[14.0][FIX] l10n_ch_base_bank (Forward port) #616
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is a forward port of * OCA#603 On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken. It seems to be related to this new change introduced by * odoo/odoo#67599 Which test the valid of the type journal. So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.
|
Oh I did not see there was already this one #609 |
This was referenced Sep 10, 2021
mmequignon
approved these changes
Sep 14, 2021
|
/ocabot merge patch |
|
Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you. |
|
This PR has the |
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at a57cb30. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a forward port of
On an unrelated PR the test for l10n_ch_base_bank were broken.
It seems to be related to this new change introduced by
Which test the valid of the type journal.
So this fixes the test, but I am not sure if they are still meaningfull.