Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove the activity block from space community page #6951

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bobbykolev
Copy link
Contributor

@bobbykolev bobbykolev commented Sep 27, 2024

#6933

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Simplified the Space Community Page by removing the activity log section, allowing for a clearer focus on community contributors.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Eliminated unnecessary logic related to activity tracking and permissions, enhancing page performance and user experience.

@bobbykolev bobbykolev requested a review from ccanos September 27, 2024 08:49
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request focus on simplifying the SpaceCommunityPage.tsx by removing the activity log and associated functionalities. This includes eliminating imports, the useEffect hook for fetching activities, and permissions logic. The component is now streamlined to display community contributors without the clutter of the activity section.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/domain/journey/space/SpaceCommunityPage/SpaceCommunityPage.tsx Removed activity tracking imports, logic, and rendering components related to the activity log.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ccanos: Suggested as a reviewer for this PR.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/domain/journey/space/SpaceCommunityPage/SpaceCommunityPage.tsx (2)

Line range hint 1-28: LGTM! Consider cleaning up unused imports.

The removal of imports related to activity tracking aligns with the PR objective. The addition of useUserContext is appropriate for handling user authentication.

Please verify if all remaining imports are still used in the component. If any are no longer needed, consider removing them to keep the codebase clean.


Line range hint 91-137: LGTM! Consider reviewing component responsiveness.

The removal of activity-related components from the render tree aligns with the PR objective. The remaining structure appropriately focuses on community contributors and callouts.

Since the layout has changed, it might be worth reviewing the component's responsiveness on different screen sizes to ensure a consistent user experience across devices.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 881ac66 and d0c2111.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/domain/journey/space/SpaceCommunityPage/SpaceCommunityPage.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/domain/journey/space/SpaceCommunityPage/SpaceCommunityPage.tsx (2)

Line range hint 30-40: LGTM! Verify the impact of simplified permissions logic.

The removal of activity-related logic and state is in line with the PR objective. The use of useUserContext for authentication is a good practice.

Please verify that the simplified permissions logic doesn't unintentionally expose any sensitive information or functionality. Run the following script to check for any remaining references to the removed permissions:

Also applies to: 85-89

✅ Verification successful

Permissions Logic Simplification Verified

The permissions logic has been successfully simplified without exposing any sensitive information. No remaining references to the removed permissions were found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to removed permissions logic

# Test: Search for references to removed permissions. Expect: No results.
rg --type typescript "AuthorizationPrivilege.ReadActivities" src/

Length of output: 100


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for references to removed permissions in TypeScript files.

# Test: Search for references to removed permissions. Expect: No results.
rg "AuthorizationPrivilege.ReadActivities" src/ --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"

Length of output: 76


Line range hint 1-140: Overall implementation looks good. Consider these final checks.

The changes successfully remove the activity block from the Space Community Page, aligning with the PR objective. The code has been simplified and focuses on rendering community contributors and callouts.

To ensure a smooth integration, please consider the following:

  1. Verify that all remaining imports are still used and remove any that are not.
  2. Double-check that the simplified permissions logic doesn't unintentionally expose any sensitive information or functionality.
  3. Test the component's responsiveness on different screen sizes to ensure a consistent user experience.
  4. Update any relevant documentation or comments that might reference the removed activity block.

Run the following script to check for any remaining references to the removed activity functionality:

@bobbykolev bobbykolev merged commit 480baad into develop Oct 1, 2024
3 checks passed
@bobbykolev bobbykolev deleted the client-6933 branch October 1, 2024 15:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants