Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HBASE-26326 CreateTableProcedure fails when FileBasedStoreFileTracker… #3721

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Oct 13, 2021

Conversation

wchevreuil
Copy link
Contributor

… is set in global config

@Apache9
Copy link
Contributor

Apache9 commented Oct 4, 2021

In general I do not like that we introduce a new init method but do not call it when verifying...

I think we should try to provide more things when constructing the StoreFileTracker. The current implementations are already lazy enough as we do not actually touch the storage, we just create some in memory objects...

So why not just pass in a RegionFileSystem for this case? Just like what we have done in the split/merge procedures.

  /**
   * Used at master side when splitting/merging regions, as we do not have a Store, thus no
   * StoreContext at master side.
   */
  public static StoreFileTracker create(Configuration conf, TableDescriptor td,
    ColumnFamilyDescriptor cfd, HRegionFileSystem regionFs) {
    StoreContext ctx =
      StoreContext.getBuilder().withColumnFamilyDescriptor(cfd).withRegionFileSystem(regionFs)
        .withFamilyStoreDirectoryPath(regionFs.getStoreDir(cfd.getNameAsString())).build();
    return StoreFileTrackerFactory.create(mergeConfigurations(conf, td, cfd), true, ctx);
  }

Thanks.

@wchevreuil
Copy link
Contributor Author

In general I do not like that we introduce a new init method but do not call it when verifying...

It's a mean to separate instantiation of SFT impls, from actual init logic. In this particular case, we need SFT impl specific logic about setting configs before we can effectively start a SFT tracker properly.

I think we should try to provide more things when constructing the StoreFileTracker. The current implementations are already lazy enough as we do not actually touch the storage, we just create some in memory objects...

So why not just pass in a RegionFileSystem for this case? Just like what we have done in the split/merge procedures.

  /**
   * Used at master side when splitting/merging regions, as we do not have a Store, thus no
   * StoreContext at master side.
   */
  public static StoreFileTracker create(Configuration conf, TableDescriptor td,
    ColumnFamilyDescriptor cfd, HRegionFileSystem regionFs) {
    StoreContext ctx =
      StoreContext.getBuilder().withColumnFamilyDescriptor(cfd).withRegionFileSystem(regionFs)
        .withFamilyStoreDirectoryPath(regionFs.getStoreDir(cfd.getNameAsString())).build();
    return StoreFileTrackerFactory.create(mergeConfigurations(conf, td, cfd), true, ctx);
  }

Thanks.

We don't have store info at CreateTable procedure time, we don't even have the regions yet by then, so how can we create a RegionFileSystem?

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 33s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+1 💚 hbaseanti 0m 0s Patch does not have any anti-patterns.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
_ HBASE-26067 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 36s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 compile 3m 42s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 13s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 19s HBASE-26067 passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 12s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 3m 36s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 3m 36s the patch passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 6s the patch passed
+1 💚 whitespace 0m 0s The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚 hadoopcheck 20m 59s Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 3.1.2 3.2.1 3.3.0.
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 30s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 15s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
54m 21s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/1/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3721
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac spotbugs hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile
uname Linux f5fbd9c17ac5 4.15.0-156-generic #163-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 19 23:31:58 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision HBASE-26067 / ab03ee1
Default Java AdoptOpenJDK-1.8.0_282-b08
Max. process+thread count 96 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/1/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 6m 5s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 3s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --whitespace-eol-ignore-list --whitespace-tabs-ignore-list --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ HBASE-26067 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 5m 3s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 20s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 9m 8s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 45s HBASE-26067 passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 49s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 22s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 1m 22s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 9m 6s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 42s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
-1 ❌ unit 215m 21s hbase-server in the patch failed.
255m 42s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/1/artifact/yetus-jdk11-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3721
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit shadedjars compile
uname Linux c1d09c78fdaf 4.15.0-142-generic #146-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 13 01:11:19 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision HBASE-26067 / ab03ee1
Default Java AdoptOpenJDK-11.0.10+9
unit https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/1/artifact/yetus-jdk11-hadoop3-check/output/patch-unit-hbase-server.txt
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3213 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/1/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 1m 32s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 4s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --whitespace-eol-ignore-list --whitespace-tabs-ignore-list --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ HBASE-26067 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 24s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 5s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 9m 2s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 39s HBASE-26067 passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 10s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 4s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 1m 4s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 9m 11s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 37s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 222m 10s hbase-server in the patch passed.
256m 0s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/1/artifact/yetus-jdk8-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3721
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit shadedjars compile
uname Linux 818e07fa20ea 4.15.0-143-generic #147-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 14 16:10:11 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision HBASE-26067 / ab03ee1
Default Java AdoptOpenJDK-1.8.0_282-b08
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3260 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/1/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache9
Copy link
Contributor

Apache9 commented Oct 5, 2021

We don't have store info at CreateTable procedure time, we don't even have the regions yet by then, so how can we create a RegionFileSystem?

