Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[biobb_godmd] update 5.0.0 #52194

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

[biobb_godmd] update 5.0.0 #52194

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

PauAndrio
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your pull request here


Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).

General instructions

  • If this PR adds or updates a recipe, use "Add" or "Update" appropriately as the first word in its title.
  • New recipes not directly relevant to the biological sciences need to be submitted to the conda-forge channel instead of Bioconda.
  • PRs require reviews prior to being merged. Once your PR is passing tests and ready to be merged, please issue the @BiocondaBot please add label command.
  • Please post questions on Gitter or ping @bioconda/core in a comment.

Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues

Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify run_exports (see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).
Add a run_exports section like this:

build:
  run_exports:
    - ...

with ... being one of:

Case run_exports statement
semantic versioning {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}
semantic versioning (0.x.x) {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}
known breakage in minor versions {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }} (in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that)
known breakage in patch versions {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }} (in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that)
calendar versioning {{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}

while replacing "myrecipe" with either name if a name|lower variable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.

Bot commands for PR management

Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:

Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:

@BiocondaBot please update Merge the master branch into a PR.
@BiocondaBot please add label Add the please review & merge label.
@BiocondaBot please fetch artifacts Post links to CI-built packages/containers.
You can use this to test packages locally.

Note that the @BiocondaBot please merge command is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.

Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include @bioconda/<team> and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed <team>.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the meta.yaml file of the biobb_godmd package. The package version is incremented from 4.2.0 to 5.0.0, accompanied by an updated SHA256 checksum for the source tarball to correspond with the new version. The Python version requirement has been modified from >=3.8 to >=3.9, indicating a change in the minimum supported Python version. Additionally, the dependency on biobb_common has been updated from ==4.2.0 to ==5.0.0, ensuring consistency across both host and run requirements. The description field in the about section has been reformatted, but its content remains largely unchanged. Overall, the changes focus on version increments and adjustments to dependencies without altering the core functionality or structure of the package.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • adamhospital
  • gbayarri

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5b84b6 and 224fc6a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/biobb_godmd/meta.yaml (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
recipes/biobb_godmd/meta.yaml (5)

Line range hint 12-17: LGTM! Build configuration follows best practices

The build configuration is well-structured:

  • Build number correctly reset to 0 for the new version
  • Includes run_exports as recommended in the PR guidelines to prevent downstream breakage
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


45-45: LGTM! Description updates are appropriate

The description maintains the package information while correctly updating the copyright years to 2024.


10-10: Verify SHA256 checksum

Ensure the SHA256 checksum matches the source tarball from PyPI.


21-23: Verify dependency availability and compatibility

The updated requirements need verification:

  1. Python requirement increased to >=3.9
  2. biobb_common updated to 5.0.0

Also applies to: 28-29

✅ Verification successful

Python 3.9 requirement and biobb_common 5.0.0 update are justified

The codebase analysis shows:

  1. Python >=3.9 requirement aligns with the ecosystem, as multiple biobb packages (biobb_dna, biobb_mem, biobb_analysis, etc.) have already adopted this requirement
  2. biobb_common 5.0.0 is being used consistently across the biobb ecosystem:
    • biobb_dna
    • biobb_mem
    • biobb_cmip
    • biobb_analysis
    • biobb_amber
    • biobb_chemistry

The dependency updates are part of a coordinated upgrade across the biobb package ecosystem, ensuring compatibility and consistency.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if biobb_common 5.0.0 is available in bioconda
conda search -c bioconda biobb_common=5.0.0

# Check if there are any reverse dependencies that might be affected by
# the increased Python requirement
conda search -c bioconda --depends biobb_godmd | grep 'depends:.*python'

Length of output: 252


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the repository for any references to biobb_common version requirements
# and Python version requirements to understand the context better

# Search for Python version requirements in the codebase
rg -A 2 "python.*>=3\.9|>=.*python.*3\.9" 

# Search for biobb_common version references
rg -A 2 "biobb_common.*==5\.0\.0|biobb_common.*>=5\.0\.0"

# Check if there's any documentation or changelog explaining version updates
fd "CHANGELOG|README" --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 43618


2-2: Verify breaking changes for major version bump

The version bump from 4.2.0 to 5.0.0 indicates breaking changes. This aligns with the increased Python requirement (>=3.9) and updated biobb_common dependency.

✅ Verification successful

Version bump to 5.0.0 is consistent with ecosystem updates

The version bump from 4.2.0 to 5.0.0 is verified to be part of a broader ecosystem update:

  • Multiple other biobb packages have been updated to version 5.0.x
  • The package depends on biobb_common 5.0.0 (exact match)
  • Python requirement has been increased to >=3.9
  • The package description shows active maintenance through 2024
  • The changes follow a consistent pattern across the biobb ecosystem
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential breaking changes in the changelog or release notes
fd -g CHANGELOG.md -g HISTORY.md -g NEWS.md -x cat {} \; 2>/dev/null
# Check the GitHub releases page
gh api repos/bioexcel/biobb_godmd/releases/latest --jq '.body'

Length of output: 279


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the repository URL from meta.yaml to ensure we're looking at the right source
rg -l "github.com.*biobb_godmd" recipes/biobb_godmd/meta.yaml

# Check the source code URL and version tags
rg "url:|git_url:|git_rev:" recipes/biobb_godmd/meta.yaml

# Look for any documentation about version changes in README
fd -g "README*" -x cat {} \; 2>/dev/null

# Check if there are any other biobb packages with similar version bumps
fd -g "meta.yaml" -p "*biobb*" --exec grep "version =" {} \;

Length of output: 6961


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the entire meta.yaml content to understand the context better
cat recipes/biobb_godmd/meta.yaml

# Check other biobb packages in the recipes directory
find recipes -type f -name "meta.yaml" -path "*/biobb_*/*" -exec grep "version =" {} \;

# Look for any related PRs or issues that might explain the version bump
find recipes/biobb_godmd -type f -exec grep -l "5.0.0\|4.2.0" {} \;

Length of output: 3257


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants