[WIP] Add control offset to QuadraticCostWithOffset #82
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… on LQ examples matches Stackelberg LQ Solver in 1 iteration.
…ab/StackelbergControlHypothesesFiltering into hmzh/adjust-quadratic-cost
hmzh-khn
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Confirm that SILQGames on LQ example matches Stackelberg LQ Solver in 1 iteration for noisy Stackelberg control input of same horizon. However, a bad initial guess can fail to converge like this one.
LQ Stackelberg Example:
SILQGames with step size of 1, noisy LQ Stackelberg initial controls, max_iters=1
Next steps:
Fix the quadraticization function in CostUtils.jl with this type of fix.