Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

False positive "PN" should be "ON" in "PNGs" #967

Closed
emilk opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

False positive "PN" should be "ON" in "PNGs" #967

emilk opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@emilk
Copy link

emilk commented Apr 2, 2024

For some reason typos triggeres on the word PNGs:

error: `PN` should be `ON`
  --> ./rerun_cpp/docs/Doxyfile:1552:71
     |
1552 | # https://inkscape.org) to generate formulas as SVG images instead of PNGs for
     |                                                                       ^^
arnaucube added a commit to privacy-scaling-explorations/sonobe that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2024
The reason is that the last release (v1.20.0) includes new aggresive
typos that give false positives. The community is already alerting about
it, eg:
crate-ci/typos#963
crate-ci/typos#967
crate-ci/typos#970
and in our case we were geting 'RO' (random oracle) corrected to 'to',
and 'ws' (array of witnessess) to 'was'.
Keeping with version v1.19.0 while typos gets updated and a new version
is release fixing the false positives.
arnaucube added a commit to privacy-scaling-explorations/sonobe that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2024
The reason is that the last release (v1.20.0) includes new aggresive
typos that give false positives. The community is already alerting about
it, eg:
crate-ci/typos#963
crate-ci/typos#967
crate-ci/typos#970
and in our case we were geting 'RO' (random oracle) corrected to 'to',
and 'ws' (array of witnessess) to 'was'.
Keeping with version v1.19.0 while typos gets updated and a new version
is release fixing the false positives.
@epage
Copy link
Collaborator

epage commented Apr 2, 2024

Closing in favor of #745

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants