Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(slackbot): clean up slack alerts #1272

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024
Merged

ci(slackbot): clean up slack alerts #1272

merged 11 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

arealmaas
Copy link
Collaborator

@arealmaas arealmaas commented Oct 11, 2024

Description

  • Seems to be a classic case of "smør på flesk" to have both the pipeline failing slack message and the k6-tests slack message. Won't give any additional value until we can upload the test result file in the message and make it sweeter: Feature Request: be able to post a file to slack slackapi/slack-github-action#92 Removing for now.
  • Tweaked the template a bit for the pipeline slack message
  • This is a good start, and we can expand by adding more info on the slack-message, for now posting a status for each workflow.
image

Related Issue(s)

Verification

  • Your code builds clean without any errors or warnings
  • Manual testing done (required)
  • Relevant automated test added (if you find this hard, leave it and we'll help out)

Documentation

  • Documentation is updated (either in docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced Slack notifications for pipeline statuses with improved structure and clarity.
    • Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for sending CI/CD status updates to Slack, capturing results from multiple jobs.
    • Updated existing Slack message jobs to report on both success and failure conditions across various environments.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed unnecessary Slack message sending on K6 test failures, streamlining the workflow.
  • Documentation

    • Updated environment variables and job conditions for better clarity and functionality in CI/CD processes.

@arealmaas arealmaas requested review from a team as code owners October 11, 2024 10:18
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 11, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several modifications to the CI/CD workflows and Slack notification structures. The JSON format for Slack notifications regarding pipeline failures is updated from a "blocks" array to an "attachments" array, enhancing clarity. A new GitHub Actions workflow for sending Slack messages upon CI/CD status changes is added, which includes various input parameters and utilizes a new action for sending notifications. The existing CI/CD workflows are modified to incorporate this new action and provide comprehensive status updates to Slack.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json Updated Slack notification structure from "blocks" to "attachments"; added header with title and emoji; modified environment info presentation; updated "View Run" URL.
.github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml New workflow introduced to send Slack messages based on CI/CD status; includes multiple required input parameters and secrets.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-main.yml Modified send-slack-message job to run on both success and failure; updated job dependencies and input parameters; uses new action for sending Slack messages.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml Introduced send-slack-message job for deployment status notifications; updated to use new action for sending messages.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml Added send-slack-message job for status notifications; updated job conditions and dependencies; utilizes new action for sending Slack messages.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-pull-request-title.yml New job added to send Slack messages regarding CI/CD status using the new action.

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • oskogstad
  • elsand

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@arealmaas arealmaas changed the title Ci/clean up slack alerts ci(slackbot): clean up slack alerts Oct 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
.github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json (2)

31-43: Improved "View Run" button implementation

The "View Run" button is now correctly implemented within an "actions" block, which is the proper way to include interactive elements in Slack messages. The use of the ${{ env.RUN_URL }} variable for the button URL is a good practice, allowing for more flexibility and easier maintenance.

Consider adding a small improvement:

 "text": {
   "type": "plain_text",
-  "text": "View Run"
+  "text": "View Run",
+  "emoji": true
 },

Adding "emoji": true to the button text allows for emoji usage if desired in the future, maintaining consistency with the header style.


1-46: Overall improvement in Slack notification structure and content

The changes made to this Slack notification template significantly improve its structure, readability, and effectiveness. The new layout with a clear header, well-organized content sections, and a properly implemented action button will make it easier for team members to quickly understand and respond to pipeline failures.

These improvements align well with the PR objectives of enhancing the clarity and usefulness of Slack alerts related to the CI pipeline. The structure now allows for easy expansion in the future, such as adding more detailed information or separating different types of failures.

For future enhancements, consider:

  1. Adding more detailed error information if available.
  2. Including links to relevant documentation or troubleshooting guides.
  3. Implementing different color codes for various types of failures (e.g., infrastructure vs. application).
.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (3)

Line range hint 123-123: Consider a more descriptive job name

The current job name "Send Slack message on failure" is clear, but it could be more specific to indicate it's for the staging environment. Consider renaming it to "Send staging failure notification to Slack" for improved clarity.


132-132: Consider Slack GitHub Action version strategy

The Slack GitHub Action is pinned to version v1.27.0, which is good for stability. However, consider if you want to automatically receive minor updates. If so, you could use v1.27 to get patch updates, or v1 to get minor updates. Alternatively, you could set up a dependency update bot like Dependabot to keep this updated.


