-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make refactor #164
Make refactor #164
Conversation
I was wrong about Is there good reason not to map each unpaired fastq file separately and compile them after the mapping? |
sangers = filter(is_sanger, files) | ||
def convert_file(fn): | ||
reads = list(SeqIO.parse(fn, 'fastq')) | ||
os.remove(fn) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If an exception is raised in this block you will lose the file
…into make-refactor Conflicts: plan.md play/Makefile
no one wanted you :( |
see discussion in #156 #155 #152
The current plan is to use jinja templating