Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Marked preview as Computed: true #4472

Merged

Conversation

melinath
Copy link
Member

@melinath melinath commented Feb 5, 2021

Partially resolved hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#8251.

I think the issue is that "preview" is optional; if it wasn't provided, it would be tracked as nil by the provider and "false" by the state. When the user goes to make a plan, terraform detects that "preview" will be updated from false -> null, which changes the hash of the object (which looks like a delete/recreate.) Changing to Computed fixes this by setting the provider's value from the API as well as the state.

There is a separate issue where changes are still erroneously detected if a match uses expr instead of config - I'm having some trouble figuring out the best solution in that case but wanted to get the first part out there at least :-)

If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:

  • Searched through the issue tracker for an open issue that this either resolves or contributes to, commented on it to claim it, and written "fixes {url}" or "part of {url}" in this PR description. If there were no relevant open issues, I opened one and commented that I would like to work on it (not necessary for very small changes).
  • Generated Terraform, and ran make test and make lint to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.
  • Ensured that all new fields I added that can be set by a user appear in at least one example (for generated resources) or third_party test (for handwritten resources or update tests).
  • Ran relevant acceptance tests (If the acceptance tests do not yet pass or you are unable to run them, please let your reviewer know).
  • Read the Release Notes Guide before writing my release note below.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

compute: fixed overly-aggressive detection of changes to google_compute_security_policy rules

@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes label Feb 5, 2021
@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

I have triggered VCR tests based on this PR's diffs. See the results here: "https://ci-oss.hashicorp.engineering/viewQueued.html?itemId=171151"

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Oops! It looks like you're using an unknown release-note type in your changelog entries:

  • REPLACEME

Please only use the types listed in https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules/blob/master/.ci/RELEASE_NOTES_GUIDE.md.

@melinath
Copy link
Member Author

melinath commented Feb 6, 2021

/gcbrun

@melinath melinath requested review from a team and nat-henderson and removed request for a team February 6, 2021 00:05
@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi! I'm the modular magician. Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Diff report:

Terraform GA: Diff ( 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

I have triggered VCR tests based on this PR's diffs. See the results here: "https://ci-oss.hashicorp.engineering/viewQueued.html?itemId=171235"

@melinath melinath requested review from a team and ScottSuarez and removed request for nat-henderson and a team February 8, 2021 16:55
Copy link
Contributor

@ScottSuarez ScottSuarez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

your analysis makes sense to me! :)

@ScottSuarez
Copy link
Contributor

gonna add @slevenick for a quick second pass. I don't know if it would be better to have a diff suppress? I think this is fine

@ScottSuarez ScottSuarez requested a review from slevenick February 8, 2021 19:24
Copy link
Contributor

@slevenick slevenick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Quick sanity check, can a user go from setting preview = true to preview = false and have the value actually update? Optional+Computed has some issues in these cases, but I might be thinking of objects rather than primitive values like booleans

@melinath
Copy link
Member Author

melinath commented Feb 8, 2021

I don't seem to have any problems doing that in local testing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

google_compute_security_policy all rules getting recreated
4 participants