Yes, this is a problem. In the first place I thought maybe we could just create a default region and then create a region file system, but it seems to tricky and a bit ugly. So we should let the implementation class to know this. A possible way is to pass in a null StoreContext, and the implementation class should check whether the StoreContext is null, if so, then it should construct itself in the 'persist store tracker configurations' mode.

Or another possible way is to force every store file tracker implementation has a static method, for persisting the store file tracker configurations. We could have separated logic in this method, so normal code path does not need to deal with null StoreContext.

I think the latter one will be cleaner but not sure if we can force the implementation class has a static method at compile time. But at least, we could introduce a UT for checking this.

WDYT? Thanks.

@wchevreuil
Copy link
Contributor Author

A possible way is to pass in a null StoreContext, and the implementation class should check whether the StoreContext is null, if so, then it should construct itself in the 'persist store tracker configurations' mode.

That could be an option, despite looking a bit hacky. Alternatively, we could ensure init() is called prior to start adding/loading/replacing store files. WDYT?

I think the latter one will be cleaner but not sure if we can force the implementation class has a static method at compile time.

That was exactly my first idea, but the lack of enforcement of static methods on implementations is a problem, IMO, which led me to the alternative solution.

But at least, we could introduce a UT for checking this.
I believe the UT I had added would catch this problem.

@Apache9
Copy link
Contributor

Apache9 commented Oct 5, 2021

The UT I mean is to check whether we have the static method for each implementation class. This is possible.
I could provide an example later.

I think this will be cleaner way. I also want to introduce a init method in the past when implementing migration store file tracker, as we will not always call load when migrating, but finally I just added a check in the StoreFileListFile, to avoid adding extra methods. For me I prefer we keep the interface simple, unless there are no other choices.

WDYT?

Thanks.

@wchevreuil
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm sorry @Apache9 , but why did you force push all these commits into the branch? I believe it had no conflicts with HBASE-26067 before.

@Apache9
Copy link
Contributor

Apache9 commented Oct 6, 2021

I just rebased HBASE-26067 against the newest master branch, and seems GitHub can not identify this type of rebase so it will show all the commits in the PR. You can do a cherry-pick to the newest HBASE-26067 and then do a force push to your branch.

Sorry for the inconvenience. In the future I will shout before doing the rebase to let others know.

@wchevreuil
Copy link
Contributor Author

I just rebased HBASE-26067 against the newest master branch, and seems GitHub can not identify this type of rebase so it will show all the commits in the PR. You can do a cherry-pick to the newest HBASE-26067 and then do a force push to your branch.

Sorry for the inconvenience. In the future I will shout before doing the rebase to let others know.

No problem, just wanted to make sure on the reason. Let me do the cherry-pick.

… is set in global config

Removed init() method from StoreFileTrakcerBase.
Added check in FileBasedStoreFileTracker constructor to ignore null StoreContext
or StoreContext instances that don't have store dir info.
@wchevreuil
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not sure why github is showing all these additional commits, it should have the option to rebase.

@wchevreuil wchevreuil changed the base branch from HBASE-26067 to master October 7, 2021 08:57
@wchevreuil wchevreuil changed the base branch from master to HBASE-26067 October 7, 2021 08:57
@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 30s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+1 💚 hbaseanti 0m 0s Patch does not have any anti-patterns.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
_ HBASE-26067 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 7s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 compile 3m 26s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 0s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 2s HBASE-26067 passed
-0 ⚠️ patch 2m 11s Used diff version of patch file. Binary files and potentially other changes not applied. Please rebase and squash commits if necessary.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 3m 39s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 3m 9s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 3m 9s the patch passed
-0 ⚠️ checkstyle 1m 3s hbase-server: The patch generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0)
+1 💚 whitespace 0m 0s The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚 hadoopcheck 18m 17s Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 3.1.2 3.2.1 3.3.0.
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 14s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 13s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
47m 40s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/8/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3721
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac spotbugs hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile
uname Linux cece6ab30775 4.15.0-156-generic #163-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 19 23:31:58 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision HBASE-26067 / c4d7d28
Default Java AdoptOpenJDK-1.8.0_282-b08
checkstyle https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/8/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/diff-checkstyle-hbase-server.txt
Max. process+thread count 96 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/8/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 27s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 3s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --whitespace-eol-ignore-list --whitespace-tabs-ignore-list --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ HBASE-26067 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 59s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 21s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 9m 6s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 48s HBASE-26067 passed
-0 ⚠️ patch 10m 6s Used diff version of patch file. Binary files and potentially other changes not applied. Please rebase and squash commits if necessary.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 32s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 18s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 1m 18s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 8m 50s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 42s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 148m 41s hbase-server in the patch passed.
182m 49s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/8/artifact/yetus-jdk11-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3721
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit shadedjars compile
uname Linux 24a43b82013b 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6 11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision HBASE-26067 / c4d7d28
Default Java AdoptOpenJDK-11.0.10+9
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/8/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 4109 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/8/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Copy link
Member

