[CI][MATLAB][Packaging] Add support for MATLAB R2024a in CI and crossbow packaging workflows
#41385
Assignees
Milestone
Comments
kevingurney
changed the title
R2024a in CI and crossbow packaging workflows
kevingurney
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 25, 2024
…os-latest` change to `macos-14` (#41384) ### Rationale for this change * The MATLAB macOS CI workflow is failing because of the recent change to `macos-latest` from `macos-12` to `macos-14`. * In https://github.blog/changelog/2024-01-30-github-actions-macos-14-sonoma-is-now-available/ it is mentioned that the transition to `macos-14` was planned for April-June 2024. * As noted in the [Platform Road Map](https://www.mathworks.com/support/requirements/platform-road-map.html), MATLAB R2023a is not officially supported with `macos-14`. * Until we can move to building against MATLAB R2024a (latest available version of MATLAB), it makes sense to pin back the macOS version to version 14. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Pin back MATLAB CI workflow to use `macos-12`. 2. Pin back MATLAB crossbow packaging workflow to use `macos-12`. ### Are these changes tested? I will run a crossbow job and ensure that the MATLAB CI workflow passes successfully before merging this PR. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. ### Future Directions 1. #41385 ### Notes 1. Thanks @ sgilmore10 for your help with this pull request! * GitHub Issue: #41370 Authored-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]>
raulcd
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 29, 2024
…os-latest` change to `macos-14` (#41384) ### Rationale for this change * The MATLAB macOS CI workflow is failing because of the recent change to `macos-latest` from `macos-12` to `macos-14`. * In https://github.blog/changelog/2024-01-30-github-actions-macos-14-sonoma-is-now-available/ it is mentioned that the transition to `macos-14` was planned for April-June 2024. * As noted in the [Platform Road Map](https://www.mathworks.com/support/requirements/platform-road-map.html), MATLAB R2023a is not officially supported with `macos-14`. * Until we can move to building against MATLAB R2024a (latest available version of MATLAB), it makes sense to pin back the macOS version to version 14. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Pin back MATLAB CI workflow to use `macos-12`. 2. Pin back MATLAB crossbow packaging workflow to use `macos-12`. ### Are these changes tested? I will run a crossbow job and ensure that the MATLAB CI workflow passes successfully before merging this PR. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. ### Future Directions 1. #41385 ### Notes 1. Thanks @ sgilmore10 for your help with this pull request! * GitHub Issue: #41370 Authored-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]>
sgilmore10
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 30, 2024
…1436) ### Rationale for this change @ kevingurney and I recently resolved multiple issues related to `mathworks/libmexclass` not supporting ARM-based macOS builds (i.e. builds on `macos-14`): - mathworks/libmexclass#76 - mathworks/libmexclass#77 We should bump the version of mathworks/libmexclass used by the MATLAB interface to the latest available commit ([ca3cea6](mathworks/libmexclass@ca3cea6) as of now) in order to enable building the MATLAB interface to Arrow on `macos-14` (which is ARM-based). ### What changes are included in this PR? - Bumped version of `mathworks/libmexclass` used by the MATLAB interface to [ca3cea6](mathworks/libmexclass@ca3cea6) ### Are these changes tested? - Yes. The existing test points verify verify upgrading `mathworks/libmexclass` does not break the MATLAB interface. ### Are there any user-facing changes? - No. ### Future Directions - #41435 - #41385 * GitHub Issue: #41400 Authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]>
tolleybot
pushed a commit
to tmct/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 2, 2024
…f `macos-latest` change to `macos-14` (apache#41384) ### Rationale for this change * The MATLAB macOS CI workflow is failing because of the recent change to `macos-latest` from `macos-12` to `macos-14`. * In https://github.blog/changelog/2024-01-30-github-actions-macos-14-sonoma-is-now-available/ it is mentioned that the transition to `macos-14` was planned for April-June 2024. * As noted in the [Platform Road Map](https://www.mathworks.com/support/requirements/platform-road-map.html), MATLAB R2023a is not officially supported with `macos-14`. * Until we can move to building against MATLAB R2024a (latest available version of MATLAB), it makes sense to pin back the macOS version to version 14. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Pin back MATLAB CI workflow to use `macos-12`. 2. Pin back MATLAB crossbow packaging workflow to use `macos-12`. ### Are these changes tested? I will run a crossbow job and ensure that the MATLAB CI workflow passes successfully before merging this PR. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. ### Future Directions 1. apache#41385 ### Notes 1. Thanks @ sgilmore10 for your help with this pull request! * GitHub Issue: apache#41370 Authored-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]>