Line range hint 123-135: Consider differentiating between types of failures

The new Slack notification job effectively catches all failures in the workflow. However, as mentioned in the PR objectives, having both pipeline failure and k6-test failure messages might be redundant. Consider enhancing the Slack message to differentiate between types of failures (e.g., infrastructure, application, or test failures). This could provide more specific and actionable information in the Slack notifications.

You could pass an additional environment variable to the Slack message indicating the type of failure, based on which job(s) failed. For example:

- name: Determine failure type
  id: failure-type
  run: |
    if [[ "${{ needs.deploy-infra-staging.result }}" == "failure" ]]; then
      echo "FAILURE_TYPE=Infrastructure Deployment" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
    elif [[ "${{ needs.deploy-apps-staging.result }}" == "failure" ]]; then
      echo "FAILURE_TYPE=Application Deployment" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
    elif [[ "${{ needs.run-e2e-tests.result }}" == "failure" ]]; then
      echo "FAILURE_TYPE=E2E Tests" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
    else
      echo "FAILURE_TYPE=Unknown" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
    fi

- name: Send GitHub slack message
  env:
    FAILURE_TYPE: ${{ steps.failure-type.outputs.FAILURE_TYPE }}
  # ... rest of the step

Then update your Slack message template to include this failure type information.

.github/workflows/ci-cd-main.yml (1)

166-166: Consider further enhancements to Slack notifications

The addition of the RUN_URL is a great improvement. In line with the PR objectives, consider these future enhancements:

  1. Evaluate the need for both pipeline failure and k6-test failure messages.
  2. Explore options to include more detailed information in Slack messages.
  3. Consider separating alerts for different types of failures (e.g., infrastructure vs. application).

These improvements could further streamline the notification process and provide more actionable information.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3034372 and 5b14db8.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/action-run-k6-tests.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd-main.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/action-run-k6-tests.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json (3)

1-46: Improved Slack message structure

The change from using a top-level "blocks" array to an "attachments" array with nested "blocks" is a good improvement. This structure allows for better organization and visual separation of the message content in Slack.


6-13: Effective header addition

The new header block with the text "Github pipeline failing" and an emoji is a good addition. It immediately draws attention to the nature of the message, improving its visibility and impact in Slack.


14-30: Improved content organization

The reorganization of content into separate sections for environment information and additional details, along with the added divider, significantly improves the readability and structure of the message. This layout makes it easier for users to quickly grasp important information.

.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (1)

130-130: Good addition of the RUN_URL variable

The addition of the RUN_URL environment variable is a good improvement. It provides valuable context in the Slack message by linking directly to the specific workflow run, which will help in quickly accessing relevant information when investigating failures.

.github/workflows/ci-cd-main.yml (1)

166-166: Excellent addition of the RUN_URL variable!

This change enhances the Slack notification by providing a direct link to the specific GitHub Actions run. It aligns well with the PR objective of improving Slack alerts related to the CI pipeline. This addition will make it easier for the team to quickly access and investigate failed runs.

.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (2)

Line range hint 146-157: LGTM: Proper integration of the Slack notification job.

The send-slack-message job is well-integrated into the existing workflow:

  1. It's positioned correctly at the end of the workflow.
  2. It depends on all deployment jobs, ensuring comprehensive failure detection.
  3. It uses existing secrets and variables, maintaining consistency.

This integration ensures that the Slack notification will be sent if any part of the deployment process fails, providing timely alerts to the team.


Line range hint 146-157: LGTM: Addition of Slack notification for deployment failures.

The new send-slack-message job is a valuable addition to the workflow. It provides immediate notification of deployment failures, which can help in quick response and resolution of issues.

Consider splitting this job into separate notifications for each deployment job (deploy-infra-prod, deploy-apps-prod, deploy-slack-notifier-prod). This would allow for more specific failure notifications, making it easier to identify which part of the deployment process failed.

Example:

send-slack-message-infra:
  needs: [deploy-infra-prod]
  if: ${{ always() && failure() && !cancelled() }}
  # ... (rest of the job configuration)

send-slack-message-apps:
  needs: [deploy-apps-prod]
  if: ${{ always() && failure() && !cancelled() }}
  # ... (rest of the job configuration)

send-slack-message-slack-notifier:
  needs: [deploy-slack-notifier-prod]
  if: ${{ always() && failure() && !cancelled() }}
  # ... (rest of the job configuration)

Could you please provide the content of the Slack message template file ./.github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json for review? This will help ensure that the notification content is appropriate and includes all necessary information.

