0].metadata.name}') &&\ kubectl exec -it --namespace $HELM_RELEASE_NAMESPACE $BACKEND_POD_NAME -c cvat-backend-app-container -- python manage.py createsuperuser ``` 2. **Actual Output**:  3. **Expected Output**:  ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> I have run a minikube cluster, and run the as it is command in cluster, which gives error: ```shell error: cannot exec into a container in a completed pod; current phase is Succeeded ``` ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [x] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - [x] I have updated the documentation accordingly - [x] I have added tests to cover my changes - [x] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) - [x] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. Co-authored-by: abhinav.sharma <[email protected]>
…confusion matrix across jobs (#7678) Added entry to `changelog.md` for PR fixing accumulation of confusion matrix across jobs. As mentioned in #7604 this is a PR where the necessary changelog entry has been added. ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [x] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> ~- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~ ~- [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~ ~- [ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~ ~- [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~ ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
Fixes #7678 as it breaks the CI.
1. When a task has non-zero overlap and exactly as many frames as needed
to create 1 or more complete segments, the current algorithm generates a
redundant segment at the end. For example, if size is 5, segment size is
3, and overlap is 1, it generates segments (0, 2), (2, 4), and (4, 4).
The algorithm attempts to compensate for this, but it only works in the
case where the segment size is unspecified (and defaults to the total
size).
Update the algorithm to handle this correctly in the general case.
2. The algorithm selects a default overlap size of 5 if the media file
is a video. However, this might not be a valid value if the task has a
very small segment size. In this case, a range of undesirable behaviors
may occur, depending on the segment size:
* segments getting generated such that more than 2 segments cover a
single frame;
* task creation crashing with an exception;
* a task being created with no segments at all.
Fix this by clamping the default overlap size the same way as a
user-specified one.
Fixes #7675.
…me_test [GSoC2024] add test case for subsequent annotation import
Fixes #7498 In #6968, sub tracks splitting has been fixed but not entirely, if the user wants to import tracks between more than 2 jobs it can cause malformed annotation like #7498. In the pervious test case, https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/d1a300f0189744bef01d2c60135ec474c5004fbc/tests/python/rest_api/test_tasks.py#L543-L563 skeleton track is static so it did not identify any issues. <!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context Pervious interpolate method will drop the last frame. That's correct for most cases, but if slices and tracks are like this: slice: -------------xxxxx--------- track: ---------xxxxxxxxxx------- We have to keep the last frame of slice in the track. If not, this track won't close. ### How has this been tested? I rewrited the testcase `test_can_split_skeleton_tracks_on_jobs` Now it test the split function with a longer input track and stricter interpolate reference. ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [x] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> ~~- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - [x] I have added tests to cover my changes - [x] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) - [x] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. --------- Co-authored-by: Maxim Zhiltsov <[email protected]>
It seems much simpler than the current approach, and it avoids hardcoding the `/cvat` prefix.
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> Launched the command from the server requirements [readme](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/6273b48ae66de565f740b2f839266dc5aeeaffcb/cvat/requirements/README.txt). Helps to clean other PRs from irrelevant changes. ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [ ] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [ ] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly - [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes - [ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword)) - [ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [ ] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
It has occurred to me that the documentation build happens inside the main workflow, which is configured to ignore changes to the docs when determining whether to run. So if a PR only changes the docs... we don't build the docs. That makes no sense. Fix this by extracting the documentation job into its own workflow, that always runs. The downside of this is that we have to duplicate the work of generating the SDK, but IMO, it's an acceptable sacrifice. A side effect of this is that a failure to build the docs no longer prevents the publishing of Docker images, but I don't think that was needed in the first place.
The current summaries are much too verbose. This makes it hard to find the endpoint you're looking for in the API docs, because it takes longer to read & understand each summary. Rewrite them to be more brief. Move any details that are too long to keep, but too important to omit, to the description.
…ts (#7596) <!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> See #7576 for more details. This patch extracts the high-level throttling functionality added in that patch and reuses it for quality reports. Note: in that patch I referred to this functionality as debouncing, but throttling seems like a more accurate description. It would be debouncing if the autoupdate job only ran after no updates occurred for a period, which is not how it actually works. ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [x] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~ - ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~ - ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~ ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> This PR fixes the following problem: - When user is logged-out, the /events request is still sent. Its failing due with unauthorized request creating lots of error events on the server. They are quite useless. ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - [x] I have created a changelog fragment <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes - ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~ - [x] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning)) ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern. --------- Co-authored-by: Boris Sekachev <[email protected]>
<!-- Raise an issue to propose your change (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/issues). It helps to avoid duplication of efforts from multiple independent contributors. Discuss your ideas with maintainers to be sure that changes will be approved and merged. Read the [Contribution guide](https://opencv.github.io/cvat/docs/contributing/). --> <!-- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --> ### Motivation and context <!-- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. Describe your changes in detail, add screenshots. --> `original_chunk_type` and `compressed_chunk_type` have no effect, because the task creation code overwrites these values based on `use_zip_chunks`. With `size`, the code relies on the default of zero, and attempting to overriding it will just lead to an incorrect value being saved to the database. ### How has this been tested? <!-- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. --> ### Checklist <!-- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. If an item isn't applicable for some reason, then ~~explicitly strikethrough~~ the whole line. If you don't do that, GitHub will show incorrect progress for the pull request. If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! --> - [x] I submit my changes into the `develop` branch - ~~[ ] I have created a changelog fragment~~ <!-- see top comment in CHANGELOG.md --> - ~~[ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly~~ - ~~[ ] I have added tests to cover my changes~~ - ~~[ ] I have linked related issues (see [GitHub docs]( https://help.github.com/en/github/managing-your-work-on-github/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword))~~ - ~~[ ] I have increased versions of npm packages if it is necessary ([cvat-canvas](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-canvas#versioning), [cvat-core](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-core#versioning), [cvat-data](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-data#versioning) and [cvat-ui](https://github.com/opencv/cvat/tree/develop/cvat-ui#versioning))~~ ### License - [x] I submit _my code changes_ under the same [MIT License]( https://github.com/opencv/cvat/blob/develop/LICENSE) that covers the project. Feel free to contact the maintainers if that's a concern.
cvat-bot
bot
requested review from
azhavoro,
zhiltsov-max,
bsekachev,
mdacoca,
SpecLad,
Marishka17 and
nmanovic
as code owners
|
Failed CI is classic, I do not think need to worry about that. |
Ok |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added
Removed
POST /api/tasks/{id}/dataendpoint no longer accepts several parameters that didn't have any useful function:size,compressed_chunk_type,original_chunk_type(Remove several fields fromDataSerializer#7663)Fixed
Duplicated notifications for automatic annotation (Fixed duplicated notifications for automatic annotation #7595)
Made quality report update job scheduling more efficient (Use the same algorithm to throttle quality reports as analytics reports #7596)
Incorrect file name usage when importing annotations from a cloud storage ([GSoC2024] fix and refactor import-dataset-modal code (#7428) #7599)
Using single shape annotation mode with multiple labels (https://github.com/opencv/cvat/pull/XXXX)
Part of sidebar not visible in attribute annotation mode when there are a lot of attribute values (Added overflow scroll in attribute annotation editor #7610)
Changed interpolation behavior in
annotation.py, now correctly keep the last frameInsert last frame if it is key to the track, fixes data corruption when tracks crossing more than 1 jobs ([GSoC2024] fix skeleton tracks slice between jobs #7615)
Label constructor validation of empty label names ([GSoC2024] Added Validations, testcases to Labels Constructor #7627)
Incorrect alignment of empty job list component ([GSoC2024] Resolved Issue #7620 (Changed the alignment of the empty component in job page) #7621)
Remove underlying pixels feature is not applied immediately (Fixed remove underlying pixels feature #7637)
Corrected the formula for per-class accuracy in quality reports; the old formula is now exposed as the
jaccard_indexkey (quality_control: correct the per-class accuracy formula #7640)Sending
/eventsrequest from logged-out user (Fixed sending/eventsrequests from logged out users #7608)Fixed accuracy being displayed incorrectly on the task analytics page (Fix annotation accuracy display in the UI #7652)
Fixed an invalid default overlap size being selected for video tasks with small segments (Fix two problems with the task segmentation algorithm #7681)
Fixed redundant jobs being created for tasks with non-zero overlap in certain cases (Fix two problems with the task segmentation algorithm #7681)
Accumulation of confusion matrix across all jobs in a task when creating a quality report ([GSoC2024] added accumulation of confusion matrix across various jobs #7604)
90 deg-rotated video was added with "Prefer Zip Chunks" disabled was warped, fixed using the static cropImage function. ([GSoC2024] fix warped image loading #7583)