tolleybot
pushed a commit
to tmct/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 2, 2024
…6` (apache#41436) ### Rationale for this change @ kevingurney and I recently resolved multiple issues related to `mathworks/libmexclass` not supporting ARM-based macOS builds (i.e. builds on `macos-14`): - mathworks/libmexclass#76 - mathworks/libmexclass#77 We should bump the version of mathworks/libmexclass used by the MATLAB interface to the latest available commit ([ca3cea6](mathworks/libmexclass@ca3cea6) as of now) in order to enable building the MATLAB interface to Arrow on `macos-14` (which is ARM-based). ### What changes are included in this PR? - Bumped version of `mathworks/libmexclass` used by the MATLAB interface to [ca3cea6](mathworks/libmexclass@ca3cea6) ### Are these changes tested? - Yes. The existing test points verify verify upgrading `mathworks/libmexclass` does not break the MATLAB interface. ### Are there any user-facing changes? - No. ### Future Directions - apache#41435 - apache#41385 * GitHub Issue: apache#41400 Authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]>
sgilmore10
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 3, 2024
…CI and crossbow packaging workflows (#41504) ### Rationale for this change MATLAB `R2024a` is the latest available version of MATLAB as of April 2024. We are currently building against MATLAB `R2023a` in CI and for the crossbow packaging workflow. We should update the version of MATLAB we support to the latest available version. We previously created an issue to use `R2023b` (#37809). However, `R2024a` has become publicly available since then. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Changed the `release` argument supplied to `matlab-actions/setup-matlab@ v2` to `R2024a` from `R2023a` in `.github/workflows/matlab.yml` and `dev/tasks/matlab/github.yml`. 2. Updated the script used to package the MLTBX file (`arrow/matlab/tools/packageMatlabInterface.m`) to specify the version of MATLAB currently running as the only compatible version of MATLAB for the interface. 3. Updated display tests to react to a change in how class names are formatted when an objected is displayed in the Command Window. ### Are these changes tested? Yes. Existing tests used. ### Are there any user-facing changes? There are no changes to the MATLAB Arrow Interface. However, the MATLAB release used to build, test, and package the interface has been upgraded. ### Future Work 1. We may want to consider building and packaging against multiple versions of MATLAB in parallel, rather than just the latest. This would require some more thought on how many releases back to support over time, however. 2. #41435 * GitHub Issue: #41385 Lead-authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]>
|
Issue resolved by pull request 41504 |
tolleybot
pushed a commit
to tmct/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 4, 2024
…f `macos-latest` change to `macos-14` (apache#41384) ### Rationale for this change * The MATLAB macOS CI workflow is failing because of the recent change to `macos-latest` from `macos-12` to `macos-14`. * In https://github.blog/changelog/2024-01-30-github-actions-macos-14-sonoma-is-now-available/ it is mentioned that the transition to `macos-14` was planned for April-June 2024. * As noted in the [Platform Road Map](https://www.mathworks.com/support/requirements/platform-road-map.html), MATLAB R2023a is not officially supported with `macos-14`. * Until we can move to building against MATLAB R2024a (latest available version of MATLAB), it makes sense to pin back the macOS version to version 14. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Pin back MATLAB CI workflow to use `macos-12`. 2. Pin back MATLAB crossbow packaging workflow to use `macos-12`. ### Are these changes tested? I will run a crossbow job and ensure that the MATLAB CI workflow passes successfully before merging this PR. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. ### Future Directions 1. apache#41385 ### Notes 1. Thanks @ sgilmore10 for your help with this pull request! * GitHub Issue: apache#41370 Authored-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]>
rok
pushed a commit
to tmct/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2024
…f `macos-latest` change to `macos-14` (apache#41384) ### Rationale for this change * The MATLAB macOS CI workflow is failing because of the recent change to `macos-latest` from `macos-12` to `macos-14`. * In https://github.blog/changelog/2024-01-30-github-actions-macos-14-sonoma-is-now-available/ it is mentioned that the transition to `macos-14` was planned for April-June 2024. * As noted in the [Platform Road Map](https://www.mathworks.com/support/requirements/platform-road-map.html), MATLAB R2023a is not officially supported with `macos-14`. * Until we can move to building against MATLAB R2024a (latest available version of MATLAB), it makes sense to pin back the macOS version to version 14. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Pin back MATLAB CI workflow to use `macos-12`. 2. Pin back MATLAB crossbow packaging workflow to use `macos-12`. ### Are these changes tested? I will run a crossbow job and ensure that the MATLAB CI workflow passes successfully before merging this PR. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. ### Future Directions 1. apache#41385 ### Notes 1. Thanks @ sgilmore10 for your help with this pull request! * GitHub Issue: apache#41370 Authored-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]>
rok
pushed a commit
to tmct/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2024
…f `macos-latest` change to `macos-14` (apache#41384) ### Rationale for this change * The MATLAB macOS CI workflow is failing because of the recent change to `macos-latest` from `macos-12` to `macos-14`. * In https://github.blog/changelog/2024-01-30-github-actions-macos-14-sonoma-is-now-available/ it is mentioned that the transition to `macos-14` was planned for April-June 2024. * As noted in the [Platform Road Map](https://www.mathworks.com/support/requirements/platform-road-map.html), MATLAB R2023a is not officially supported with `macos-14`. * Until we can move to building against MATLAB R2024a (latest available version of MATLAB), it makes sense to pin back the macOS version to version 14. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Pin back MATLAB CI workflow to use `macos-12`. 2. Pin back MATLAB crossbow packaging workflow to use `macos-12`. ### Are these changes tested? I will run a crossbow job and ensure that the MATLAB CI workflow passes successfully before merging this PR. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. ### Future Directions 1. apache#41385 ### Notes 1. Thanks @ sgilmore10 for your help with this pull request! * GitHub Issue: apache#41370 Authored-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]>
vibhatha
pushed a commit
to vibhatha/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 25, 2024
…f `macos-latest` change to `macos-14` (apache#41384) ### Rationale for this change * The MATLAB macOS CI workflow is failing because of the recent change to `macos-latest` from `macos-12` to `macos-14`. * In https://github.blog/changelog/2024-01-30-github-actions-macos-14-sonoma-is-now-available/ it is mentioned that the transition to `macos-14` was planned for April-June 2024. * As noted in the [Platform Road Map](https://www.mathworks.com/support/requirements/platform-road-map.html), MATLAB R2023a is not officially supported with `macos-14`. * Until we can move to building against MATLAB R2024a (latest available version of MATLAB), it makes sense to pin back the macOS version to version 14. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Pin back MATLAB CI workflow to use `macos-12`. 2. Pin back MATLAB crossbow packaging workflow to use `macos-12`. ### Are these changes tested? I will run a crossbow job and ensure that the MATLAB CI workflow passes successfully before merging this PR. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. ### Future Directions 1. apache#41385 ### Notes 1. Thanks @ sgilmore10 for your help with this pull request! * GitHub Issue: apache#41370 Authored-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]>
vibhatha
pushed a commit
to vibhatha/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 25, 2024
…6` (apache#41436) ### Rationale for this change @ kevingurney and I recently resolved multiple issues related to `mathworks/libmexclass` not supporting ARM-based macOS builds (i.e. builds on `macos-14`): - mathworks/libmexclass#76 - mathworks/libmexclass#77 We should bump the version of mathworks/libmexclass used by the MATLAB interface to the latest available commit ([ca3cea6](mathworks/libmexclass@ca3cea6) as of now) in order to enable building the MATLAB interface to Arrow on `macos-14` (which is ARM-based). ### What changes are included in this PR? - Bumped version of `mathworks/libmexclass` used by the MATLAB interface to [ca3cea6](mathworks/libmexclass@ca3cea6) ### Are these changes tested? - Yes. The existing test points verify verify upgrading `mathworks/libmexclass` does not break the MATLAB interface. ### Are there any user-facing changes? - No. ### Future Directions - apache#41435 - apache#41385 * GitHub Issue: apache#41400 Authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]>
vibhatha
pushed a commit
to vibhatha/arrow
that referenced
this issue
May 25, 2024
…a` in CI and crossbow packaging workflows (apache#41504) ### Rationale for this change MATLAB `R2024a` is the latest available version of MATLAB as of April 2024. We are currently building against MATLAB `R2023a` in CI and for the crossbow packaging workflow. We should update the version of MATLAB we support to the latest available version. We previously created an issue to use `R2023b` (apache#37809). However, `R2024a` has become publicly available since then. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Changed the `release` argument supplied to `matlab-actions/setup-matlab@ v2` to `R2024a` from `R2023a` in `.github/workflows/matlab.yml` and `dev/tasks/matlab/github.yml`. 2. Updated the script used to package the MLTBX file (`arrow/matlab/tools/packageMatlabInterface.m`) to specify the version of MATLAB currently running as the only compatible version of MATLAB for the interface. 3. Updated display tests to react to a change in how class names are formatted when an objected is displayed in the Command Window. ### Are these changes tested? Yes. Existing tests used. ### Are there any user-facing changes? There are no changes to the MATLAB Arrow Interface. However, the MATLAB release used to build, test, and package the interface has been upgraded. ### Future Work 1. We may want to consider building and packaging against multiple versions of MATLAB in parallel, rather than just the latest. This would require some more thought on how many releases back to support over time, however. 2. apache#41435 * GitHub Issue: apache#41385 Lead-authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sarah Gilmore <[email protected]>
CurtHagenlocher
pushed a commit
to CurtHagenlocher/arrow
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2024
…f `macos-latest` change to `macos-14` (apache#41384) ### Rationale for this change * The MATLAB macOS CI workflow is failing because of the recent change to `macos-latest` from `macos-12` to `macos-14`. * In https://github.blog/changelog/2024-01-30-github-actions-macos-14-sonoma-is-now-available/ it is mentioned that the transition to `macos-14` was planned for April-June 2024. * As noted in the [Platform Road Map](https://www.mathworks.com/support/requirements/platform-road-map.html), MATLAB R2023a is not officially supported with `macos-14`. * Until we can move to building against MATLAB R2024a (latest available version of MATLAB), it makes sense to pin back the macOS version to version 14. ### What changes are included in this PR? 1. Pin back MATLAB CI workflow to use `macos-12`. 2. Pin back MATLAB crossbow packaging workflow to use `macos-12`. ### Are these changes tested? I will run a crossbow job and ensure that the MATLAB CI workflow passes successfully before merging this PR. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No. ### Future Directions 1. apache#41385 ### Notes 1. Thanks @ sgilmore10 for your help with this pull request! * GitHub Issue: apache#41370 Authored-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kevin Gurney <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the enhancement requested
MATLAB R2024a is the latest available version of MATLAB as of April 2024.
We are currently building against MATLAB R2023a in CI and for the crossbow packaging workflow.
We should update the version of MATLAB we support to the latest available version.
We previously created an issue to use R2023b (#37809). However, R2024a has become publicly available since then.
We may want to consider building and packaging against multiple versions of MATLAB in parallel, rather than just the latest. This would require some more thought on how many releases back to support over time, however.
Component(s)
Continuous Integration, MATLAB, Packaging
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: