Skip to content

Issues: bazelbuild/rules_license

Monthly public engineering meeting
#34 opened Mar 4, 2022 by aiuto
Open
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

45 Open 15 Closed
45 Open 15 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Proposal: Handling missing license / package information.
#165 opened Dec 9, 2024 by alex-torok
1
Additional fields for package_info rule / PackageInfo provider
#163 opened Oct 22, 2024 by adam-azarchs
gather_metadata doesn't transitively handle the label_keyed_string_dict_type
#160 opened Oct 2, 2024 by quic-sbjorkle
gather_metadata does not preserve tree of dependencies
#159 opened Sep 24, 2024 by shs96c
Native Java provider appears when using REPO.bazel
#158 opened Sep 23, 2024 by alexeagle
2
gather_metadata_info does not populate the package_info field of the returned TransitiveMetadataInfo
#154 opened Sep 11, 2024 by shs96c
1
Docs say this is still a proof of concept
#153 opened Sep 10, 2024 by davidben
5
README needs updating
#152 opened Sep 7, 2024 by alexeagle
@aiuto
1
Remove 'cfg.= "exec"` from license()'s license_kinds attribute when users use a new enough Bazel
#148 opened Aug 16, 2024 by gregestren
1
rules_python is declared as a dev dependency but is an actual dependency internal_cleanup P2
#145 opened Jul 30, 2024 by Zemnmez
1
gather_licenses_info does not seem to capture license of external packages P3 question Further information is requested
#140 opened Mar 19, 2024 by proppy
2
rules_license lacks compatibility with the renamed package_metadat field
#137 opened Jan 19, 2024 by Bencodes
How to use rules_license on the envoy project ? P3 question Further information is requested
#136 opened Dec 21, 2023 by aallrd
1
Update rules_jvm_external so package_info is written to generated BUILD files P1
#134 opened Oct 30, 2023 by aiuto
Update release automation so that 'push a tag' is the only action needed
#132 opened Oct 29, 2023 by alexeagle
1
style: release whole repository
#129 opened Oct 29, 2023 by alexeagle
1
3
Manifest example test doesn't work bug Something isn't working P2
#113 opened Sep 11, 2023 by mering
2
Avoid duplicate packages bug Something isn't working P2
#112 opened Sep 11, 2023 by mering
Add actual license text to JSON output enhancement New feature or request
#111 opened Sep 11, 2023 by mering
1
Populate third party license meta data enhancement New feature or request P3
#110 opened Sep 11, 2023 by mering
2
package_info should have a field for the vendor sbom
#96 opened May 18, 2023 by aiuto
@aiuto
1
Provide a user extensible compliance linter enhancement New feature or request P3
#92 opened Apr 28, 2023 by aiuto
2
Tools should not be in the default metadata gathering bug Something isn't working P2
#89 opened Apr 24, 2023 by aiuto
1
The rules to declare licenses and their kinds should be in a distinct bazel package from the ones that consume them. internal_cleanup P2
#85 opened Mar 24, 2023 by aiuto
@aiuto
1
Mechanism to exclude generating rules as target dependencies bug Something isn't working P2
#81 opened Mar 8, 2023 by rtabassum
1
ProTip! Mix and match filters to narrow down what you’re looking for.