-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Explore spaces - no members filter for not authenticated, no text on top #6871
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the English translation file and enhancements to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json (1)
Line range hint
12-24
: Review the $20 service fee logic for discounted bills.The current implementation adds a flat $20 service fee to any discounted amount. For lower tier discounts (like 10%) on smaller bills, this can result in a higher total than the original bill, negating the discount benefit.
For example, a $100 bill with a 10% discount becomes $110 after the $20 fee.
Consider adjusting the fee structure or discount percentages to ensure the loyalty discounts always result in a lower final bill compared to the original amount. This better aligns with customer expectations for a loyalty program.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json (1 hunks)
- src/main/topLevelPages/topLevelSpaces/SpaceExplorerView.tsx (6 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
src/main/topLevelPages/topLevelSpaces/SpaceExplorerView.tsx (6)
3-3
: LGTM!The import statement for
InfoOutlinedIcon
is correct and necessary for using the icon component in the code.
7-7
: LGTM!The import statement for
Box
,Button
,DialogContent
, andIconButton
from@mui/material
is correct and necessary for using these components in the code.
25-26
: LGTM!The import statements for
DialogWithGrid
andDialogHeader
are correct and necessary for using these components in the code.
127-131
: LGTM!The new state variables
infoOpen
andactiveFilters
are correctly initialized and will be used to manage the informational dialog and membership filters respectively.
156-165
: LGTM!The
useEffect
hook correctly updates theactiveFilters
state to include the 'Member' filter for authenticated users, ensuring that they have access to more filtering options. This change aligns with the PR objective of modifying the functionality related to the "Explore spaces" feature based on user authentication status.
Line range hint
171-261
: LGTM!The changes to the rendering logic and the addition of the informational dialog are well-implemented and align with the PR objectives. Specifically:
- The rendering logic now utilizes the
activeFilters
state for a more flexible and dynamic filtering system, allowing for different filter options based on user authentication status.- The informational dialog, triggered by the
IconButton
withInfoOutlinedIcon
, enhances the user experience by providing additional context about space exploration.These changes improve the interactivity and usability of the
SpaceExplorerView
component.
#6852
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes