Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HBASE-26097: to resolve hbase version 2.x protobuf version conflict #3502

Closed
wants to merge 2,901 commits into from

Conversation

zyxxoo
Copy link

@zyxxoo zyxxoo commented Jul 19, 2021

No description provided.

saintstack and others added 30 commits February 8, 2021 14:38
…illegal tablename error

Revert of a revert -- i.e. a reapply -- that adds in the JIRA # missing
from original commit.
…java.io.IOException: Invalid HFile block magic" (apache#2882)

Signed-off-by: Ramkrishna <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: stack <[email protected]>
…he#2938)

Signed-off-by: Viraj Jasani <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: stack <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wellington Chevreuil <[email protected]>
…he double comparison process (apache#2741)

Signed-off-by: niuyulin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: stack <[email protected]>
…iately without retrying (apache#2943)

Signed-off-by: Wellington Chevreuil <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: stack <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: shahrs87
…ngs (apache#2965)

ProtobufLogReader#readNext may be called by code that attempts to advance
the reader but does not necessarily expect to succeed, for example
WALEntryStream#tryAdvanceEntry. Much of the logging in this method is
at TRACE level. Other logging at WARN level will be frequently emitted, as
often as several per minute, and this will cause false positive assessment
from operators that they are experiencing a bug. Fix the mixed intent with
respect to log levels in readNext. Log at only DEBUG level or below.

Signed-off-by: Sean Busbey <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Duo Zhang <[email protected]>

Closes apache#2983
…cases where set exclude-namespace/exclude-table-cfs (apache#2969)

Signed-off-by: Wellington Chevreuil <[email protected]>
ServerCall.java: calling wrapWithSasl() was moved to getResponse(), so
the SASL wrapping is delayed until the reply is sent back to the client.

Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Duo Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Kumar<[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 5d9a6ed)
Apache9 and others added 20 commits June 30, 2021 11:46
apache#3419)

* HBASE-26027 The calling of HTable.batch blocked at AsyncRequestFutureImpl.waitUntilDone caused by ArrayStoreException
…Utils.printThreadInfo() (apache#3442)

Signed-off-by: Michael Stack <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Duo Zhang <[email protected]>
…e#3445)

Signed-off-by: Michael Stack <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Duo Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Viraj Jasani <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 82c44b4)
…d creating regionPlan (ADDENDUM) (apache#3455)

Signed-off-by: David Manning <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bharath Vissapragada <[email protected]>
…backport

Signed-off-by: Duo Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: stack <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]>
…s NullPointerException (apache#3480)

Signed-off-by: Duo Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anoop Sam John <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Reid Chan <[email protected]>
…backport (apache#3475)


    Signed-off-by: Duo Zhang <[email protected]>
    Signed-off-by: stack <[email protected]>
    Reviewed-by: Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]>
…ing CombinedBlockCache (apache#3473)

Signed-off-by Anoop Sam John <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Reid Chan <[email protected]>
pom.xml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Apache9
Copy link
Contributor

Apache9 commented Jul 22, 2021

HBase 2.0.x is alread EOL. If this is for 2.x only, please open a PR against branch-2?

Thanks.

@zyxxoo
Copy link
Author

zyxxoo commented Jul 22, 2021

HBase 2.0.x is alread EOL. If this is for 2.x only, please open a PR against branch-2?

Thanks.

Hi, i have opened a new PR #3515, please review again

@saintstack
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in favor of #3515

@saintstack
Copy link
Contributor

Actually close!

@saintstack saintstack closed this Aug 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.