[13.0][FIX] l10n_ch_base_bank #603
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken. It seems to be related to this new change introduced by * odoo/odoo#67599 Which test the valid of the type journal. So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.
yvaucher
reviewed
Mar 29, 2021
Well both test file started different. One created a res.partner.bank and the other not. |
|
@yvaucher Do you want to have another look at this ? |
yvaucher
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2021
SimoneVagile
pushed a commit
to SimoneVagile/l10n-switzerland
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2021
* [13.0][FIX] l10n_ch_base_bank On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken. It seems to be related to this new change introduced by * odoo/odoo#67599 Which test the valid of the type journal. So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.
TDu
added a commit
to camptocamp/l10n-switzerland
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2021
This is a forward port of * OCA#603 On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken. It seems to be related to this new change introduced by * odoo/odoo#67599 Which test the valid of the type journal. So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.
sonhd91
pushed a commit
to sonhd91/l10n-switzerland
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2021
This is a forward port of * OCA#603 On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken. It seems to be related to this new change introduced by * odoo/odoo#67599 Which test the valid of the type journal. So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.
sonhd91
pushed a commit
to sonhd91/l10n-switzerland
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2021
This is a forward port of * OCA#603 On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken. It seems to be related to this new change introduced by * odoo/odoo#67599 Which test the valid of the type journal. So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.
sonhd91
pushed a commit
to sonhd91/l10n-switzerland
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2022
This is a forward port of * OCA#603 On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken. It seems to be related to this new change introduced by * odoo/odoo#67599 Which test the valid of the type journal. So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.
ivantodorovich
pushed a commit
to camptocamp/l10n-switzerland
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2023
This is a forward port of * OCA#603 On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken. It seems to be related to this new change introduced by * odoo/odoo#67599 Which test the valid of the type journal. So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.
ivantodorovich
pushed a commit
to camptocamp/l10n-switzerland
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2023
This is a forward port of * OCA#603 On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken. It seems to be related to this new change introduced by * odoo/odoo#67599 Which test the valid of the type journal. So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.
sonhd91
pushed a commit
to sonhd91/l10n-switzerland
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2023
This is a forward port of * OCA#603 On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken. It seems to be related to this new change introduced by * odoo/odoo#67599 Which test the valid of the type journal. So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.
nguyenminhchien
pushed a commit
to nguyenminhchien/l10n-switzerland
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2024
This is a forward port of * OCA#603 On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken. It seems to be related to this new change introduced by * odoo/odoo#67599 Which test the valid of the type journal. So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.
BT-anieto
pushed a commit
to BT-anieto/l10n-switzerland
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2024
This is a forward port of * OCA#603 On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken. It seems to be related to this new change introduced by * odoo/odoo#67599 Which test the valid of the type journal. So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken.
It seems to be related to this new change introduced by
Which test the valid of the type journal.
So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.