M2 Query I/O Port Descriptors for Study via API

[elisabettai]

• Extend existing APIs (computational API, study creation and access, platform API), add new APIs (progress API, import/export API) as required by users and in support of the DRC APIs
  -- exposing queuering of service & study input/output port descriptions

Deadline: Month 2

Wrike M4.1.1

[pcrespov]

Goal for sprint Katherine Switzer

• Expose in the API: "a study, mark inputs/outputs and get schemas in api" (part of meta-modeling #626)
• Expose json-schema ports for solvers in api-server osparc-simcore#3457

REVIEW:

• show json-schema of a published solver in swagger (e.g. solver with rich i/o)
• Use json-forms to create a UI on a local Portal deploy for that input (nice to have, @ignapas @odeimaiz could help)

[pcrespov]

Update on sprint Katherine Switzer

Done

• Expose json-schema ports for solvers in api-server osparc-simcore#3457
• Proof-of-concept on how to integrate this feature in sparc.science app using json-forms. Will be shared with MAP-Core in the context of M4.4 SIM API support

Ongoing

• Expose in the web API: "a study, mark inputs/outputs and get schemas in api" (part of meta-modeling #626)
• Expose studies resources and its i/o ports in public API

[pcrespov]

Goal for sprint Athena

• Expose in the web API: "a study, mark inputs/outputs and get schemas in api" (part of meta-modeling #626)
• Expose studies resources and its i/o ports in public API

Review demo

• Create a project and add ports
• Retrieve project i/o port schemas via API

@mguidon would this fullfil this issue?

[mguidon]

I think this fulfills the requirements as stated in the Year 6 Milestones list.

[pcrespov]

Update on sprint Athena

Done

• Expose in the web API: "a study, mark inputs/outputs and get schemas in api"
• Expose studies resources and its i/o ports in public API

Open

This issues is mostly completed. Some open question/points remain though. Should we address now>

• Ports with files
• Expose to python client?

[elisabettai]

Hi @pcrespov, regarding your question if we should consider this milestone completed: this is the feedback from EN: "from the point of view of the sparc milestones, we consider it complete. however, for our own needs, we will need to finalize that implementation."

I'd proposed to create a new issue, if you want, with the remaining points and close this one.

fyi, the work done was reported to the NIH in the Q1 Report (I can provide you the link if you're interested).

[elisabettai]

Closing this one if favor of #792