Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Relationship feedback synopsis is confusing #189

Closed
gtsueng opened this issue Jul 1, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Relationship feedback synopsis is confusing #189

gtsueng opened this issue Jul 1, 2016 · 5 comments
Assignees
@gtsueng

Comments

@gtsueng
Copy link
Collaborator

gtsueng commented Jul 1, 2016

The text for the two concepts displayed may be synonymous to what was actually shown to the users, but it doesn't appear in the text.

Eg. For this doc: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21565631
(BTW- the link to pubmed from that very same page works great)

The concepts shown are 'ALADIN' and various synonyms of the diseases that are actually in the text. However, unless you know that AAAS gene (shown in text) is ALADIN (displayed in feedback(, this will be confusing. Additionally, Achalasia of Cardia (displayed in feedback) is shown instead of Achalasia (shown in text).

Picture of synopsis view of feedback from this doc.
synonym not the same almost looks like a different doc
@x0xMaximus
Copy link
Member

@gtsueng Is there a desired actionable on this? What is a proposed change? I see a few options:

  • Only show the specific word exactly that the user was presented (this would require we address the details of concept <<>> text selection more specificly and develop a smarter way to do this selection)
  • Show the all optional words / text for the specific concept

@gtsueng
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gtsueng commented Jul 11, 2016

How is the display being handled when it's being presented to the user for relationship extraction? Can the same strategy be employed for the text selection of the concept?

@gtsueng
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gtsueng commented Jul 11, 2016

wrong concept feedback
It's a really hard leap to make to go from 'decrease of retinal nerve fiber' (abstract text) to 'hyperreflexia' (feedback text)

x0xMaximus added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2016
@x0xMaximus
Addresses #189
ed15af3
@x0xMaximus
Copy link
Member

I approached this solution via method 1. We're now doing a better job of making sure the concept text that was used for that concept is the same across all apis / MySQL. It's now pulled on production so you can start to test it

@gtsueng
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gtsueng commented Jul 13, 2016

From my tests, it looks like the fix has resolved the problem.

@gtsueng gtsueng closed this as completed Jul 13, 2016
x0xMaximus added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2016
@x0xMaximus
Merge branch 'migrations-prior-css'
2f4b85c 
* migrations-prior-css: (21 commits)
  Addresses #184
  Addresses #189
  Addresses #180
  [Sentry] fixes #139428581 #139428586 #139610697
  [Redirect / URLs] not auth dashboard redirect
  [STATIC] new jquery 3.0.0 in repo
  [Small CSS] $color_error_red usage 4 back on Tree
  Addresses #102. Pull to prod.
  Addresses #102
  Addresses #28
  Quest loading css
  Addresses #11
  Addresses #135
  [Progress] Addresses #135
  Addresses #141
  More cleanup of verbose js imports from externals
  Closes #151
  Addresses #181
  Addresses #180
  Remove dangerous d3 import from group_home page.
  ...

# Conflicts:
#	static/css/style.css
#	static/scss/style.scss
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@gtsueng gtsueng

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@x0xMaximus @gtsueng