✅ Verification successful

Final Review

The Slack message template is well-structured and effectively conveys the necessary information for pipeline failures. It dynamically includes the environment and a direct link to the failed run, enhancing the debugging process.

Consider splitting the send-slack-message job into separate notifications for each deployment job (deploy-infra-prod, deploy-apps-prod, deploy-slack-notifier-prod). This approach allows for more specific failure notifications, making it easier to identify which part of the deployment process encountered issues.

send-slack-message-infra:
  needs: [deploy-infra-prod]
  if: ${{ always() && failure() && !cancelled() }}
  # ... (rest of the job configuration)

send-slack-message-apps:
  needs: [deploy-apps-prod]
  if: ${{ always() && failure() && !cancelled() }}
  # ... (rest of the job configuration)

send-slack-message-slack-notifier:
  needs: [deploy-slack-notifier-prod]
  if: ${{ always() && failure() && !cancelled() }}
  # ... (rest of the job configuration)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
cat ./.github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json

Length of output: 1031

.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
.github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json (3)

6-13: LGTM: Clear header with visual enhancement.

The addition of a header block with the title "Github pipeline status" provides a clear and concise introduction to the notification. The inclusion of an emoji adds visual appeal and helps quickly identify the message type.

Consider capitalizing "GitHub" in the header text for consistency with the official brand name:

-            "text": "Github pipeline status",
+            "text": "GitHub pipeline status",

14-27: LGTM: Informative environment and job status sections.

The addition of separate sections for environment information and detailed job status significantly enhances the notification's informativeness. The use of environment variables (${{ env.ENVIRONMENT }}, ${{ env.INFRA_STATUS }}, etc.) allows for dynamic content, making the notification adaptable to different scenarios.

Consider adding icons or color-coding to the job status list for improved visual parsing. For example:

-            "text": "*Job Status:*\n• Infrastructure: ${{ env.INFRA_STATUS }}\n• Apps: ${{ env.APPS_STATUS }}\n• Slack Notifier: ${{ env.SLACK_NOTIFIER_STATUS }}\n• E2E Tests: ${{ env.E2E_TESTS_STATUS }}\n• Schema NPM: ${{ env.SCHEMA_NPM_STATUS }}\n• Publish: ${{ env.PUBLISH_STATUS }}"
+            "text": "*Job Status:*\n• Infrastructure: ${{ env.INFRA_STATUS == 'success' && ':white_check_mark:' || ':x:' }} ${{ env.INFRA_STATUS }}\n• Apps: ${{ env.APPS_STATUS == 'success' && ':white_check_mark:' || ':x:' }} ${{ env.APPS_STATUS }}\n• Slack Notifier: ${{ env.SLACK_NOTIFIER_STATUS == 'success' && ':white_check_mark:' || ':x:' }} ${{ env.SLACK_NOTIFIER_STATUS }}\n• E2E Tests: ${{ env.E2E_TESTS_STATUS == 'success' && ':white_check_mark:' || ':x:' }} ${{ env.E2E_TESTS_STATUS }}\n• Schema NPM: ${{ env.SCHEMA_NPM_STATUS == 'success' && ':white_check_mark:' || ':x:' }} ${{ env.SCHEMA_NPM_STATUS }}\n• Publish: ${{ env.PUBLISH_STATUS == 'success' && ':white_check_mark:' || ':x:' }} ${{ env.PUBLISH_STATUS }}"

This change would add checkmark or cross icons based on the status, improving readability at a glance.


1-54: Summary: Improved Slack notification structure aligns with PR objectives.

The changes to this file successfully address the PR objectives of cleaning up Slack alerts and improving the clarity of pipeline failure messages. The new structure provides a more comprehensive and visually organized notification, including environment information and detailed job statuses. These improvements will help users quickly understand the nature and extent of pipeline failures.

As the PR author suggested, consider future enhancements such as:

  1. Providing more detailed information in the Slack messages.
  2. Separating alerts for different types of failures (e.g., infrastructure versus application failures).
  3. Implementing the capability to upload test result files in the messages once the referenced issue in the Slack GitHub Action repository is resolved.
.github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml (1)

99-99: Add a new line at the end of the file.

To adhere to YAML best practices and prevent potential issues with some tools, it's recommended to add a new line character at the end of the file.

Add a blank line at the end of the file:

   payload-file-path: "./.github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json"
+

This change will resolve the yamllint warning and improve the file's compatibility with various tools and systems.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 99-99: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (3)

121-132: Improved Slack notification implementation

The changes to the send-slack-message job significantly enhance the Slack notification system, aligning well with the PR objectives. The job now provides more comprehensive status updates and uses a modular approach with a separate action.

Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the ${{ always() }} condition in the if statement. This will help future maintainers understand why the job should run regardless of the success or failure of other jobs.

-    if: ${{ always() && (failure() || success()) }}
+    if: ${{ always() && (failure() || success()) }} # Ensure this job runs regardless of other job statuses

133-135: New Slack channel for releases

The addition of the SLACK_CHANNEL_ID_FOR_RELEASES secret is a good improvement for organizing Slack notifications.

Consider updating the project documentation to reflect this new Slack channel for releases. This will help team members understand where to expect different types of notifications.


Line range hint 1-135: Summary of CI/CD workflow improvements

The changes to this workflow file significantly enhance the CI/CD pipeline and Slack notification system:

  1. The addition of an ENVIRONMENT variable (if usable) improves maintainability.
  2. The send-slack-message job now provides more comprehensive status updates.
  3. The use of a separate action for Slack notifications improves modularity.
  4. The addition of a separate Slack channel for releases helps in organizing notifications.

These improvements align well with the PR objectives to clean up and enhance Slack alerts. The changes lay a good foundation for potential future enhancements, such as providing more detailed information in Slack messages or separating alerts for different types of failures.

As the CI/CD pipeline evolves, consider implementing the following improvements:

  1. Implement the capability to upload test result files in Slack messages, as mentioned in the PR objectives.
  2. Explore ways to provide more granular information about different types of failures (e.g., infrastructure vs. application) in the Slack notifications.
  3. If not already in place, consider implementing a notification throttling mechanism to prevent notification fatigue during periods of frequent deployments or issues.
.github/workflows/ci-cd-main.yml (1)

154-168: Excellent improvements to the Slack notification system!

The changes to the send-slack-message job significantly enhance the clarity and usefulness of the Slack alerts, which aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. Here's a summary of the improvements:

  1. The job now runs on both success and failure, providing a more complete picture of the CI/CD process.
  2. It includes statuses of all relevant jobs, offering more detailed information.
  3. The use of a dedicated action for sending Slack messages improves maintainability.

These changes will greatly improve the team's ability to monitor the CI/CD pipeline effectively.

Consider adding a comment above the send-slack-message job to briefly explain its purpose and the information it provides. This would enhance the readability and maintainability of the workflow file.

.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (1)

K6 Tests in Production Workflow Remain Inactive

The production workflow (.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml) still has the run-e2e-tests job commented out. This means that k6 tests are not currently being executed in the production environment, which contradicts the PR objectives of enhancing Slack alerts related to these tests.

  • File: .github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml
  • Lines: 116-138 (run-e2e-tests job remains commented out)

Please ensure that the k6 tests are properly integrated and active in the production workflow to align with the PR objectives.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 116-138: Clarify the status of k6 tests mentioned in PR objectives

The PR objectives mention improvements to Slack alerts related to k6 tests. However, the changes in this file don't seem to address this directly. The run-e2e-tests job (lines 116-138) is commented out and doesn't appear to have been modified in this PR.

Could you please clarify:

  1. Are the k6 tests mentioned in the PR objectives related to this commented-out run-e2e-tests job?
  2. If so, what is the plan for integrating these tests into the workflow and the new Slack notification system?
  3. If not, where are the k6 tests implemented, and how will they be integrated with the new Slack notification system?

To help verify the current state of k6 test integration, you can run the following script:

This will help identify any k6 related files and mentions in the workflows, which can guide further discussion on integrating k6 tests with the new Slack notification system.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for k6 related configurations in the repository

echo "Searching for k6 related files:"
fd -e js -e json k6

echo "\nSearching for k6 mentions in workflow files:"
rg --type yaml 'k6' .github/workflows/

Length of output: 1630

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b14db8 and f8a6146.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd-main.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml

13-13: input "infra_status" of workflow_call event has the default value "skipped", but it is also required. if an input is marked as required, its default value will never be used

(events)


18-18: input "apps_status" of workflow_call event has the default value "skipped", but it is also required. if an input is marked as required, its default value will never be used

(events)


23-23: input "slack_notifier_status" of workflow_call event has the default value "skipped", but it is also required. if an input is marked as required, its default value will never be used

(events)


28-28: input "e2e_tests_status" of workflow_call event has the default value "skipped", but it is also required. if an input is marked as required, its default value will never be used

(events)


33-33: input "schema_npm_status" of workflow_call event has the default value "skipped", but it is also required. if an input is marked as required, its default value will never be used

(events)


38-38: input "publish_status" of workflow_call event has the default value "skipped", but it is also required. if an input is marked as required, its default value will never be used

(events)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:21:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects

(shellcheck)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:21:71: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:22:69: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:23:89: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:24:79: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:25:81: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:26:75: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml

[error] 99-99: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/slack-templates/pipeline-failed.json (3)

1-5: LGTM: Appropriate structure and color for failure notification.

The change from "blocks" to "attachments" is consistent with Slack's message formatting options. The red color (#FF0000) is suitable for a failure notification, making it visually distinct and attention-grabbing.


28-37: LGTM: Helpful additional information and improved visual structure.

The inclusion of a section prompting users to check the workflow for more details provides useful guidance. The addition of a divider improves the visual structure of the notification by clearly separating the main content from the action button.


38-53: LGTM: Improved "View Run" button implementation.

The retention of the "View Run" button maintains easy access to detailed information. The change to use an environment variable (${{ env.RUN_URL }}) for the button URL improves flexibility and maintainability.

To ensure the RUN_URL environment variable is correctly set, please run the following verification script:

This script will help confirm that the RUN_URL environment variable is properly defined in the relevant workflow files.

✅ Verification successful

Verified: RUN_URL environment variable is correctly set.

  • The RUN_URL environment variable is properly defined in .github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the RUN_URL environment variable is set in the relevant workflow files.

# Test: Search for the RUN_URL variable in workflow files
rg --type yaml 'RUN_URL:' .github/workflows/

Length of output: 198

.github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml (1)

1-4: LGTM: Workflow name and trigger are well-defined.

The workflow name "Send CI/CD Status Slack Message" is descriptive and accurately represents its purpose. Using the workflow_call event is appropriate for creating a reusable workflow that can be called from other workflows.

.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-153: Summary of changes and alignment with PR objectives

The changes to this workflow file align partially with the stated PR objectives:

  1. ✅ The new send-slack-message job consolidates Slack notifications for multiple deployment steps, which supports the goal of cleaning up Slack alerts.

  2. ❓ The PR objectives mention improvements to Slack alerts related to k6 tests, but this is not directly addressed in the current changes. The relationship between the commented-out run-e2e-tests job and the mentioned k6 tests needs clarification.

  3. ✅ The new Slack notification system provides a foundation for potential future enhancements, such as more detailed information in Slack messages or separate alerts for different types of failures.

To ensure full alignment with the PR objectives:

  1. Please clarify the status and integration plans for k6 tests, as mentioned in a previous comment.
  2. Consider the suggestions for making the status reporting more flexible in the send-slack-message job, to accommodate future additions like k6 test results.

Once these points are addressed, the changes will fully meet the stated objectives of the PR.

.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/ci-cd-pull-request-title.yml (1)

23-35: New Slack notification job added

The addition of the send-slack-message job enhances the workflow by introducing Slack notifications for various CI/CD statuses. This aligns with the PR objectives of improving Slack alerts related to the CI pipeline.

A few observations and suggestions:

  1. The job uses a local action (action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml), which is good for maintainability and reusability.
  2. The environment is set to the repository name, which is a good practice for identifying the source of notifications.
  3. The statuses for different parts of the pipeline are hardcoded. Consider making these dynamic based on the actual job results.
  4. The job is using appropriate secrets for Slack integration.

Consider refactoring the hardcoded status values to use dynamic job outputs. This would make the Slack notifications more accurate and useful. For example:

send-slack-message:
  needs: [validate, build, test]  # Add other relevant jobs
  uses: ./.github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml
  with:
    environment: ${{ github.event.repository.name }}
    infra_status: ${{ needs.build.result }}
    apps_status: ${{ needs.test.result }}
    # ... other statuses ...
  secrets:
    SLACK_BOT_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SLACK_BOT_TOKEN }}
    SLACK_CHANNEL_ID: ${{ secrets.SLACK_CHANNEL_ID_FOR_CI_CD_STATUS }}

This change would ensure that the Slack notifications reflect the actual status of each part of the pipeline.

.github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml (1)

99-99: Add a newline character at the end of the file.

