[24.05] python3Packages.js2py: remove usage in other packages

[samueltardieu]

(cherry picked from commit 0f79dd4)

Manual backport of #349550

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[ruby0b]

pyload-ng build failure now no longer tells you that the reason is the vulnerability but that's probably fine

[tomodachi94]

I'm not sure this is acceptable as-is for a release, given that this removes a package (a breaking change). Maybe we should just remove the uses of the package, but leave the package intact?

c.f. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#changes-acceptable-for-releases

[tomodachi94]

See #351479 (comment)

[samueltardieu]

Makes sense. I've amended the PR to not remove js2py itself.

[tomodachi94]

Changes lgtm, let's wait for Ofborg and then we can merge this.

[tomodachi94]

Thank you!