@joshelser joshelser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable enough to me, but you two are much more down in the weeds than I.

* <p/>
* This is used to avoid accidentally data loss when changing the cluster level store file tracker
* implementation, and also possible misconfiguration between master and region servers.
* <p/>
* See HBASE-26246 for more details.
* @param builder The table descriptor builder for the given table.
*/
void persistConfiguration(TableDescriptorBuilder builder);
TableDescriptor updateWithTrackerConfigs(TableDescriptorBuilder builder);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe buildWithTrackerConfigs if you're returning the TableDescriptor instead of the TableDescriptorBuilder. IMO, i'd just return the Builder back and let the caller build() when they're ready.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, i'd just return the Builder back and let the caller build() when they're ready.

Yeah, I guess that would be better. WDYT, @Apache9 ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just return void is enough. The upper layer could build it after calling this method.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 3m 3s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 4s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --whitespace-eol-ignore-list --whitespace-tabs-ignore-list --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ HBASE-26067 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 5m 30s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 29s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 9m 39s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 49s HBASE-26067 passed
-0 ⚠️ patch 10m 38s Used diff version of patch file. Binary files and potentially other changes not applied. Please rebase and squash commits if necessary.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 5m 14s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 29s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 1m 29s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 9m 42s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 48s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 229m 6s hbase-server in the patch passed.
267m 58s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/16/artifact/yetus-jdk11-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3721
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit shadedjars compile
uname Linux b09f1fcf50ef 4.15.0-142-generic #146-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 13 01:11:19 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision HBASE-26067 / c4d7d28
Default Java AdoptOpenJDK-11.0.10+9
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/16/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3220 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/16/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Copy link
Contributor

@Apache9 Apache9 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OVerall LGTM.

The only thing is what Josh proposed, let's not return TableDescriptor for StoreFileTracker.updateWithTrackConfigs.

Thanks @wchevreuil for your patience.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 33s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+1 💚 hbaseanti 0m 0s Patch does not have any anti-patterns.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
_ HBASE-26067 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 40s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 compile 4m 20s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 21s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 38s HBASE-26067 passed
-0 ⚠️ patch 2m 48s Used diff version of patch file. Binary files and potentially other changes not applied. Please rebase and squash commits if necessary.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 5m 1s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 4m 7s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 4m 7s the patch passed
-0 ⚠️ checkstyle 1m 25s hbase-server: The patch generated 5 new + 3 unchanged - 0 fixed = 8 total (was 3)
+1 💚 whitespace 0m 0s The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 💚 hadoopcheck 24m 54s Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 3.1.2 3.2.1 3.3.0.
+1 💚 spotbugs 3m 8s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 12s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
62m 28s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/17/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3721
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac spotbugs hadoopcheck hbaseanti checkstyle compile
uname Linux a60898d456e1 4.15.0-156-generic #163-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 19 23:31:58 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision HBASE-26067 / c4d7d28
Default Java AdoptOpenJDK-1.8.0_282-b08
checkstyle https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/17/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/diff-checkstyle-hbase-server.txt
Max. process+thread count 96 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/17/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Copy link
Member

@joshelser joshelser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for changing the TD->TDBuilder method return type! And thank you Duo for your continued help on reviews.

@wchevreuil wchevreuil merged commit 9c9789b into apache:HBASE-26067 Oct 13, 2021
@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 39s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 4s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --whitespace-eol-ignore-list --whitespace-tabs-ignore-list --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ HBASE-26067 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 5m 41s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 34s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 10m 20s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 48s HBASE-26067 passed
-0 ⚠️ patch 11m 19s Used diff version of patch file. Binary files and potentially other changes not applied. Please rebase and squash commits if necessary.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 5m 43s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 37s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 1m 37s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 11m 0s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 51s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 153m 22s hbase-server in the patch passed.
193m 38s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/17/artifact/yetus-jdk11-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3721
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit shadedjars compile
uname Linux 9dc663f47ebb 4.15.0-58-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 6 11:12:41 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision HBASE-26067 / c4d7d28
Default Java AdoptOpenJDK-11.0.10+9
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/17/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 4119 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/17/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 1m 18s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 4s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --whitespace-eol-ignore-list --whitespace-tabs-ignore-list --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ HBASE-26067 Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 17s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 4s HBASE-26067 passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 9m 16s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 36s HBASE-26067 passed
-0 ⚠️ patch 10m 2s Used diff version of patch file. Binary files and potentially other changes not applied. Please rebase and squash commits if necessary.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 8s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 1m 2s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 1m 2s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 9m 8s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 41s the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 220m 33s hbase-server in the patch passed.
253m 52s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/17/artifact/yetus-jdk8-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #3721
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit shadedjars compile
uname Linux bafde08461d1 4.15.0-143-generic #147-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 14 16:10:11 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision HBASE-26067 / c4d7d28
Default Java AdoptOpenJDK-1.8.0_282-b08
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/17/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 3316 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-3721/17/console
versions git=2.17.1 maven=3.6.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.12.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Apache9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2021
Apache9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2021
Apache9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2021
Apache9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2021
Apache9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2021
Apache9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2021
Apache9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2021
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2021
Apache9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2022
Apache9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2022
Apache9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2022
Apache9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2022
apurtell pushed a commit to apurtell/hbase that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2022
apurtell pushed a commit to apurtell/hbase that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2022
apurtell pushed a commit to apurtell/hbase that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2022
apurtell pushed a commit to apurtell/hbase that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2022
apurtell added a commit to apurtell/hbase that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2022
…others) to branch-2.5

Previous cherry picks:

commit 6aaef89 HBASE-26064 Introduce a StoreFileTracker to abstract the store file tracking logic
commit 43b40e9 HBASE-25988 Store the store file list by a file apache#3578)
commit 6e05376 HBASE-26079 Use StoreFileTracker when splitting and merging apache#3617)
commit 090b2fe HBASE-26224 HBASE-26224 Introduce a MigrationStoreFileTracker to support migratin… apache#3656)
commit 0ee1689 HBASE-26246 Persist the StoreFileTracker configurations to TableDescriptor when creating table apache#3666)
commit 2052e80 HBASE-26248 Should find a suitable way to let users specify the store… apache#3665)
commit 5ff0f98 HBASE-26264 Add more checks to prevent misconfiguration on store file… apache#3681)
commit fc4f6d1 HBASE-26280 HBASE-26280 Use store file tracker when snapshoting apache#3685)
commit 06db852 HBASE-26326 CreateTableProcedure fails when FileBasedStoreFileTracker… apache#3721)
commit e4e7cf8 HBASE-26386 Refactor StoreFileTracker implementations to expose the s… apache#3774)
commit 08d1171 HBASE-26328 Clone snapshot doesn't load reference files into FILE SFT impl apache#3749)
commit 8bec26e HBASE-26263 [Rolling Upgrading] Persist the StoreFileTracker configur… apache#3700)
commit a288365 HBASE-26271: Cleanup the broken store files under data directory apache#3786)
commit d00b5fa HBASE-26454 CreateTableProcedure still relies on temp dir and renames… apache#3845)
commit 771e552 HBASE-26286: Add support for specifying store file tracker when restoring or cloning snapshot
commit f16b7b1 HBASE-26265 Update ref guide to mention the new store file tracker im… apache#3942)
commit 755b3b4 HBASE-26585 Add SFT configuration to META table descriptor when creating META apache#3998)
commit 39c42c7 HBASE-26639 The implementation of TestMergesSplitsAddToTracker is pro… apache#4010)
commit 6e1f5b7 HBASE-26586 Should not rely on the global config when setting SFT implementation for a table while upgrading apache#4006)
commit f1dd865 HBASE-26654 ModifyTableDescriptorProcedure shoud load TableDescriptor… apache#4034)
commit 8fbc9a2 HBASE-26674 Should modify filesCompacting under storeWriteLock apache#4040)
commit 5aa0fd2 HBASE-26675 Data race on Compactor.writer apache#4035)
commit 3021c58 HBASE-26700 The way we bypass broken track file is not enough in Stor… apache#4055)
commit a8b68c9 HBASE-26690 Modify FSTableDescriptors to not rely on renaming when wr… apache#4054)
commit dffeb8e HBASE-26587 Introduce a new Admin API to change SFT implementation (#… apache#4080)
commit b265fe5 HBASE-26673 Implement a shell command for change SFT implementation apache#4113)
commit 4cdb380 HBASE-26640 Reimplement master local region initialization to better … apache#4111)
commit 77bb153 HBASE-26707: Reduce number of renames during bulkload (apache#4066) apache#4122)
commit a4b192e HBASE-26611 Changing SFT implementation on disabled table is dangerous apache#4082)
commit d3629bb HBASE-26837 Set SFT config when creating TableDescriptor in TestClone… apache#4226)
commit 541d748 HBASE-26881 Backport HBASE-25368 to branch-2 (apache#4267)

Fixups for precommit error prone, checkstyle, and javadoc warnings after applying cherry picks.