To adhere to YAML best practices and improve compatibility with various tools, add a newline character at the end of the file.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 99-99: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (1)

121-132: Improved Slack notification system

The changes to the send-slack-message job significantly enhance the Slack notification system, aligning well with the PR objectives. Great improvements include:

  1. Running on both success and failure, providing more comprehensive status updates.
  2. Depending on multiple jobs, allowing for a more detailed status report.
  3. Using a reusable workflow for sending CI/CD status, which improves maintainability.

These changes will provide more valuable information to the team about the CI/CD process.

Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this job and the information it sends to Slack, to improve readability for future maintainers.

.github/workflows/ci-cd-main.yml (1)

154-168: Improved Slack notification system

The changes to the send-slack-message job significantly enhance the Slack notification system. By including statuses of all relevant jobs and triggering on both success and failure, it provides a more comprehensive overview of the CI/CD pipeline status. This aligns well with the PR objectives of cleaning up and improving Slack alerts.

Consider adding a comment above the send-slack-message job to briefly explain its purpose and the information it provides. This would improve the workflow's readability and maintainability. For example:

  # Send a comprehensive Slack message with the status of all CI/CD jobs
  send-slack-message:
    name: Send Slack message
    ...
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f8a6146 and 05a66c0.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd-main.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd-pull-request-title.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml

13-13: input "infra_status" of workflow_call event has the default value "skipped", but it is also required. if an input is marked as required, its default value will never be used

(events)


18-18: input "apps_status" of workflow_call event has the default value "skipped", but it is also required. if an input is marked as required, its default value will never be used

(events)


23-23: input "slack_notifier_status" of workflow_call event has the default value "skipped", but it is also required. if an input is marked as required, its default value will never be used

(events)


28-28: input "e2e_tests_status" of workflow_call event has the default value "skipped", but it is also required. if an input is marked as required, its default value will never be used

(events)


33-33: input "schema_npm_status" of workflow_call event has the default value "skipped", but it is also required. if an input is marked as required, its default value will never be used

(events)


38-38: input "publish_status" of workflow_call event has the default value "skipped", but it is also required. if an input is marked as required, its default value will never be used

(events)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:21:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects

(shellcheck)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:21:71: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:22:69: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:23:89: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:24:79: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:25:81: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


55-55: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:26:75: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml

[error] 99-99: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml (1)

1-4: LGTM: Workflow name and trigger are well-defined.

The workflow name clearly describes its purpose, and using the workflow_call event makes it reusable, which is a good practice for modular CI/CD pipelines.

.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml (1)

133-135: Secure handling of Slack credentials

The use of secrets for the Slack bot token and channel ID is a good security practice. The specific naming of SLACK_CHANNEL_ID_FOR_CI_CD_STATUS clearly indicates its purpose, reducing the chance of misuse.

.github/workflows/ci-cd-main.yml (1)

154-168: Verify the new Slack notification system

The changes to the send-slack-message job enhance the workflow's feedback mechanism without affecting its core functionality. This is a positive improvement that aligns with the PR objectives.

To ensure the new Slack notification system works as intended, please:

  1. Trigger the workflow manually using the workflow_dispatch event.
  2. Verify that the Slack message is sent and includes the status of all jobs.
  3. Intentionally fail one of the jobs (e.g., by introducing a temporary error) and verify that the Slack message accurately reflects this failure.
✅ Verification successful

Slack Notification System Verified Successfully

The new Slack notification system is correctly implemented. The action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml file exists and contains the appropriate configuration for sending CI/CD status messages.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the presence of the new action file and verify its contents

# Test 1: Check if the new action file exists
if [ -f ".github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml" ]; then
    echo "New action file exists."
else
    echo "Error: New action file not found."
    exit 1
fi

# Test 2: Verify the contents of the new action file
grep -q "name: Send CI/CD status Slack message" .github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
    echo "New action file contains expected content."
else
    echo "Error: New action file does not contain expected content."
    exit 1
fi

echo "Verification completed successfully."

Length of output: 393


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Display the contents of the new action file for inspection

# Display the entire contents of the action file
echo "Contents of action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml:"
cat .github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml

# Search for any lines containing 'Send CI/CD'
grep -i "send ci/cd" .github/workflows/action-send-ci-cd-status-slack-message.yml

Length of output: 3808

.github/workflows/ci-cd-pull-request-title.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/ci-cd-staging.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/ci-cd-prod.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants