-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run3-gex89 Attempt to define unqiue names of materials everywhere #34927
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-34927/24735
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages:
@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @mdhildreth can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cvuosalo @civanch I have made changes and removed possibility of defining materials with the same name. Checked for materials defined for tracker, calorimeters and forward systems. The relevant cfi's are in Geometry/VeryForwardData/python (for DDD) and in Geometry/VeryForwardData/dd4hep (for DD4Hep). We can start testing now |
@cmsbuild Please test |
@bsunanda Have you seen in any preliminary tests that the discrepancies are resolved by this change? |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c0fe37/17848/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@@ -0,0 +1,377 @@ | |||
<?xml version="1.0"?> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bsunanda , there is typo in this file name ",xml"
@cmsbuild Please test |
hold |
Pull request has been put on hold by @cvuosalo |
Let's wait a little bit on this PR. It makes a big perturbation to the Geometry materials right at the same time we are checking the materials for other issues. |
unhold |
Let's go forward with this PR and get it merged soon. |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
There was a discrepancy of material budget in the tracker between the xml and db version for the dd4hep implementation. This PR tries to avoid duplicate material names which could be a cause. It was later on established that the order in which materials are defined was causing this and this was taken care of in a separate PR. However avoiding duplicate names is a good practice and defining materials with the same name but of different properties is confusing and must be avoided. |
@perrotta I tried to send a comment. It was discussed in the Simulation meetings (and chats) at great length |
+1
|
PR description:
Attempt to define unqiue names of materials everywhere. Remove duplicate names from materials.xml (which are defined in tracker.xml) and make sure that names of all materials for PPS to be preceded by PPS_
PR validation:
Use some of runTheMatrix test workflows
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Nothing special