Update panacus recipe to add cmake and c++ dependency #50982
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@heringerp has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 10 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces additional build requirements in the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/panacus/meta.yaml (1)
Update
run_exportsto include the new build requirements to ensure proper version locking.
- The current
run_exportssection does not include the newly added build requirements, which may lead to potential compatibility issues.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
15-17: Consider updating 'run_exports' to ensure proper version locking.While the added build requirements are correct, it's important to ensure that the
run_exportssection is up-to-date. This section helps prevent API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues by recording and locking the dependency versions used at build time.Please verify if the
run_exportssection needs to be updated to include any of the newly added build requirements. You can run the following command to check the currentrun_exportsconfiguration:If necessary, update the
run_exportssection to include relevant new build requirements.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the current run_exports configuration grep -A 3 "run_exports:" recipes/panacus/meta.yamlLength of output: 128
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- recipes/panacus/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
recipes/panacus/meta.yaml (1)
20-22: LGTM! The added build requirements align with the PR objectives.The addition of C++ compiler, cmake, and make as build requirements is consistent with the PR's goal of updating the panacus recipe to add cmake and C++ dependency. These changes are necessary for building newer versions of the software and follow Bioconda guidelines.
Updates the panacus recipe to add the cmake and c++ dependency that are required for newer versions.
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.Summary by CodeRabbit
These changes aim to streamline the development process and enhance compatibility.