-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 417
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(debugging): emit probe status updates unconditionally #6714
fix(debugging): emit probe status updates unconditionally #6714
Conversation
We ensure that probe status update are sent when due, regardless of whether the RCM worker has found new data. This fixes a regression introduced by the IPC refactor for the RCM client.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice fix
The backport to
To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal: # Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-1.16 1.16
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-1.16
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport-6714-to-1.16
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 1726105fe1825e52855aeabcae61233d22fa4692
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport-6714-to-1.16
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-1.16 Then, create a pull request where the |
The backport to
To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal: # Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-1.17 1.17
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-1.17
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport-6714-to-1.17
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 1726105fe1825e52855aeabcae61233d22fa4692
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport-6714-to-1.17
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-1.17 Then, create a pull request where the |
The backport to
To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal: # Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-1.18 1.18
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-1.18
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport-6714-to-1.18
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 1726105fe1825e52855aeabcae61233d22fa4692
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport-6714-to-1.18
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-1.18 Then, create a pull request where the |
We ensure that probe status update are sent when due, regardless of whether the RCM worker has found new data. This fixes a regression introduced by the IPC refactor for the RCM client. - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) - [ ] Title is accurate. - [ ] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [ ] Description motivates each change. - [ ] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [ ] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) (cherry picked from commit 1726105)
We ensure that probe status update are sent when due, regardless of whether the RCM worker has found new data. This fixes a regression introduced by the IPC refactor for the RCM client. - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) - [ ] Title is accurate. - [ ] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [ ] Description motivates each change. - [ ] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [ ] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) (cherry picked from commit 1726105)
We ensure that probe status update are sent when due, regardless of whether the RCM worker has found new data. This fixes a regression introduced by the IPC refactor for the RCM client. - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) - [ ] Title is accurate. - [ ] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [ ] Description motivates each change. - [ ] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [ ] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) (cherry picked from commit 1726105)
…6714 to 1.18] (#6740) Backport of #6714 to 1.18 We ensure that probe status update are sent when due, regardless of whether the RCM worker has found new data. This fixes a regression introduced by the IPC refactor for the RCM client. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Title is accurate. - [x] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [x] Description motivates each change. - [x] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [x] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [x] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [x] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) --------- Co-authored-by: Munir Abdinur <[email protected]>
…6714 to 1.16] (#6742) Backport of #6714 to 1.16 We ensure that probe status update are sent when due, regardless of whether the RCM worker has found new data. This fixes a regression introduced by the IPC refactor for the RCM client. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Title is accurate. - [x] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [x] Description motivates each change. - [x] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [x] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [x] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [x] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)
…6714 to 1.16] (#6742) Backport of #6714 to 1.16 We ensure that probe status update are sent when due, regardless of whether the RCM worker has found new data. This fixes a regression introduced by the IPC refactor for the RCM client. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Title is accurate. - [x] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [x] Description motivates each change. - [x] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [x] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [x] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [x] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting) (cherry picked from commit 759f3f7)
…6714 to 1.17] (#6741) Backport of #6714 to 1.17 We ensure that probe status update are sent when due, regardless of whether the RCM worker has found new data. This fixes a regression introduced by the IPC refactor for the RCM client. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description. - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR. - [x] Risk is outlined (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability, etc). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed. If no release note is required, add label `changelog/no-changelog`. - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)). - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) ## Reviewer Checklist - [x] Title is accurate. - [x] No unnecessary changes are introduced. - [x] Description motivates each change. - [x] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes unless absolutely necessary. - [x] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risk(s). - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation). - [x] Release note makes sense to a user of the library. - [x] Reviewer has explicitly acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment. - [x] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)
We ensure that probe status update are sent when due, regardless of whether the RCM worker has found new data. This fixes a regression introduced by the IPC refactor for the RCM client.
Checklist
changelog/no-changelog
.Reviewer Checklist