-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add check to bb migrate script #1319
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks ok, but I understand that this would force a PR in the remote repo to be rebased on top of master before being able to migrate it (or at least to migrate it with the same end result). Also, this prevents migrating any PRs that had a base different than master, but I'm not sure if that's frequent in noir or bb. If we're fine with these limitations (and I'm not sure if those scenarios were even supported before), let's merge.
We don't hope to support every two way mirroring of repos. In many ways, only master and master are linked on the two repos. There is no need for a connection of any other branch, and it complicates git subrepo history if they are. So far rather prevent real problems (like I got pinged about) and to relax this later |
* Audit preperation (#1305) * compiler warnings * add solhint + fix small linter issues * remove skipped tests * update rollup address * add underscores on arguments in IVerifier * JB/Move global error to toast group (#1251) * Move global error message inside toast group * Mini refactor * Mini refactor * Add deferrals * Blockchain test jest -> mocha update (#1314) * run jest-to-mocha script * Manually fix the last test + add coverage + formatting * extend mocha timeout + bump optimizer runs * decrease optimizer runs to deploy old rollup processor in testing * remove coverage package, install on demand * make solidity-coverage import a comment in hardhat config * JB/Fix settlement times (#1315) Fix batched time, fix button regression * JB/Allow for debug to be exportable (#1313) * Allow for debug to be exportable * Remove exportable debug * Rollback * Refactor * Tweak export logs * Upgrade to latest bridge clients (#1319) - Align with interface on latest bridge-clients - Correct stETH address - Calc element ROI via getTermAPR - Calc stETH via getUnderlyingAsset * Explain when to squash vs merge (#1302) * Zw/update aztec connect specs (#1048) * updated account circuit * updated account circuit formatting * updated schnorr spec * updated intro * fix typo * updates in line with PR comments and rebase Co-authored-by: Josh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: iAmMichaelConnor <[email protected]> * Implemented rate limiting of deposits and address blacklist (#1323) * Implemented rate limiting of deposits and address blacklist * Cleanup * Additionally check num deposits in tx receiver (#1326) * Additionally check num deposits in tx receiver * Sanity check input * Additional tests (#1327) * JB/Connect yearn bridge (#1334) * Add yearn recipe * Connect yearn bridge * Fix toast z-index * Fix price estimation for yearn bridge * Take out console log * Set up yvDAI bridge config * Add styling for yearn (wip) * Add price fetcher for yvDAI and yvETH * Fix icon * Fix exit modal * Fixes and improvements * Add collapse button to Toast component (#1322) * don't expose blacklist (#1352) * don't expose blacklist * don't use delete keyword * fix status endpoint types * format * fix server * fix server * Expose blacklist as undefined from public api. Co-authored-by: Leila Wang <[email protected]> * Jcf/hotfix yearn exit (#1356) * - allow exiting via a different bridgeAddressId - fix incorrect batch info shown for exiting - more explicit name: useDefaultEnterBridgeCallData - fix wstETH price fetch regression * upgrade bridge clients * explicitly upgrade ethers * Jcf/element hotfixes (#1377) - safe number to bigint conversion - fix default element term apr when entering - infer async from recipe, not interaction result Co-authored-by: joss-aztec <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Lasse Herskind <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jonathan Bursztyn <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Zachary James Williamson <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Josh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: iAmMichaelConnor <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Joe Andrews <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Leila Wang <[email protected]>
Just an extra check on assumptions.
This may become obsolete for barretenberg once we all move, but also may become relevant again if we go a Noir subrepo route.