Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add @jx3box #325

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

feat: add @jx3box #325

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

X3ZvaWQ
Copy link
Contributor

@X3ZvaWQ X3ZvaWQ commented Nov 18, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated the README.md to clarify the correct field for adding scoped packages to the whitelist.
    • Retained and corrected the example JSON snippet to reference the allowScopes field.
  • New Features

    • Incremented version to 1.145.0 in package.json.
    • Added @jx3box to the allowScopes array, expanding permitted scopes for package management.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the README.md and package.json files of the unpkg-white-list project. The README.md file has been modified to clarify the correct field to update when adding scoped packages, specifically changing references from allowPackages to allowScopes. The package.json file has been updated to increment the version to 1.145.0 and to add a new entry @jx3box to the allowScopes array.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Updated documentation to clarify that allowScopes is the correct field to update for scoped packages.
package.json Incremented version to 1.145.0 and added @jx3box to the allowScopes array.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • fengmk2

🐰 In the garden, we hop and play,
With scopes and packages, bright as day.
The README now shines with clarity,
AllowScopes added, a new rarity!
Hopping along, we celebrate this feat,
In the world of code, we find our beat! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a00041 and c04cf57.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • package.json

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ _你将会看到 package.json 文件中的 `allowPackages` 字段被更新,如
npm run add -- --scope=@eggjs
```

_你将会看到 package.json 文件中的 `allowPackages` 字段被更新,如下所示:_
_你将会看到 package.json 文件中的 `allowScopes` 字段被更新,如下所示:_
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Documentation needs additional updates for consistency

The documentation still contains another instance of allowPackages that should be updated to maintain consistency with the codebase. Based on the test file and the changes, both allowPackages and allowScopes are valid but separate configuration fields serving different purposes:

  • allowScopes is for allowing entire scopes (e.g., @babel)
  • allowPackages is for allowing specific packages with version constraints

The current documentation should be reviewed to ensure it correctly distinguishes between these two fields and their purposes.

🔗 Analysis chain

Documentation fix looks good!

The update correctly references the allowScopes field instead of allowPackages when describing how to add scoped packages.

Let's verify if there are any other instances of allowPackages that might need similar updates:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining incorrect references to allowPackages in the context of scoped packages
rg -i "allowpackages.*scope" 

Length of output: 175


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of test/index.js to understand the context
cat test/index.js

Length of output: 2557


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the README.md content to see if there are any other instances of allowPackages
rg -i "allowpackages" README.md

Length of output: 104

@fengmk2
Copy link
Member

fengmk2 commented Nov 19, 2024

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit 80e5dd9 into cnpm:master Nov 19, 2024
4 checks passed
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
[skip ci]

## [1.146.0](v1.145.0...v1.146.0) (2024-11-19)

### Features

* add [@JX3BOX](https://github.com/jx3box) ([#325](#325)) ([80e5dd9](80e5dd9))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants