Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: LHN dataflow rework #30242

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023
Merged

Conversation

adhorodyski
Copy link
Contributor

@adhorodyski adhorodyski commented Oct 24, 2023

This PR refactors a dataflow for the LHNOptionsList component to be top-down - all data is being fetched on the top level (list), processed and passed down to the renderItem via props - instead of passing a string of reportID and reading for all the collections' keys from Onyx per item.

This effort is an enabler for the Flashlist migration happening as part of this issue: #28902

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #28902 partially

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

To be added.

Android: Native
ANDROID.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
ANDROID_WEB.mov
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-web.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mp4

@adhorodyski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mountiny just updated the description, feel free to invite any1 interested for the review - I see the pipeline parts failing so definitely will need to update it shortly (eg. tests), but I was able to play around with this branch locally just fine.

Also, please see the Reassure logs yourself - we have -23 on different render count metric, but I will have to fix these tests as the ~45% increase in duration seems like a bug.

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @adhorodyski in general this makes sense to me and seems like clean approach too

Curious for review from others before we move onto completing this PR

src/components/LHNOptionsList/LHNOptionsList.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/LHNOptionsList/LHNOptionsList.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@adhorodyski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tgolen I'll definitely make sure to address all of your comments, thanks for taking the time! At the same time I think at this stage it's equally important to run this branch locally as we want to gather feedback on the list's responsiveness and the perceived performance (apart from raw numbers which have improved slightly).
Please let me know if you encounter any issues with this one!

Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approach makes sense to me. Thanks for working on this!

src/components/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowLHNData.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/LHNOptionsList/LHNOptionsList.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/LHNOptionsList/LHNOptionsList.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@TMisiukiewicz TMisiukiewicz force-pushed the lhn-dataflow-rework branch 2 times, most recently from de4209d to efda8d0 Compare November 3, 2023 09:41
@TMisiukiewicz
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham thanks, all comments are addressed now 👍 also removed the OptionRowLHNDataWithFocus, @kacper-mikolajczak I would appreciate additional pair of eyes to make sure everything is fine here :)

roryabraham
roryabraham previously approved these changes Nov 4, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for all the work here.

@adhorodyski adhorodyski marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2023 08:31
@adhorodyski adhorodyski requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2023 08:31
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from narefyev91 and removed request for a team November 6, 2023 08:31
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 6, 2023

@narefyev91 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@TMisiukiewicz
Copy link
Contributor

unit tests should be green now. @adhorodyski we're still missing iOS native and macOS Chrome videos, could you add them?

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor

narefyev91 commented Nov 6, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
android-web.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
ios-web.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android
android.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@narefyev91 narefyev91 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from roryabraham November 6, 2023 15:18
Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen tgolen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR looks very good!

@tgolen tgolen merged commit d75acaf into Expensify:main Nov 6, 2023
15 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 6, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@adhorodyski adhorodyski deleted the lhn-dataflow-rework branch November 6, 2023 20:32
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 6, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.3.96-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.3.96-15 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.3.97-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

({item: reportID}) => {
const itemFullReport = reports[`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}${reportID}`] || {};
const itemReportActions = reportActions[`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS}${reportID}`];
const itemParentReportActions = reportActions[`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_ACTIONS}${itemFullReport.parentReportID}`];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As we know already, there was crash after this refactor. itemParentReportActions was expected to be object but there's case of null.

'',
)}`;
const itemComment = draftComments[`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT_DRAFT_COMMENT}${reportID}`] || '';
const participantPersonalDetailList = _.values(OptionsListUtils.getPersonalDetailsForAccountIDs(itemFullReport.participantAccountIDs, personalDetails));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This misses an edge case where a user sent a last message in a room and then they leave the room. Then the report participant accountIDs do not include this user accountID and the user's email instead of their username is displayed in LHN. Issue #35477

viewMode={optionMode}
isFocused={!shouldDisableFocusOptions && reportID === currentReportID}
onSelectRow={onSelectRow}
preferredLocale={preferredLocale}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After adding preferredLocale to renderItem we should have added it to the FlatList's extraData too otherwise the list won't re-render

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably a false positive, the above is true for FlashList only. For FlatList the change in renderItem itself seems enough

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.