Signed-off-by: Josh Elser <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Wellington Ramos Chevreuil <[email protected]>
apurtell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2022
apurtell added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2022
…others) to branch-2.5

Previous cherry picks:

commit 6aaef89 HBASE-26064 Introduce a StoreFileTracker to abstract the store file tracking logic
commit 43b40e9 HBASE-25988 Store the store file list by a file #3578)
commit 6e05376 HBASE-26079 Use StoreFileTracker when splitting and merging #3617)
commit 090b2fe HBASE-26224 HBASE-26224 Introduce a MigrationStoreFileTracker to support migratin… #3656)
commit 0ee1689 HBASE-26246 Persist the StoreFileTracker configurations to TableDescriptor when creating table #3666)
commit 2052e80 HBASE-26248 Should find a suitable way to let users specify the store… #3665)
commit 5ff0f98 HBASE-26264 Add more checks to prevent misconfiguration on store file… #3681)
commit fc4f6d1 HBASE-26280 HBASE-26280 Use store file tracker when snapshoting #3685)
commit 06db852 HBASE-26326 CreateTableProcedure fails when FileBasedStoreFileTracker… #3721)
commit e4e7cf8 HBASE-26386 Refactor StoreFileTracker implementations to expose the s… #3774)
commit 08d1171 HBASE-26328 Clone snapshot doesn't load reference files into FILE SFT impl #3749)
commit 8bec26e HBASE-26263 [Rolling Upgrading] Persist the StoreFileTracker configur… #3700)
commit a288365 HBASE-26271: Cleanup the broken store files under data directory #3786)
commit d00b5fa HBASE-26454 CreateTableProcedure still relies on temp dir and renames… #3845)
commit 771e552 HBASE-26286: Add support for specifying store file tracker when restoring or cloning snapshot
commit f16b7b1 HBASE-26265 Update ref guide to mention the new store file tracker im… #3942)
commit 755b3b4 HBASE-26585 Add SFT configuration to META table descriptor when creating META #3998)
commit 39c42c7 HBASE-26639 The implementation of TestMergesSplitsAddToTracker is pro… #4010)
commit 6e1f5b7 HBASE-26586 Should not rely on the global config when setting SFT implementation for a table while upgrading #4006)
commit f1dd865 HBASE-26654 ModifyTableDescriptorProcedure shoud load TableDescriptor… #4034)
commit 8fbc9a2 HBASE-26674 Should modify filesCompacting under storeWriteLock #4040)
commit 5aa0fd2 HBASE-26675 Data race on Compactor.writer #4035)
commit 3021c58 HBASE-26700 The way we bypass broken track file is not enough in Stor… #4055)
commit a8b68c9 HBASE-26690 Modify FSTableDescriptors to not rely on renaming when wr… #4054)
commit dffeb8e HBASE-26587 Introduce a new Admin API to change SFT implementation (#… #4080)
commit b265fe5 HBASE-26673 Implement a shell command for change SFT implementation #4113)
commit 4cdb380 HBASE-26640 Reimplement master local region initialization to better … #4111)
commit 77bb153 HBASE-26707: Reduce number of renames during bulkload (#4066) #4122)
commit a4b192e HBASE-26611 Changing SFT implementation on disabled table is dangerous #4082)
commit d3629bb HBASE-26837 Set SFT config when creating TableDescriptor in TestClone… #4226)
commit 541d748 HBASE-26881 Backport HBASE-25368 to branch-2 (#4267)

Fixups for precommit error prone, checkstyle, and javadoc warnings after applying cherry picks.

Signed-off-by: Josh Elser <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Wellington Ramos Chevreuil <[email protected]>
vinayakphegde pushed a commit to vinayakphegde/hbase that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2024
apache#3721)

Amend HBASE-26326 - HBASE-21515 has been challenging to backport into this branch.
For HBASE-26326, we actually only need the changes HBASE-21515 added to ReflectionUtils,
so I had given up on attempting to bring in HBASE-21515 and am adding these required changes
as an amend to HBASE-26326.

Change-Id: I82e9e2f44a2b64fa0423531cd1775ce55a1e1607
Signed-off-by: Duo Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Josh Elser <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants